OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Republicans Face Headwinds in Midterm Elections

6 sources · updated 2026-10-17
Left 100% Center 0% Right 0%
6 left · 0 center · 0 right

What happened

With the November 3 midterm elections approaching, late-September and early-October polls put President Donald Trump’s approval rating in the low-to-mid 30s in named surveys (Pew at 30 percent; Reuters/Ipsos at 32 percent) and somewhat higher in aggregators, while Democrats led on the generic congressional ballot. From Labor Day through October 14, Republican-aligned groups spent more than $740 million on congressional races, including at least $220 million from Trump-linked groups; Elon Musk gave more than $276 million to Republican groups since July, according to CNBC’s analysis of AdImpact and FEC data. Despite that spending, FiftyPlusOne averages still showed Democrats leading in nine competitive Senate races, and GOP outside groups shifted money into previously safer Republican seats and cut or reduced support in several House and Senate contests. The Cook Political Report said Democrats were favored to flip the House and remained competitive in the Senate, and it reported that mid-decade redistricting had cut competitive House seats from 87 to 77.
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK. Only left-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days; Daily Wire reported it on 2026-10-13.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage reports that a Republican spending surge has not moved the Senate map, and that even a Democratic wave may not slow Trump. Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication. The split that changes how the story reads is internal: CNBC treats the cash edge as a failed equalizer, while Vox says this White House "sees Congress as something to be overcome." The money stories lead with late super PAC ad buys and Musk’s checks. Vox leads with court-backed agency firings and a presidency built to run without Congress. A reader of the silent side misses both the claim that the money is not working and the claim that winning in November may not constrain the executive. If Democrats take Congress, which of the unilateral moves Vox lists would a new majority have the power to reverse?
Bottom line

Left-leaning outlets disagree on the diagnosis: CNBC’s $740 million post-Labor Day blitz did not move Senate polls, while Vox says the real problem is a presidency already insulated from Congress.

The receipts — 1 fact one side's coverage lacks
  • In Trump v. Slaughter the Supreme Court sided with Trump 6-3, overturning Humphrey’s Executor legal rulingin Vox · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
The outlets covering this present a GOP midterm strategy under strain from Trump’s unpopularity, a difficult political climate, and spending that has not clearly moved polls. Vox argued that even a Democratic wave might not slow Trump’s agenda, citing expanded executive actions, the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision in Trump v. Slaughter, mid-decade gerrymandering, and a White House approach of governing without Congress; a separate Vox interview with the New York Times’s Shane Goldmacher described a historic Republican big-donor edge (Trump’s super PAC near $400 million; the RNC about $130 million) that was nonetheless being used more to defend seats than to expand the map. CNBC reported that more than $740 million in GOP congressional spending after Labor Day, plus Musk’s contributions, had produced little change in key Senate polling, with groups moving from offense to defense in Texas, Kansas, Nebraska, North Carolina, and several House districts. Bloomberg briefly framed the contest as Democrats having energy and Republicans having numbers if they turn out. Vox also carried on-the-ground reporting from Enlace Latino NC on Latino voters in North Carolina, cost of living, Spanish-language misinformation, and state election-administration changes.
Our Take (balanced)
The campaign-finance and polling core is substantive: named PACs, FEC cash-on-hand figures, AdImpact ad totals, Cook and FiftyPlusOne race ratings, and specific candidates and districts are checkable records, not one party’s uncorroborated word. What is established is the reported spending, cash advantage, poll numbers, and map shifts as of the cited dates; what remains analysis or alleged is that money “isn’t working,” that a Democratic Congress could not constrain Trump, and that Project 2025 or unitary-executive theory will determine post-election outcomes. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch next for updated Cook ratings, the next FEC reports, further super PAC reservation changes, official campaign responses, and the November 3 results.

6 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.