OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Trump Waives Russia Sanctions Drawing Zelensky Criticism

85 sources · updated 2026-10-19
Left 65% Center 15% Right 20%
55 left · 13 center · 17 right

What happened

On Friday, October 17, 2026, President Donald Trump signed an executive order pausing implementation of sweeping new U.S. sanctions on Russia that Congress had passed with bipartisan support and that Trump had signed into law the previous month. Named the Lindsey Graham Act after the late South Carolina senator, the law targeted Russian officials, banks, and a shadow fleet of tankers used to move Russian energy, and the waiver came two days before a statutory implementation deadline; Trump told Congress the pause was in the national interest. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called the decision "unfortunate," said it disregarded legislation meant to pressure Russia to end the war, and later warned that the United States formally siding with Russia would be a "historic mistake"; Trump said he did not want to drive Russia from peace talks and accused Zelenskyy of not wanting to end the war. The story was first reported by AFP on 2026-10-17, credited as the origin by Breitbart, with Zelenskyy as the first on-record source (The Hill, 2026-10-17). The waiver followed Trump's announcement of a deal to purchase Russian diesel and coincided with continued Russian strikes on Ukrainian energy sites and Ukrainian drone attacks inside Russia.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 85 articles

69 of 75 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report. Volodymyr Zelenskyy denied part of it on the record.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 69 of 75
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Catherine Lucey, Donald Trump, President Trump, Volodymyr Zelensky, Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Jonathan Karl
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 9 of 75
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: social media post, interview, market data, executive order
Credits another outlet 1 of 75
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: AFP
Unnamed sources 8 of 75
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
On-record denial 1
A named person or institution says the claim, or part of it, is not true. It is on the record — someone signed their name to it — but it is not confirmation, so it never counts toward On the record. Criticizing or dissenting from a decision is not a denial. The count is how many people or institutions deny it; each is listed with the first article that carried the denial. Here: Volodymyr Zelenskyy (NBC News, Oct 11, 15:02 UTC)
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 11, 13:06 UTC by Bloomberg, naming its source. First document 1 hour later, from Washington Examiner (social media post).
Not counted 10
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage presents Trump's order as a broad halt to new Russia sanctions and never reports the administration's claim that the lift was temporary and limited to diesel. He waived sweeping new sanctions against Russia, according to NBC News. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described a 60-day period, according to the Washington Examiner. Bessent said "the only thing that has been lifted is the diesel embargo." A reader of the left-leaning accounts therefore meets a full retreat from the Graham Act, not the narrow pause the White House was describing that weekend. The two sides did not describe Zelensky's tone the same way. Right-leaning coverage said Zelensky "Complains." He called the pause "unfortunate," according to ABC News. What does the executive order actually suspend, and when do the paused sanctions take effect?
Bottom line

Read NBC News and Trump waived a sweeping Russia sanctions law. Read the Washington Examiner and the Treasury secretary only lifted a diesel embargo for 60 days.

The receipts — 2 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the waiver was a 60-day period and that only the diesel embargo had been lifted official statementin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Putin envoy Kirill Dmitriev called suspension of the Graham Act an important and truly historic moment official statementin Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets presented the waiver as abandoning bipartisan pressure on Moscow and aligning Washington with the Kremlin. Zelenskyy said a decision had been made "to completely disregard the Lindsey Graham Act, which was supposed to impose truly effective pressure on Russia to bring this war to an end," argued that blocking it would encourage Russia to continue killing, and described the waived sanctions as "strengthening Putin's war against us" and "really big support for Putin." He warned that U.S. siding with Putin would be a "historic mistake," said Ukraine "will not prevail" if the two countries stand together, and still hoped Trump would "change his decisions" because "it's all mistakes." Sen. Richard Blumenthal said the waivers "have nothing to do with our national security, and everything to do with sucking up to Vladimir Putin." Coverage linked the pause to the Russian diesel purchase, a brief block on intelligence sharing, and Starshield speed limits, arguing the combination left Ukraine exposed as winter approaches and that limiting Ukraine's ability to retaliate would not bring peace.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets framed Zelenskyy as complaining that the pause would encourage Putin and "reward" the Kremlin, and highlighted Russian officials celebrating the move: Putin envoy Kirill Dmitriev called the suspension "an important and truly historic moment." Trump said "My decision on Russia is a simple one," stated he was "in the process of negotiating Peace" and did not want to "drive, foolishly, Russia away from the bargaining table," and accused Zelenskyy of targeting Russian diesel refineries and of not wanting to end the war. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the action as a "60-day period so we can examine what's going on" and said "the only thing that has been lifted is the diesel embargo."
Our Take (balanced)
The left's strongest argument is that pausing sanctions Trump had just signed removes economic pressure while Russia intensifies attacks on Ukraine's energy grid, a claim supported by Zelenskyy's description of the waiver as strengthening Putin's war and by Blumenthal's assertion that it had "nothing to do with our national security." The right's strongest argument is that the pause is a limited, reversible step to keep Russia negotiating and to ease U.S. fuel costs, supported by Trump's stated fear of driving Russia from talks and Bessent's account of a 60-day review confined to the diesel embargo. The central unresolved tension is whether holding the sanctions is a bargaining tactic that could produce negotiations, or a concession that reduces U.S. leverage on Moscow without evidence that Putin is moving toward ending the war.

85 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.