Widow Sues Over Fatal Amazon Cargo Plane Crash in Miami
Left 67%
Center 0%
Right 33%
2 left · 0 center · 1 right
What happened
A Boeing 767-300 cargo jet branded for Amazon and operated by 21 Air overran a runway while landing at Miami International Airport on a return flight from San Juan, Puerto Rico. The aircraft struck navigational equipment, a Ford van owned by airline cleaning contractor Professional Ocean Service Corp., a perimeter fence, and a Toyota SUV on a nearby road. Five people were killed, including van driver Yoel Rodriguez Naranjo, 53, and four colleagues—Rolando Aleman Leon, 55; Julio C. Pineda, 75; Carlos Acosta Fajardo, 53; and Javierkys Reyes Quevedo, 47—and five others were injured; the two pilots, Captain Joseph Carroll and first officer Jaime Felipe Silva Molina, survived. Three days later, Naranjo’s widow, Yaraisi Santiso Morejon, filed a wrongful death lawsuit naming Amazon, Amazon Air Cargo, 21 Air, and the two pilots as defendants. National Transportation Safety Board investigators said flight-data recordings showed thrust briefly increased in a manner consistent with a go-around, after which throttles were reduced to idle and brakes reapplied, and that speed brakes and thrust reversers were not deployed; they have not determined a cause.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 3 articles
2 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 3
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: National Transportation Safety Board, Miami-Dade Sheriff’s Office and Yaraisi Santiso Morejon
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 3 of 3
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: court filing
- Credits another outlet 0 of 3
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 3
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 9, 16:47 UTC by NBC News, naming its source. First document in the first report, from NBC News (court filing).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Right-leaning coverage treats the suit as a claim the jet was unfit to fly; left-leaning coverage never names the aircraft's owner or its age. The complaint, per Fox Business, accuses Atlas Air of sending a 32-year-old plane whose stopping systems were not kept safe. Left-leaning coverage in NBC News lists Amazon, 21 Air, and the surviving pilots as defendants and stays silent on airworthiness. That split decides whether a reader sees a landing-error case or a claim the machine should not have been in the air.
Left-leaning coverage labels the wreck an "Amazon-branded plane," holding the retailer at a remove from the operator. Right-leaning coverage calls it an Amazon jet and centers the company's duty to oversee the flight.
Why thrust came up as if for a go-around and then fell to idle with the speed brakes still stowed goes unasked.
Bottom line
NBC News never tells readers the widow's complaint names Atlas Air or calls the cargo jet 32 years old; Fox Business does both.
The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Lawsuit accuses Atlas Air of supplying a 32-year-old plane
- Pilots allegedly landed more than 40 knots faster than recommended
- Amazon said using independent air carriers is standard practice in commercial aviation
- Flight data showed thrust rise consistent with a go-around, then idle four seconds later
- Suit alleges prior safety complaints were ignored and crews flew without proper rest
- Four other dead workers were named, with neighbors recalling them as kind and jovial
The Left View
Left-leaning coverage centers the dead cleaning-crew workers and the lawsuit’s claim that the crash was a “foreseeable and preventable result of multiple, concurrent failures.” NBC News highlights attorney Mike Morgan’s accusations that the pilots attempted a “high-speed, tailwind-affected landing,” “grossly overshot” the runway “by over 1,000 feet,” came in “grossly over the speed that they should have been attempting,” and that the aircraft “should have made a fly-around attempt”; he said cockpit audio sounded “like a lot of confusion.” The same reporting lingers on neighbors’ and relatives’ remembrances of the victims and notes Amazon’s expression of “deepest sympathies” and pledge to cooperate, while stressing that investigators have not assigned a cause.
The Right View
Right-leaning coverage presents the suit as an attack on “botched landing maneuvers, aircraft safety failures” stretching across Amazon’s contractor network. Fox Business reports allegations that the jet landed more than 40 knots faster than recommended, touched down 4,000 feet past the target zone, failed a proper nose-flare, and did not execute a mandatory go-around or declare an emergency, and quotes Morejon saying, “This disaster was not an unavoidable accident.” It also relays claims that 21 Air skimped on training and rest, ignored prior safety complaints, allowed pilots with limited English, and kept troubled aircraft flying, and that Atlas Air supplied a 32-year-old plane whose stopping systems were not fully operational. The outlet gives Amazon’s rebuttal prominent play: that jets flown on its behalf use FAA-certified carriers under FAA-approved programs and that contracting independent operators is “standard practice in commercial aviation,” while noting a decline in Amazon’s share price.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that recorder evidence of an aborted go-around and undeployed speed brakes and thrust reversers, paired with plaintiffs’ claims of excess speed and a long touchdown, supports treating the deaths as “foreseeable and preventable” rather than a freak accident. The right’s strongest argument is the complaint’s chain-of-responsibility case—specific alleged deviations (more than 40 knots over recommended speed; touchdown 4,000 feet past the target) plus training, rest, language, and aging-aircraft claims at 21 Air and Atlas—set against Amazon’s evidence that FAA-certified independent contractors are industry-standard. The central unresolved tension is whether, once the NTSB finishes, blame will rest on cockpit decisions in the final seconds of landing or on how Amazon’s contracted cargo operation trained, scheduled, and maintained the flight.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.