White House dismisses negative economic polling
Left 67%
Center 0%
Right 33%
2 left · 0 center · 1 right
What happened
On Friday, White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett discussed the September U.S. jobs report—which showed 29,000 jobs added—on Bloomberg Open Interest and on Fox Business Network’s “Varney & Co.” Asked whether that figure was disappointing, Hassett said the report “came in as expected” and that he was “not even a little bit” disappointed. He attributed the results to President Trump’s supply-side policies, saying government employment fell while other employment rose, factory-related construction was up about 12,000, and about 112,000 people were building factories who had not been doing so when Trump took office. He also cited an upward GDP revision driven by capital spending, a three-month moving average of core PCE inflation at a 2 percent annual rate (1 percent including food and energy), GDP “hovering around 4 percent,” a forecast of strong holiday consumer spending, and the need for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to decide whether to remain on the Fed Board of Governors.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 3 articles
3 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 3 of 3
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Kevin Hassett
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 3
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: jobs report, economic data
- Credits another outlet 0 of 3
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 3
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 3, 01:56 UTC by Breitbart, naming its source. First document in the first report, from Breitbart (jobs report).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
The left-leaning coverage never shows the White House being asked if the jobs print was a disappointment, so a reader cannot see the administration's rebuttal. Right-leaning coverage is built around that exchange. Bloomberg reports that Hassett said the September jobs report came in as expected, then turns to Powell, bonds, and debt. Breitbart instead carries Hassett saying he was "Not even a little bit" disappointed and arguing that supply-side policy is realigning the economy. He also cited construction hiring and a GDP revision driven by capital spending on factories.
Left-leaning coverage treats the jobs comments as one stop in a grab-bag interview that also flags whether Jerome Powell will stay on the Fed board. Right-leaning coverage leads with the disappointment denial and never mentions Powell, bonds, or paying down U.S. debt.
Did September hiring actually match the forecast Hassett called expected?
Bottom line
Read Bloomberg and you hear the jobs report came in as expected; read Breitbart and you hear Hassett refuse to be disappointed by 29,000 jobs.
The receipts — 4 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Hassett said he was "Not even a little bit" disappointed in the jobs numbers
- Hassett said government employment was down while employment for everything else was up
- Hassett said factory construction was up about 12,000 jobs
- Hassett said 112,000 people are building factories who were not doing so when President Trump took office
The Left View
Bloomberg frames Hassett’s appearance as a markets-oriented briefing in which he treated the payroll print as matching expectations rather than as a shortfall. It foregrounds his prediction that holiday consumer spending will be strong and his remark that Powell has to decide whether to stay on the Fed board, and it notes the conversation also covered bonds and paying down U.S. debt. The coverage does not adopt the “disappointed” question or cast the 29,000 gain as a political test of the administration.
The Right View
Breitbart frames the same comments as a rebuttal of disappointment and as proof that Trump’s supply-side policy is “realigning the American economy in a very positive way.” It highlights Hassett’s contrast between falling government jobs and rising private and construction employment, the factory-building headcount since Trump took office, the GDP revision from factory capital spending, and his claim that a supply-side boom “puts downward pressure on inflation,” with policies yielding “low inflation and high growth.” Host Stuart Varney’s premise—that investors and the Fed would like the report even if the White House might not—is used to set up Hassett’s flat rejection.
Our Take (balanced)
The left-leaning coverage’s strongest point is procedural: treating 29,000 jobs as “as expected” and moving on to holiday demand and Powell avoids inflating a single payroll print into a verdict on the expansion. The right-leaning coverage’s strongest point is compositional: Hassett’s figures on government versus private jobs, factory construction, an investment-led GDP revision, and PCE at 2 percent core / 1 percent including food and energy, if accurate, would mean the headline gain understates a supply-side boom with cooling inflation. The central unresolved tension is whether the modest September payroll number should be read as an unremarkable print consistent with expectations, or as a misleading headline that conceals a policy-driven realignment visible mainly in factory building, capital spending, and inflation.
2 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.