OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Judge Blocks Deportation of Immigrant Shot by ICE in Texas

5 sources · updated 2026-09-24
Left 67% Center 33% Right 0%
2 left · 1 center · 0 right

What happened

Wilber Garcés Pérez, a Venezuelan national, was shot in the back by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer in Austin, Texas, and then detained. His attorney, Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch, said he was taken to an immigration facility with a bullet still lodged in his back and was later hospitalized after his condition worsened, with the lawyer reporting partial paralysis. Lincoln-Goldfinch said Pérez had a work permit and was seeking asylum but had missed a deportation order sent to an old address. A judge subsequently blocked his deportation. Pérez, through his lawyer, said he was not doing well and returned to the hospital.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 3 articles

2 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It started with unnamed sources; a named source appeared 5 hours later.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 2 of 3
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Wilber Garcés Pérez's attorney, Judge Orlando Garcia, Kate Lincoln-Goldfinch and Department of Homeland Security
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 3
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: court order
Credits another outlet 0 of 3
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 1 of 3
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this. Here: e.g. “his attorney”
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 22, 18:13 UTC by Washington Post, with no named source. First named source 5 hours later, from CBS News. First document 5 hours later, from BBC (court order).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK. Only left-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days; Washington Examiner reported it on 2026-09-21.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

The incident is missing from right-leaning coverage entirely and has been told so far only on the left. Left-leaning coverage reports a Venezuelan man shot by an ICE officer in Texas who returned to the hospital after being taken to an immigration facility with a "bullet still lodged in his back." Separate reporting names Wilber Garcés Pérez and describes partial paralysis after his condition worsened. A reader of the silent side would not know that an ICE shooting victim was rehospitalized at all. Left-leaning outlets split what they emphasize. One account leads with the remaining bullet after a detention stay. The other leads with paralysis and the patient's name. What did the ICE officer report happened in the moments before he fired?
Bottom line

Right-leaning outlets have not reported that an ICE officer shot a Venezuelan man in Texas who The Hill says was taken to an immigration facility with a bullet still lodged in his back.

The receipts — 3 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Wilber Garcés Pérez was transferred to a hospital for partial paralysis after his condition worsened. individual casein The Washington Post · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • He had a work permit and was seeking asylum but had missed a deportation order sent to an old address. contextin CBS News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • A judge blocked the deportation of Wilber Garcés Pérez. legal rulingin CBS News · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
The Hill and The Washington Post report that Pérez was shot and wounded by an ICE officer in Texas, then hospitalized after being taken to an immigration facility with a bullet still in his back, citing his attorney on a worsened condition and partial paralysis. They frame the episode around the shooting, detention, and subsequent medical decline. CBS News reports the same shooting in Austin, that Pérez said he is not doing well and returned to the hospital, that his lawyer said he had a work permit and was seeking asylum but missed a deportation order sent to an old address, and that a judge blocked his deportation.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it names the injured man, his attorney, the agency and city involved, and follow-on events (hospitalization, a reported judicial block on deportation) that can be checked against records. Established across outlets is that Pérez was shot in the back by an ICE officer in Austin and later hospitalized. Claims of partial paralysis, a bullet left lodged, work-permit and asylum status, and a missed order at an old address are attributed to his attorney and are not independently documented in the coverage provided. These reports do not include an official ICE account of why the officer fired. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch next for an ICE incident statement, court filings on the deportation stay, and medical or investigative records on the shooting and injuries.

5 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.