Trump Reviews Post-9/11 Airport Security Measures
Left 67%
Center 17%
Right 17%
4 left · 1 center · 1 right
What happened
Around the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 al-Qaeda attacks that used hijacked commercial jets as weapons, the Trump administration has begun easing some airport security measures adopted afterward. Last year the Department of Homeland Security allowed most travelers to keep their shoes on at checkpoints, reversing a rule imposed after Richard Reid's failed December 2001 attempt to ignite explosives hidden in a shoe. This week the Transportation Security Administration launched Gateside, a free program at 13 U.S. airports that lets eligible TSA PreCheck members apply one to three days in advance for access to secure gate areas without a boarding pass, access largely closed to non-ticketed visitors since 2001. TSA also recently scrapped a TSA Gold+ plan that would have privatized screening at some airports; new TSA Administrator David Cummins, who took office in early August, said a replacement screening partnership program would "better harness the role of the private sector in delivering a safer, more secure, and more efficient aviation system." Official 3.4-ounce limits on carry-on liquids, adopted after a 2006 foiled plot to smuggle liquid explosives onto transatlantic flights, remain in effect, though some airports now use scanners that let travelers leave liquids in their bags.
Sourcing check · Partly on the record · 6 articles
2 of 5 articles cite a named source for the story. It started with unnamed sources; a named source appeared 1 hour later.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 5
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Transportation Security Administration, Jeff Price, Arik Arad and Department of Homeland Security
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 5
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
- Credits another outlet 0 of 5
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 5
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 11, 10:00 UTC by The Hill, with no named source. First named source 1 hour later, from CNBC.
- Not counted 1
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Airport rules put in place after the attacks are being rolled back in left-leaning coverage and are treated as a finished build-up in right-leaning coverage. Shoes-on screening and a gate pass for trusted travelers appear in CNBC's anniversary account, which is simply more complete on what is changing now. No rollback appears in the Washington Examiner, which describes a transformation of checkpoints, cockpits, and bags that evolved to counter new threats.
Left-leaning coverage leads with restrictions coming off. Right-leaning coverage leads instead with an air-travel process that "in no way resembles" the one travelers knew at the turn of the century and presents that change as the industry meeting new attacks rather than loosening old rules.
What did the White House say it reviewed, and which post-9/11 rules did it decide to keep?
Bottom line
A Washington Examiner reader would think airport security only tightened after the attacks; CNBC is the one that reports the shoe rule is over and non-flyers can return to the gate.
The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
- TSA launched Gateside at 13 U.S. airports, letting PreCheck members enter the gate area without a boarding pass
- The Department of Homeland Security said flyers can leave their shoes on at airport checkpoints
- TSA scrapped its TSA Gold+ privatized screening program
- The Trump administration is pushing for greater privatization of airport screening
- A 2015 internal DHS investigation found TSA failed to detect weapons and fake explosives 95 percent of the time
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets present the changes as a long-delayed easing of post-9/11 travel rules that had become everyday inconvenience, while flagging privacy costs and unfinished security questions. CNBC describes the United States as "starting to ease some of the restrictions" after nearly 25 years of shoes-off screening and barred gate farewells, and quotes aviation professor Jeff Price on PreCheck: "If you've got a few bucks, yeah, you can reduce the amount of screening and jump the line," but members "give up a lot more of [their] personal data to the government." Those sources also treat the privatization push as rocky: Tampa International Airport opted out of TSA Gold+ because, COO John Tiliacos said, officials "weren't quite satisfied that we were getting all of the answers to our questions regarding the technology." Business Insider notes a 2015 internal DHS investigation found TSA failed to detect weapons and fake explosives carried by undercover agents 95 percent of the time. Experts they quote argue threats have shifted toward AI, cybersecurity, and drones, with former TSA official Keith Jeffries saying, "There is no such thing as the perfect security mousetrap."
The Right View
The Washington Examiner frames the quarter-century since 9/11 as an overhaul of air travel "in ways that few other industries have," citing federalized screening, hardened cockpits, passenger vetting, and baggage screening. It describes today's process as one that "in no way resembles the one that existed at the turn of the century" and that "has evolved repeatedly over the past two and a half decades to meet and counter emerging threats as technology improves and new types of aviation-aligned attacks are thwarted." Available right-leaning coverage treats adaptation to new threats, rather than rollback of old rules, as the central story of airport security since the attacks.
Our Take (balanced)
Left-leaning coverage's strongest argument is that several checkpoint rules have outlasted the plots that produced them and now mainly impose time and privacy costs—supported by the shoe-rule reversal, Gateside's limited return of non-ticketed gate access, Price's description of PreCheck as a data-for-speed trade, Tampa's technology questions, and the 2015 finding of a 95 percent miss rate in undercover tests. The right-leaning framing's strongest argument is that after hijackers turned airliners into weapons, aviation security had to be rebuilt as a continually updated system, and that the current apparatus "has evolved repeatedly... to meet and counter emerging threats" rather than simply being dismantled. The central unresolved tension is whether easing specific checkpoint rules and expanding private-sector screening is calibration to better technology and different threats, or a weakening of layered post-9/11 defenses whose deterrent value is hard to measure by any single test.
6 sources
- 25 years after 9/11, airport security gets second look from Trump
- 25 years after 9/11, the U.S. starts rolling back travel restrictions, from liquids to gate access
- Vintage photos show what airport security was like before 9/11
- 25 years later, 9/11 still shapes the way we fly. Here's how air travel changed after the attacks.
- How airport security has transformed in the 25 years since 9/11
- 25 years after 9/11, airport security gets second look from Trump
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.