OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Stubborn Inflation Raises Prospect of Fed Rate Hike

13 sources · updated 2026-09-13
Left 80% Center 0% Right 20%
4 left · 0 center · 1 right

What happened

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the Consumer Price Index rose 0.4 percent in August and 3.4 percent from a year earlier, matching July’s annual pace. Core prices, which exclude food and energy, rose 0.3 percent for the month — above many economists’ forecasts — and 2.4 percent over 12 months. Gasoline prices increased 3.9 percent in August, accounting for more than one-third of the monthly all-items gain, and were 27.4 percent higher than a year earlier. A separate BLS report showed average hourly earnings up 3.1 percent over the year, while real average hourly earnings fell 0.1 percent from July to August and 0.3 percent from a year earlier. After the release, market-implied odds of a Federal Reserve interest-rate increase at the Sept. 15–16 meeting rose into the mid-80s to about 90 percent.
Sourcing check · Partly on the record · 5 articles

1 of 4 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 1 of 4
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Seema Shah, Omair Sharif and Bureau of Labor Statistics
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 3 of 4
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: official statistics, official data, market data, company release
Credits another outlet 0 of 4
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 4
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 11, 17:38 UTC by New York Post, naming its source. First document in the first report, from New York Post (official statistics).
Not counted 1
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage reports that inflation is again outrunning pay; right-leaning coverage omits the earnings data that would show it. Hourly earnings rose 3.1 percent over the year, slower than prices, and real pay fell from July, according to CNBC. The same monthly drop in real average hourly earnings appears in NBC News. Right-leaning coverage details gasoline, food, and rent without those pay figures, so a reader there cannot tell whether 3.4 percent inflation is beating wages. Left-leaning coverage leads with a White House clash over rates; right-leaning coverage skips that opposition and flags a spending pledge. The clash appears as a "Rate Hike That Trump Opposes" in Bloomberg. A $5,000 check to every adult, which could add to price pressure, is the Trump angle in the New York Post. What is inflation running at now that the survey has missed this week's jump in crude and diesel?
Bottom line

The 3.4 percent inflation print is in every account. Only left-leaning outlets reported that real hourly earnings fell in August, so a Fox Business reader never hears that prices are beating pay again.

The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Real average hourly earnings fell 0.1% from July to August and were down 0.3% from a year earlier numberin CNBC, NBC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Computer software, accessories and related items rose 25.4% over the last year, the largest yearly increase on record numberin NBC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The gasoline index rose 27.4% from a year ago numberin Fox Business, New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Fuel oil jumped 10.1% in August and is 52% higher than a year earlier numberin New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Trump said, "Right after the election, oil prices are going to be tumbling downward" official statementin NBC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Tit-for-tat U.S.-Canada tariffs are threatening prices on milk, cheese, steel, aluminum and household appliances contextin New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets treated the report as showing that the country “still has an inflation problem.” NBC News and CNBC emphasized an upside surprise in core prices that they said opened the door to a hike the following week, which would add pressure on households already facing high borrowing costs; CNBC’s Heather Long said “inflation is wiping out wage gains” after earlier catch-up reversed with the spring energy spike, and that a “substantial number of Americans are worse off.” They tied energy strength to the Iran war that began in February and argued the August survey already looks stale after later jumps in crude and diesel. CNBC framed the meeting as a “defining test” for Fed Chair Kevin Warsh: having said at Jackson Hole that prices should be the Fed’s “predominant focus,” a hold would make it harder to show he is in control, while President Donald Trump has pushed for rate cuts; the network reported a theory of a tacit arrangement not to hike before the Nov. 3 midterms, while stating there is no evidence Warsh has considered anything but his reading of the economy. The Washington Post, which described annual inflation as holding steady and rising as expected, still cast “stubborn” prices as leaving Republicans with higher costs past the midterms; Bloomberg said the print pushed the Fed toward a hike “that Trump opposes.”
The Right View
Fox Business and the New York Post described the headline figures as in line with forecasts yet still “elevated” and “too hot,” with the monthly core rise slightly above estimates. They said the print made a September hike nearly certain — “all but assured,” as one Post source put it — and that after Warsh’s Jackson Hole comments it was “time to put up or shut up,” or he would become “the boy who cried wolf.” Right-leaning accounts attributed much of the monthly increase to gasoline amid the Iran conflict, while highlighting cooler categories: food at home was unchanged, eggs were down 23 percent from a year earlier, and apparel was flat, which the Post said suggested tariffs had “seemingly finished working their way through the economy.” Fox quoted Long saying inflation was “more than just high gas and diesel prices” and that the Fed “needs to hike in September to prevent this from worsening.” The Post also pointed to pressures the CPI did not fully capture, including renewed Iran hostilities, tit-for-tat tariffs with Canada, and Trump’s promise of a $5,000 check to every American adult if Republicans hold Congress.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is the household squeeze in the paired BLS earnings data: inflation outpaced wage growth, real hourly pay fell, and Long described prior improvement as having “blown up,” with bank spending data showing households trading down to Costco and Aldi “almost across the income spectrum.” The right’s strongest argument is institutional credibility: a hotter monthly core reading while inflation remains above the Fed’s 2 percent target, on the heels of Warsh’s own warning that better summer prints “do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved,” makes a hold hard to reconcile with those words — the bind the Post conveyed as “put up or shut up.” The central unresolved tension is whether the coming decision will be judged as a response to still-high prices or as a political test of whether Warsh will raise rates against the president who appointed him and who wants cuts before the midterms.

13 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.