OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

US Inflation Rises to 3.7 Percent in September

5 sources · updated 2026-10-16
Left 40% Center 40% Right 20%
2 left · 2 center · 1 right

What happened

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Wednesday that the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers rose 0.6 percent in September on a seasonally adjusted basis, after a 0.4 percent increase in August, and that the all-items index was 3.7 percent higher over the previous 12 months. Higher energy prices contributed to the monthly rise; the food index was unchanged after 0.1 percent increases in each of the prior two months. The report was the last major inflation reading before the November 2026 midterm elections, in which Republicans hold majorities in the House and Senate. President Donald Trump said inflation remained low, while the White House and congressional Democrats issued competing statements on whether costs were coming down or still failing households.
Sourcing check · Rests on documents, no one quoted · 5 articles

No article quotes anyone; the reporting rests on official statistics. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 0 of 2
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: No article does.
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 2
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: official statistics
Credits another outlet 0 of 2
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 2
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 14, 18:21 UTC by Fox Business, naming its source. First document in the first report, from Fox Business (official statistics).
Not counted 3
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

The two sides do not describe the same inflation report. A reader would not know from one side what the other treats as the engine of the increase. Left-leaning coverage treats higher energy prices as the reason the yearly reading reached 3.7 percent, a driver the New York Times puts in its headline. Right-leaning coverage never names energy at all. Fox Business instead reports that the food index was unchanged and fills the column with Democratic attacks and a White House growth defense. Left-leaning coverage leads with price pressure on President Trump and the Federal Reserve ahead of the midterms. Right-leaning coverage leads with Democrats calling the president "a total failure" while the White House answers with growth, jobs, and tax cuts. How much of September's monthly increase came from energy, and how much from everything else?
Bottom line

Fox Business never mentions the energy-price driver that the New York Times treats as the story of the 3.7 percent reading, and the Times never mentions that food was reported unchanged.

The receipts — 2 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • White House spokesman Matthew Middleton cited temporary disruptions as a result of the Iran conflict official statementin Fox Business · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Pete Buttigieg said inflation is up because of Trump's war, tariffs, and corporate tax breaks official statementin Fox Business · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning coverage treated the September print as a late political problem for President Trump. The New York Times said it “will keep pressure on President Trump and the Federal Reserve to tame intensifying price pressures,” linking the move to higher energy prices ahead of the midterms. The Atlantic called it a check-in that “Doesn’t Look Good for Trump” and “the last word on inflation before the midterms.” Democrats used the same electoral frame: the House Democratic Caucus said he “promised to lower costs and end inflation on day one. The exact opposite has happened” and called him “a total failure”; Rep. Pete Aguilar said families were “paying more for everything”; Rep. Katherine Clark said “Inflation remains too high, as families struggle to afford the basics”; Sen. Chuck Schumer said Trump’s “‘Golden Age’ means never ending, higher prices”; and Pete Buttigieg said prices rose “Not because of a pandemic. Not because of a natural disaster. Because of Trump’s war, tariffs, and corporate tax breaks.”
The Right View
Right-leaning coverage cast Democratic attacks as partisan while amplifying White House claims of growth and cooling from the prior administration. A White House official said Trump “is bringing inflation down after it was astronomically high under Biden” and that food prices “remain stable, unchanged, month-over-month,” matching the unchanged food index. Spokesman Matthew Middleton said an “aggressive, pro-growth economic agenda” had “blunted Biden’s inflation crisis, driven economic growth, increased wages and created private-sector jobs,” described price effects as “temporary disruptions as a result of the Iran conflict,” and cited “the largest working-class tax cuts in history,” lower prescription-drug costs, “more than one million private-sector jobs,” and “nearly 20 trade deals.” He said the administration “will continue to deliver economic wins for the American people over the next two years” and that Democrats “pretend to care about ‘affordability.’”
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that an accelerating monthly reading, driven in part by energy and arriving as the last CPI print before the midterms, undercuts Trump’s pledge to end inflation immediately; Buttigieg’s line that the rise comes from “war, tariffs, and corporate tax breaks” is the sharpest causal claim they offer. The right’s strongest argument is the unchanged food index plus the White House’s growth, jobs, and “blunted Biden’s inflation crisis” framing, which treats the September jump as a temporary overlay—including from the Iran conflict—on a longer cooling path. The central unresolved tension is whether the 3.7 percent year-over-year rate shows Trump’s policy mix pushing prices back up, or a still-elevated but improving picture relative to the Biden-era peak.

5 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.