Latin American Deportees Stranded in Liberia
Left 33%
Center 67%
Right 0%
1 left · 2 center · 0 right
What happened
On Aug. 20, a U.S. deportation flight landed in Monrovia, Liberia, carrying 15 people who are not Liberian citizens, under an agreement in which Liberia said it would accept up to 1,200 third-country deportees. The group included nationals of Brazil, Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras and Venezuela, as well as some from other African countries; they have been housed in a hotel and given basic aid by the U.N. migration agency. Several said they were not told they were being sent to Liberia until they arrived and that they lack passports, visas or legal status there. Some had previously been granted protection by U.S. immigration judges against removal to their countries of origin. The Department of Homeland Security said the people were in the United States illegally, that self-deportation with a stipend was available, and that the administration is using lawful options to carry out deportations.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 3 articles
2 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 2
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Elvis Rodriguez Venturas, Arin Garcia Yepes, Yasmany Moreno de Armas and Human Rights First
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 2
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
- Credits another outlet 0 of 2
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 1 of 2
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 15, 12:09 UTC by CBS News, naming its source.
- Not counted 1
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
BLINDSPOT.
Only left-leaning outlets are covering this story
— the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage casts third-country deportation as a mass exile into African danger with no way out, and right-leaning outlets have not covered the story. The 25,000 third-country tally appears in ABC News, which also interviews Cubans flown to the Central African Republic who say they cannot leave. Missing from that account is Liberia's intake of 15 people, who are not being detained. A reader of the silent side would not know these flights exist. A reader of ABC News would not know the Liberia group is small and unconfined.
Left-leaning coverage quotes a man in the Central African Republic who says, "We're prisoners here." The Liberia arrivals described by CBS News are not being detained, so the captivity line does not describe that hotel stay.
Did anyone sent to Liberia get a hearing on that destination, or only a bar on being returned home?
Bottom line
ABC News told readers about 25,000 third-country removals and Cubans stuck in the Central African Republic, not the 15-person Liberia group CBS News found in a hotel. Right-leaning outlets have not published the story.
The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Liberia has so far received 15 non-Liberian deportees, on a single Aug. 20 flight
- Most of the Liberia deportees interviewed had won immigration-court protection against removal to their home countries
- CBS News could not find a criminal charge or conviction beyond immigration violations for the vast majority sent to Liberia
- Liberia agreed to receive up to 1,200 third-country deportees from the United States
- The U.S. has spent nearly $50 million on third-country deportation deals
- DHS said the men were deported to a safe country and that it is applying the law as written
The Left View
ABC News reported on Latin American immigrants, including Cubans, sent to the Central African Republic and described third-country removals as a ramped-up practice affecting roughly 25,000 people, according to Human Rights First. It quoted deportees saying they feel kidnapped and in legal limbo without documents, and an attorney saying people were sent without notice or a chance to object; DHS told ABC the men were deported to a “safe country” and that the agency is applying the law as written. CBS News interviewed in person the Latin American deportees from the Aug. 20 Liberia flight, who described being stranded far from family in the United States; CBS reported it could not find criminal convictions for the vast majority beyond immigration violations. Liberia is not detaining them. Advocates framed the policy as cruel and lacking due process; officials framed it as lawful enforcement.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it rests on named individuals, an identified Aug. 20 flight of 15 people, on-the-ground interviews in Monrovia, a Liberian government statement about taking up to 1,200 deportees, and on-the-record DHS comments. Established facts include that ICE sent non-Liberians to Liberia under a third-country arrangement; that at least some had been barred from removal to their home countries; and that they currently lack clear legal status or travel documents there. Advocate figures (about 25,000 third-country removals and nearly $50 million in deals) and labels such as “kidnapped” remain alleged or advocacy-sourced in the coverage provided. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for disclosure of the Liberia agreement, court filings on third-country removals, records of who was sent, and whether further flights or asylum processing follow.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.