OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Trump Defends Waiving Russia Sanctions to Aid Talks

8 sources · updated 2026-10-19
Left 88% Center 12% Right 0%
7 left · 1 center · 0 right

What happened

Late Friday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order waiving new U.S. sanctions and tariffs on Russia that were due to take effect two days later. Those measures had been required under a bill named for the late Sen. Lindsey Graham that Trump signed one month earlier. On Sunday, Energy Secretary Chris Wright defended the waiver on ABC’s “This Week,” calling it an incentive to end the war in Ukraine rather than an economic lifeline for Moscow. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said the decision was wrong and helps only Russia; Darline Graham, who succeeded Lindsey Graham in the Senate, said she disagreed and would keep pressure on Moscow. Trump also posted that the waiver keeps Russia at the negotiating table, after recently announcing a prospective deal to import millions of tons of Russian diesel despite a 2022 U.S. law banning Russian energy imports.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 8 articles

5 of 8 articles cite a named source for the story. It started with unnamed sources; a named source appeared 15 hours later.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 5 of 8
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Chris Wright, Darline Graham, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Donald Trump, Thom Tillis and Scott Bessent
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 8
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: social media post
Credits another outlet 0 of 8
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 1 of 8
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this. Here: e.g. “The Trump administration is ignoring the will of Congress”
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 17, 23:46 UTC by New York Times, with no named source. First named source 15 hours later, from ABC News. First document the next day, from The Hill (social media post).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK. Only left-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days; Washington Examiner reported it on 2026-10-17.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication, so the gap that changes a reader's understanding is the waiver itself. Left-leaning coverage reports that Trump signed an order waiving new Russia sanctions two days before they took effect. Those punishments were required under a bill named for Lindsey Graham that he had signed a month earlier. Wright told ABC News the move is "not an economic lifeline," and the same coverage records objections from Zelenskyy and from Darline Graham. The Sunday lead is split. ABC News opens on Wright's television defense, while The Hill leads a companion item with Trump's claim that the waiver "keeps Moscow at the negotiating table." A diesel-import deal despite a 2022 law banning Russian energy appears in ABC News, a clash The Hill's Wright piece does not mention. What legal power lets the president waive sanctions a statute he signed required to take effect this week?
Bottom line

A right-leaning reader would miss that Trump waived Graham-required Russia sanctions, and that ABC News quoted Wright calling the waiver "not an economic lifeline."

The receipts — 2 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Wright said Russia gets benefit from the waiver only if it exports diesel by consuming less internally, reducing the war effort, or repairing refineries through a peace agreement official statementin ABC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Wright said there have never been sanctions nearly as strong on Russia as under the Trump administration official statementin ABC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
ABC News, The Hill, and The New York Times reported Wright’s and Trump’s defenses of the waiver. ABC News quoted Wright saying Russia would benefit only by exporting diesel, which would require using less fuel at home, cutting the war effort, or repairing refineries through a peace deal or energy ceasefire; Wright also said Trump-era sanctions on Russia are the strongest yet and blamed Democrats for making energy costly. The Hill reported Trump’s Truth Social post that the decision is about negotiating peace and Wright’s claim the waiver is not an economic lifeline. The New York Times described the move as a reversal of nearly five years of sanctions tied to peace talks and said Trump hinted at a hostage deal without naming a hostage. NewsNation reported Trump’s argument that the waiver keeps Moscow at the table and his criticism of Zelenskyy for resuming strikes on Russian oil refineries. Outlets also carried Zelenskyy’s rebuke, Darline Graham’s dissent, bipartisan backlash over the diesel deal, diesel prices above $6 a gallon, and competing claims about what is driving those prices.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it is anchored in a signed executive order, a recently enacted Graham-named sanctions law, named officials, a Sunday television interview, and a public presidential post. Established facts include the Friday waiver of sanctions that were about to take effect, Wright’s on-the-record defense, Zelenskyy’s and Darline Graham’s public objections, and Trump’s stated rationale of keeping Russia in talks. Still disputed or uncorroborated are whether the waiver is an economic lifeline, whether it actually pressures Russia, Wright’s claim that current U.S. sanctions are the strongest ever, how a diesel-import deal squares with the 2022 import ban, and any unnamed hostage arrangement. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for the executive order’s text, the legal basis for waiving a statutory sanctions trigger, any documents on diesel imports or hostages, and formal responses from Congress and allied governments.

8 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.