Trump Uses Anti-Trans Slur Against SC Senate Candidate
Left 67%
Center 0%
Right 33%
2 left · 0 center · 1 right
What happened
On Monday, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social about the South Carolina U.S. Senate race, writing that “Annie ‘Trannie’ Andrews is running against our wonderful Darline Graham for the Senate in South Carolina.” Andrews, a Democrat and a physician, is challenging Republican Sen. Darline Graham. In the same post, Trump said his “dear friend Lindsey” had called Graham “the finest, most reliable, and one of the smartest people I have ever known” and “the most loyal,” and that he had often been upset with Lindsey for saying so because he thought he had those qualities. The Hill reported that Trump used the term several times and that the post evoked Graham’s late brother.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 3 articles
3 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 3 of 3
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: President Trump, Donald Trump, Human Rights Campaign, Chuck Schumer and David Beasley
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 3
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: social media post
- Credits another outlet 0 of 3
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 3
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 5, 23:04 UTC by The Hill, naming its source. First document within the hour, from Washington Examiner (social media post).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage reports that Trump used an anti-transgender slur several times, and right-leaning coverage never mentions repetition. Left-leaning coverage at The Hill says the president used a slur several times against Dr. Annie Andrews as he attacked Sen. Darline Graham's opponent. Right-leaning coverage at the Washington Examiner quotes a single Truth Social post and does not describe another use. Readers of the right-leaning account have no way to know the left-leaning account counted more than one instance.
Left-leaning coverage calls it an "anti-transgender slur." Right-leaning coverage calls the same attack a "nickname."
What in Annie Andrews' record or identity, if anything, did the label refer to?
Bottom line
The Hill counted Trump's language against Annie Andrews as something he used several times, a frequency the Washington Examiner does not report.
The receipts — 2 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Trump evoked Graham's late brother
- Trump's post quoted Lindsey calling Darline the finest, most reliable, and most loyal
The Left View
The Hill framed Trump’s wording as an “anti-transgender slur,” stressed that he used it “several times,” and placed the remarks in a contest it said “tightens.” It rendered the epithet as “T——” rather than printing it, and treated the invocation of Graham’s late brother as part of the same episode.
The Right View
The Washington Examiner described Trump as having “mocked” Andrews and “dubbed” her with that nickname “in an effort to discredit her.” It printed the nickname in full, set it inside the post’s praise of Graham drawn from Lindsey, and did not call the wording a slur.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is lexical and situational: the word is a recognized anti-transgender slur, and The Hill’s account of repeated use while the race “tightens” supports reading it as stigma aimed at a rival. The right’s strongest argument is the Examiner’s “mocks” / “nickname” / “to discredit her” reading, backed by the rest of the post, which is largely praise of Graham in Trump’s usual nickname style. The central unresolved tension is whether the epithet’s anti-transgender meaning defines the event or is incidental to conventional campaign insult.
2 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.