OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Kalshi Probes Suspicious Bets on Press Secretary Pick

21 sources · updated 2026-10-11
Left 50% Center 50% Right 0%
1 left · 1 center · 0 right

What happened

President Donald Trump announced Friday on Truth Social that he had appointed Katie Zacharia, a conservative commentator and senior communications adviser at Trump Media & Technology Group, as White House press secretary. She succeeds Karoline Leavitt, who left the post in late August after the birth of her second child and has since been hired as a Fox News contributor. Zacharia, a California attorney with undergraduate and law degrees from Pepperdine University, served about two months earlier this year as a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson and, Trump said, assisted his campaigns in swing states. Trump described her as having an "unblemished record of support" and as a "devoted fan and member of MAGA"; Zacharia called the appointment "the honor of a lifetime" and said she looked forward to working with the White House press corps to communicate the administration's record. A start date was not announced, and the briefing room has not hosted a press briefing since Vice President JD Vance took questions on September 3.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 17 articles

14 of 17 articles cite a named source for the story. It started with unnamed sources; a named source appeared within the hour.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 14 of 17
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: President Trump, Donald Trump, Katie Zacharia, White House officials, Donald J. Trump and White House official
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 17
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: social media post
Credits another outlet 3 of 17
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: The New York Times
Unnamed sources 4 of 17
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 9, 18:08 UTC by Bloomberg, with no named source. First named source within the hour, from The Hill. First document within the hour, from NBC News (social media post).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage presents this hire as a repair job after Trump said his message was not getting through. Right-leaning coverage omits those public remarks and treats the pick as a routine replacement. NBC News quotes him saying the White House is doing "an extremely poor job of promotion." The Guardian sets the appointment against falling approval and a looming midterm fight. Right-leaning write-ups repeat his public praise for her loyalty and leave that complaint out. Left-leaning coverage leads on personal allegiance, not the résumé. The Guardian headlines her as a "devoted fan," while The Daily Wire opens on her DHS and Truth Social titles. When will she take the podium in the briefing room, and will the regular sessions resume?
Bottom line

If you only saw right-leaning coverage, you would miss NBC News quoting Trump calling his public relations an extremely poor job just before he named Zacharia.

The receipts — 3 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Trump said shortly before the appointment that his administration was doing an extremely poor job of promotion official statementin NBC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Zacharia left DHS around the time Kristi Noem and Corey Lewandowski departed, and DHS officials were caught off guard by her selection contextin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Zacharia said she left DHS because of the strain of travel between California and Washington on her family contextin BBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets framed the appointment as a loyalty-first choice of a MAGA media figure, centering Trump's description of Zacharia as a "devoted fan and member of MAGA" with an "unblemished record of support." The Guardian placed the pick against falling approval ratings and a midterm Trump has treated as a referendum on his presidency, while the BBC cited a political scientist who said second-term appointments have been "based on personal affiliation and loyalty." Coverage stressed her limited government experience, her regular appearances on Fox News and Newsmax, and Trump's recent remarks that "we're not doing a good job of public relations" and that he has done "a very bad job of explaining how good the country is doing." NBC and others noted she often defends the administration on television and on social media.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets presented Zacharia as a lawyer, campaign veteran, and communicator suited to continue an aggressive defense of the administration. Daily Wire and Breitbart highlighted her Truth Social role, Pepperdine credentials, DHS tenure, and campaign work in swing states "where we won 7 out of 7," treating loyalty as a strength. They quoted her calling the job "the honor of a lifetime" and pledging to "get that record out," and noted Trump telling reporters she would be "terrific" and "a friend of most of you." The Daily Wire also pointed to a Fox News appearance in which she argued Trump had "re-energized the midterm elections" and that his policies on energy, the military, and the economy were on the ballot.
Our Take (balanced)
The left's strongest argument is that Trump filled a high-visibility communications job with a MAGA commentator whose chief public credential, in his own words, is being a "devoted fan," at a moment he himself says the White House is failing at public relations—backed by her brief federal tenure and a quoted scholar's claim that this term's appointments run on personal affiliation. The right's strongest argument is that this White House defines the press secretary's job as fighting for the president's record, and Zacharia's legal training, swing-state campaign work, conservative-media fluency, and stated intent to engage the press corps fit that mandate, as Trump's praise of Leavitt's "fantastic job" underscores. The central unresolved tension is whether a loyalty-first messenger can close the communications gap Trump has publicly acknowledged, or whether that same profile will further strain the relationship with the press the role is meant to manage.

21 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.