OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Trump Floats Renaming Strait of Hormuz After Himself

2 sources · updated 2026-09-04
Left 100% Center 0% Right 0%
2 left · 0 center · 0 right

What happened

On Wednesday, President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social asking whether the Strait of Hormuz should be renamed the Trump Strait, writing that it was now under U.S. control. The Strait of Hormuz is an international waterway between Iran and Oman; it is not U.S. territory and has no single owner. Later the same day at the White House, asked if he intended to rename the strait, Trump said he did not and that the idea was just thrown out there. The post followed earlier Trump administration efforts to rename the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America and a reported executive order directing the Interior Department to change Lake Ontario to Lake America in U.S. geographic records.
BLINDSPOT. Only left-leaning outlets are covering this story — the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication, leaving the episode only in left-leaning coverage. That coverage reports Trump floated renaming the Strait of Hormuz the Trump Strait after claiming U.S. control. CNBC also records his afternoon remark that it was "just thrown out there." Readers of the silent side miss both the proposal and the walk-back that decides whether the post was policy or a joke. Left-leaning coverage does not lead with the same fact. At CNBC the strait is first the hinge of a war the U.S. and Israel started. At The Hill the lead is the proposal plus the point that the waterway does not have a single owner. Was any federal agency directed to enter a new name on official maps, given the strait has no single owner and sits far from the United States?
Bottom line

Only CNBC recorded Trump saying a Hormuz rename was "just thrown out there," and right-leaning outlets had not reported the episode at all.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • When asked if he intended to rename the strait, Trump said it was just thrown out there. official statementin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright said more than 17 million barrels of oil transited the strait on Monday. numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Around 20 million barrels per day of crude and products passed through the strait before the conflict. numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Trump signed an executive order to change the name of Lake Ontario to Lake America. official statementin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The Strait of Hormuz is not near the United States. contextin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
The Hill and CNBC reported Trump’s Truth Social post proposing a Trump Strait name and noted the waterway has no single owner and is not near the United States. CNBC placed the post in the context of an ongoing U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran that began in late February, prior U.S. renaming of the Gulf of Mexico, a reported Lake Ontario order rejected by Canada, and map updates by some tech firms. Both outlets said it was unclear how any Hormuz name change would be implemented. They reported Trump later told reporters he was not serious. They also carried administration claims that Iran has lost control of the strait and that regional oil exports are higher than before the war, while noting tanker transits remain far below prewar levels; CNBC cited Energy Secretary Chris Wright saying more than 17 million barrels transited on Monday versus about 20 million barrels a day before the conflict.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive on the core event: a named, public presidential post and an on-the-record White House walk-back. Those two statements are established. Claims that the strait is under U.S. control, that oil exports have recovered, and details of prior renaming orders and map changes are administration or outlet-reported assertions and remain unverified here. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for whether the post stays up, any Interior Department or Geographic Names Information System action on Hormuz (none has been announced), responses from Oman, Iran, or hydrographic bodies, and independent ship-tracker figures on transits.

2 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.