Regulators Reject Grid Plan to Cut Data Center Power
Left 33%
Center 0%
Right 67%
1 left · 0 center · 2 right
What happened
The U.S. Department of Energy issued an emergency order under Section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act authorizing PJM Interconnection — the regional grid operator serving all or parts of Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, and Washington, D.C. — to use additional power generation and to run certain generating facilities beyond normal restrictions if needed to maintain supplies. The order, issued on a Monday, took effect the next day and remained in place through Friday, October 16, as temperatures in the Ohio Valley and Mid-Atlantic were expected to reach the 70s and 80s while some plants and transmission lines were offline for scheduled maintenance. PJM, which serves more than 60 million people, said it did not expect the emergency conditions to affect everyday customers. Separately, federal energy regulators rejected a PJM proposal to cut power to some large data centers during supply shortfalls, leaving that issue largely in the hands of states.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 3 articles
3 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 3 of 3
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, PJM, Chris Wright, PJM Interconnection, Jeff Shields and FERC
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 3
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: emergency order, regulatory order, regulatory filing
- Credits another outlet 0 of 3
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 3
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 13, 21:58 UTC by The Hill, naming its source. First document 4 hours later, from Fox News (emergency order).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
The two sides covered different federal actions on the same grid operator, and each omitted the other. Right-leaning coverage reports an Energy Department emergency order covering 13 states that lets PJM run extra generation to prevent blackouts. Left-leaning coverage reports that regulators blocked PJM from cutting power to large data centers during shortfalls, and does not mention that order. A reader who saw only one account would miss an entire federal intervention on reliability.
Right-leaning coverage leads with unseasonable October heat straining the grid during plant maintenance. Left-leaning coverage leads with a bid that regulators "shot down," then handed off to the states.
Is the data-center load PJM wanted to cut the same shortfall the emergency order is supposed to prevent?
Bottom line
The Hill never reports the Energy Department order that Fox News says is holding off blackouts in 13 states this week. Fox News never reports that regulators just refused to let PJM cut data-center power.
The receipts — 2 facts one side's coverage lacks
- PJM said it does not expect the emergency conditions to affect everyday customers
- The PJM grid serves more than 60 million Americans
The Left View
The Hill frames the grid-reliability fight around federal regulators shooting down PJM’s bid to cut power to large data centers during shortfalls, presenting the outcome as leaving the issue largely in the hands of states rather than with the regional operator.
The Right View
Fox News frames the Energy Department order as a Trump administration emergency action to prevent potential blackouts amid unusual October heat. It quotes Energy Secretary Chris Wright saying the order will help ensure “affordable, reliable and secure electricity” by making additional generation, including backup power, available as needed, and reports his argument that restrictions on conventional energy production under former President Joe Biden have weakened grid reliability. It also cites PJM spokesperson Jeff Shields that electricity demand is growing faster than new generating capacity can come online, that unpredictable weather is leaving fewer opportunities for maintenance and construction, and that planned maintenance periods now present reliability risks operators previously faced primarily during summer and winter.
Our Take (balanced)
The right’s strongest argument is that overlapping October heat and scheduled outages created a time-limited reliability risk, supported by PJM’s statements that demand is growing faster than new generating capacity and that planned maintenance now poses risks once confined to summer and winter. The left-leaning account’s strongest point is that federal regulators blocked PJM from solving shortfalls by cutting power to large data centers, leaving that choice with states. The central unresolved tension is whether mid-Atlantic grid stress is primarily a generation shortfall — which Wright attributes to prior restrictions on conventional energy — or a question of whether, and at what level of government, large new loads such as data centers can be curtailed when supply runs short.
3 sources
- Federal energy regulators shoot down grid operator’s plan to cut power to data centers during shortfalls
- Trump Energy Department issues emergency order to prevent blackouts across 13 states amid unusual October heat
- Federal Regulators Reject Largest US Grid Operator’s Plan To Cut Power To Data Centers
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.