OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Trump Encourages Canadian Companies to Relocate to US with No Tariffs

2 sources · updated 2026-09-01

What happened

President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social urging Canadian companies that do business with the United States to “move to the United States, immediately,” saying many had left years earlier “due to stupid U.S. Leadership” and that “When you move back, there are no TARIFFS.” In a radio interview with Glenn Beck, Trump called Canada “one of the worst countries in the world to deal with” and said it has “taken advantage of the United States for many decades.” In a separate Truth Social post, he said that starting January 1, 2027, he would impose 50 percent tariffs on Canadian cars, trucks, automotive parts, and steel, arguing Canadian tariffs on U.S. farm products had created a $60 billion deficit that is “Not sustainable, and NOT ANYMORE.” The administration also approved a temporary lift of tariffs on 300,000 metric tons of foreign beef inputs to take effect in September; White House spokesman Kush Desai said the U.S. beef market has “insufficient supply to meet consumer demand” and that the American cattle herd is at a multi-decade low.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage never reports President Trump's invitation for Canadian companies to relocate to the United States with no tariffs. Right-leaning coverage makes that invitation the story and adds a later threat of new duties on Canadian vehicles and steel. An ABC News reader instead learns only that a U.S.-Canada trade fight worries farmers already angry about a pause on foreign beef tariffs. Right-leaning coverage quotes Trump that Canada has been "ripping off" the United States. Left-leaning coverage instead highlights a Kansas farmer who still sees Canada as a pretty good neighbor, and spends most of its space on ranchers and GOP senators fighting a plan to import more beef. Have any Canadian companies said they will move, and what authority would actually lift their tariffs?
Bottom line

ABC News never printed Trump's offer that Canadian companies moving to the United States would pay no tariffs, which Breitbart treated as the news.

The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Trump posted that Canadian companies doing business with America should move to the United States immediately and face no tariffs official statementin Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Trump said he would impose 50 percent tariffs on all cars, trucks, automotive parts, and steel from Canada starting January 1, 2027 numberin Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Trump approved a temporary lift on tariffs for 300,000 metric tons of foreign beef numberin ABC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • White House said the U.S. cattle herd is at a multi-decade low and supply is insufficient to meet demand official statementin ABC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Trump claimed Canadian tariffs on U.S. farm products had created a 60 billion dollar deficit between the two countries numberin Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Nebraska farmer Scott Thomsen, a three-time Trump voter, said he is calling it quits with the GOP over imported beef individual casein ABC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
ABC News treated the clash with Canada as part of a wider tariff-and-import agenda that it said could alienate farmers and Republican voters in competitive cattle states before the November midterms. Kansas farmer Matt Ubel, who said he voted for Trump in the last three presidential elections, asked why the United States would “keep ruffling that feather” with Canada, “historically… a pretty good neighbor,” and said the September beef-tariff pause was not “about making cheaper groceries for the American people,” arguing officials “need to invest in their farmers -- not import beef from other countries.” Nebraska farmer Scott Thomsen, identified as a three-time Trump voter, said “we’re not America First when we’re talking about importing beef” and that he was “calling it quits with the GOP,” criticizing Nebraska Republicans for “really soft” statements that did not “call out President Trump directly.” ABC News pointed to USDA cattle-sales data placing competitive races in Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, and Wisconsin, and reported that Sen. Pete Ricketts said “flooding the market with lower quality beef compromises Nebraska farmers and ranchers,” Sen. Deb Fischer said the plan “hurts our livestock industry,” and Sen. Roger Marshall wrote that what is short is “the signal to US ranchers to grow the herd back.”
The Right View
Breitbart presented the relocation invitation as a pro-U.S. offer: Canadian firms that move would face no tariffs, reversing departures Trump blamed on past “stupid U.S. Leadership.” The outlet framed the Glenn Beck remarks and the 2027 auto, parts, and steel tariffs as overdue pushback against a partner that has “taken advantage of the United States for many decades” and been “ripping off the United States of America for years” through “ridiculously high tariffs on our Farmers and farm products,” which Trump said produced a $60 billion deficit that is “Not sustainable, and NOT ANYMORE.”
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is electoral and sectoral: named Trump-voting ranchers in battleground farm states say the Canada fight, stacked with the beef-import pause, undercuts “America First” for livestock producers, and GOP senators from those states say imported beef “hurts our livestock industry” and “compromises Nebraska farmers and ranchers.” The right’s strongest argument is leverage: a claimed $60 billion farm-related deficit and Canadian tariffs on U.S. agriculture justify pairing a 2027 tariff wall with a no-tariff path for firms that relocate, reclaiming production lost under prior U.S. policy. The central unresolved tension is whether Canada is a long-running exploiter whose companies should be induced onto U.S. soil, or a close neighbor whose punishment — alongside more imported beef — damages the domestic producers the tariffs are supposed to help.

2 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.