OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Trump Donor Harold Hamm's Firm Signs Venezuela Oil Deal

4 sources · updated 2026-09-18
Left 100% Center 0% Right 0%
3 left · 0 center · 0 right

What happened

Continental Resources Inc., the privately held Oklahoma City oil producer founded by Harold Hamm, signed a memorandum of understanding with Venezuela’s state oil company, Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA), to develop and operate 126,000 acres in the Orinoco Belt. Continental said the tract holds an estimated 30 billion barrels of reserves and that it plans to convert the MOU into a long-term agreement in the coming weeks. The deal was presented in Houston at a G20 energy gathering, where U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright appeared with Hamm. Continental said it evaluated Venezuela after the Trump administration urged U.S. firms to invest and after Venezuela changed rules governing its oil industry.
Sourcing check · Partly on the record · 3 articles

1 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It started with unnamed sources; a named source appeared 23 hours later.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 1 of 3
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Chris Wright and The Wall Street Journal
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 3
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: press release
Credits another outlet 1 of 3
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: The Wall Street Journal
Unnamed sources 0 of 3
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 16, 20:07 UTC by CNBC, with no named source. First named source 23 hours later, from Mother Jones. First document 2 hours later, from The Hill (press release).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK. Only left-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days; Fox Business reported it on 2026-09-16.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication, so only left-leaning readers see that a Trump donor's firm is entering Venezuela's oil sector after the administration ousted Nicolás Maduro. Left-leaning coverage reports Continental Resources reaching a preliminary agreement with the state oil company to develop and operate a tract in the Orinoco Belt. Mother Jones and CNBC both identify founder Harold Hamm as a Trump donor, which is the political fact a reader of the silent side never encounters. Left-leaning coverage also differs on the official staging of the announcement. The Houston appearance is in Mother Jones alone, which quotes Wright calling the pact a "milestone deal." CNBC omits that appearance and stays with the corporate announcement and later donor biography. What share of production or revenue would Continental receive if the memorandum becomes a long-term contract?
Bottom line

Right-leaning outlets have not reported Harold Hamm's Venezuela oil deal, which CNBC puts at an estimated 30 billion barrels.

The receipts — 3 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Harold Hamm donated more than $1 million to the Make America Great Again PAC from 2023 to 2024 numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Harold Hamm personally contributed $4.3 million to Trump-aligned PACs for the 2024 campaign numberin Mother Jones · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • NABEP granted the U.S. government a 35% ownership stake along with a guaranteed crude supply numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Bloomberg, CNBC, The Hill, and Mother Jones report the MOU’s terms—Orinoco Belt acreage, 30 billion barrels, a forthcoming long-term PDVSA contract—and frame it as a Trump-aligned business story. They identify Hamm as a Trump donor and adviser; CNBC cites OpenSecrets for more than $1 million to the Make America Great Again PAC in 2023–2024, while Mother Jones reports $4.3 million to Trump-aligned PACs. Coverage places the announcement after the administration’s removal of Nicolás Maduro, Trump’s call for U.S. companies to develop Venezuelan reserves, and oil-law changes under acting President Delcy Rodríguez. Outlets say publicly traded majors have been hesitant, while also reporting Chevron’s planned $7 billion expansion, a possible ExxonMobil deal, and a separate North American Blue Energy Partners concession that they say gave Washington a 35% stake and claims of control over more than 65 billion barrels. Mother Jones quotes Wright calling Continental’s pact a milestone and cites Brown University’s Jeff Colgan saying the benefits will go to companies, not U.S. consumers or ordinary Venezuelans.
Our Take (balanced)
The core story is substantive: a named operator, a stated MOU with PDVSA, specific acreage and reserve figures, a company statement, and an on-the-record comment from the energy secretary. Established facts are the announced MOU and Hamm’s record as a Trump contributor. Not yet established is a binding long-term contract; donation totals also conflict across outlets. Surrounding claims in the same coverage—U.S. majority control of tens of billions of barrels, the NABEP concession, and the precise political-military timeline in Caracas—are reported as related developments without primary documents in these pieces. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for the promised PDVSA long-term agreement, any contract text or maps, Venezuelan government confirmation, and on-the-record responses from Continental, the Energy Department, and other operators.

4 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.