OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Trump AI Pledge Letter Misspells United States Twice

3 sources · updated 2026-09-30
Left 33% Center 33% Right 33%
1 left · 1 center · 1 right

What happened

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump met at the White House with AI executives including Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, Nvidia’s Jensen Huang, and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei and announced a signed voluntary pledge titled the “Joint Commitment on Frontier Responsibilities,” from a “White House Accord on Super Intelligence.” The pledge called on companies that train and deploy frontier models to add safety controls, an independent oversight board, and internal checks so their systems “behave as intended,” with no legal or regulatory penalties if a signee breaks it. Trump posted a photo of the signed document on Truth Social and the White House posted it on X; beneath his signature the text read “Unites States” rather than “United States,” while other signatories’ names were spelled correctly. The same misspelling appeared in both posts. An executive order issued in connection with the gathering directed federal departments and agencies to replace the phrase “artificial intelligence” with “superintelligence” or “SI.”
Sourcing check · Partly on the record · 3 articles

1 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 1 of 3
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: President Donald Trump and Mark Zuckerberg
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 3
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: on-record letter, social media posts, Joint Commitment on Frontier Responsibilities
Credits another outlet 0 of 3
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 3
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 30, 14:50 UTC by TechCrunch, naming its source. First document within the hour, from The Hill (on-record letter).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning coverage reports the country's name misspelled twice on official channels, while left-leaning coverage reports only Trump's own post. Right-leaning coverage in the Washington Examiner says both Trump and the White House shared images of the memo on social media. Left-leaning coverage in The Hill describes only the letter Trump posted on Truth Social and never mentions a White House account repeating that same misspelled image. Left-leaning coverage calls the document a “letter.” Right-leaning coverage calls it a “memorandum.” The first sits beside a personal social post. The second sits beside White House promotion of the accord. Has the White House yet posted a corrected image of the signed pledge, or does the line under the signature still read Unites States?
Bottom line

The Hill gave readers one Trump letter with a mangled title. The Washington Examiner gave them the White House posting the same error twice.

The receipts — 4 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • United States was misspelled twice in images of the memo posted by both Trump and the White House numberin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • The misspelled memo was posted on Tuesday evening and on Wednesday morning contextin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • The misspelled images appeared on X as well as Truth Social contextin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • The letter outlined a voluntary agreement to implement certain guardrails contextin The Hill · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
The Hill frames the episode around the letter Trump posted after the meeting, highlighting a typo that rendered his title “President of the Unites States.” It describes that letter as detailing a “pact” with key AI leaders for a voluntary agreement to implement “certain guardrails” following “several high-profile cybersecurity incidents where AI chatbots escaped.”
The Right View
The Washington Examiner frames the error as an administration promotional lapse, stating that the Trump administration “misspelled the United States twice” in images of the White House AI memo. It notes that both Trump and the White House posted the “Joint Commitment on Frontier Responsibilities” on X and Truth Social with “Unites States” under the signature.
Our Take (balanced)
Left-leaning coverage’s strongest argument is that the misspelling sat in the president’s title on a document he himself posted, which The Hill treats as the lead fact after a meeting billed as producing AI “guardrails.” Right-leaning coverage’s strongest argument is that the identical error ran in both the president’s and the White House’s posts, which the Examiner cites as the administration misspelling the country’s name twice while promoting the memo. The central unresolved tension is whether that error indicates haste or inattention in a high-profile AI accord, or is a minor clerical mistake irrelevant to the pledge itself.

3 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.