OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

US Approves Potential $24B F-35 Sale to Saudi Arabia

4 sources · updated 2026-09-20
Left 100% Center 0% Right 0%
4 left · 0 center · 0 right

What happened

The U.S. State Department announced Thursday that it approved a potential $24.3 billion sale of F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia. The proposed package includes 48 Lockheed Martin F-35 aircraft, 49 Pratt & Whitney engines, and related equipment. Congress has 30 days to review or attempt to block the deal. The State Department said the sale would support U.S. foreign policy and national security by improving the security of a major non-NATO ally and would not alter the military balance in the Middle East.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 4 articles

2 of 4 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 2 of 4
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: State Department and Raja Krishnamoorthi
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 4
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: official announcement
Credits another outlet 0 of 4
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 1 of 4
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 18, 00:05 UTC by The Hill, naming its source. First document 8 hours later, from CNBC (official announcement).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
BLINDSPOT. Only left-leaning outlets are covering this story — the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

A reader of right-leaning outlets would miss that Washington has approved a potential F-35 sale to Saudi Arabia. Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication. Left-leaning coverage reports the Trump administration advanced the deal, with CNBC putting the package at $24.3 billion. The same coverage, via the New York Times, says intelligence agencies warned China could steal U.S. warplane technology if the jets go to Riyadh. Among those outlets, CNBC also links the announcement to Houthi attacks and a ground offensive toward a vital oil strait. Left-leaning coverage splits on what to put first. CNBC frames the sale against Houthi attacks. It quotes the State Department saying the sale would "not alter the military balance in the region." The New York Times instead opens on the intelligence warning about China. What safeguards would keep F-35 secrets out of Chinese hands after the jets arrive in Riyadh?
Bottom line

CNBC says Congress has 30 days to block the F-35 package for Saudi Arabia. Right-leaning outlets had not reported that sale at all.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • The State Department approved a potential $24.3 billion F-35 sale to Saudi Arabia numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The package includes 48 F-35 jets numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Congress has 30 days to scrutinize or attempt to block the deal numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi said the intelligence community is warning the sale could put American military technology within reach of the Chinese Communist Party official statementin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The approval came despite worries from defense officials and lawmakers contextin The Hill · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets report that the Trump administration advanced a $24.3 billion F-35 package to Saudi Arabia despite U.S. intelligence warnings that China could acquire or steal the aircraft’s technology if the jets are delivered. Coverage cites 48 F-35s and 49 engines, notes intensified Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia and a Houthi push toward the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, and highlights Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi’s objection that the deal could put advanced U.S. military technology within reach of China. Outlets also recall prior congressional scrutiny of arms sales after the 2018 killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi and point to President Trump’s close ties with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, including a prior $600 billion Saudi investment commitment and a nearly $142 billion defense sales package.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it rests on a named State Department announcement with specific dollar figures, aircraft counts, and a 30-day congressional review window, plus on-the-record comments from a named member of Congress. Established facts are the State Department’s approval of a potential $24.3 billion F-35 sale to Saudi Arabia (48 jets and related equipment) and the formal congressional clock. Intelligence warnings that China could obtain F-35 technology via Saudi Arabia are reported as internal assessments cited by outlets and lawmakers; the underlying reports are not publicly released in this coverage. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch next for the official congressional notification, any resolution of disapproval, public confirmation or denial of the intelligence assessments, and responses from the Pentagon, Lockheed Martin, and the Saudi government.

4 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.