OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Troy Jackson Challenges Susan Collins in Maine Senate Race

2 sources · updated 2026-09-21
Left 50% Center 0% Right 50%
1 left · 0 center · 1 right

What happened

Troy Jackson, who served as president of the Maine Senate from 2018 through 2024, entered the Democratic race for Maine's U.S. Senate seat against Republican incumbent Susan Collins. He became a leading candidate after Graham Platner, an oyster farmer, ended his campaign following a rape accusation that Platner denied. During Jackson's earlier gubernatorial bid, which ended in a third-place Democratic primary finish, the Maine chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America endorsed him and he publicized that backing on social media in May; Jackson had also led Sen. Bernie Sanders's 2016 presidential campaign in Maine, Sanders later endorsed him for Senate, and political streamer Hasan Piker publicly urged Democrats to support him. Jackson has said he does not consider himself a socialist and answered "No" when asked if he backs the national DSA platform, saying he supports "a government that works for everyday people." The latest RealClearPolitics polling aggregate showed Jackson leading Collins by 1.8 percentage points.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 2 articles

1 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It started with unnamed sources; a named source appeared 12 hours later.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 1 of 2
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Troy Jackson and Hasan Piker
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 2
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 2
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 1 of 2
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this. Here: e.g. “Democrats”, “advisers”
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 20, 15:51 UTC by New York Times, with no named source. First named source 12 hours later, from New York Post.
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage never reports Jackson's Maine DSA endorsement or Hasan Piker's support, so the Senate bid appears only as a progressive attempt to unseat Susan Collins. Right-leaning coverage is simply more complete, treating those associations as the story after he once promoted the state chapter's backing during his governor run. It quotes him saying, "I don't really consider myself anything." A reader of only the left account would miss that he is now answering for those ties on television. Left-leaning coverage calls him a "Progressive Brawler." Right-leaning coverage writes of "ties to the far left." The first phrase places him inside the party as a fighter. The second places him with socialists he is now trying to shake. What in Jackson's years leading the Maine Senate supports or contradicts the socialist label he now refuses?
Bottom line

The New York Times never mentions the Maine DSA in its account of Jackson's Senate bid, even though the New York Post reports he promoted that group's endorsement during his run for governor.

The receipts — 3 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Jackson emerged as the replacement after Graham Platner dropped his bid following a rape accusation he denied individual casein New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Jackson holds a 1.8 percentage-point edge over Susan Collins in the RealClearPolitics aggregate numberin New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Jackson said he does not back the national DSA platform official statementin New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
The New York Times frames Jackson as a "Progressive Brawler" who "landed in the race unexpectedly," and presents Democrats as hoping he can unseat Collins in "their bid to retake the Senate." That coverage treats the contest as a high-stakes pickup opportunity built around Jackson's combative progressive identity rather than around disputes over socialist labels or outside endorsers.
The Right View
The New York Post frames Jackson as "seeking to downplay his ties to the far left" and "rejecting the socialist moniker" despite prior Maine DSA backing and Piker's support. It quotes Piker calling Jackson "him" as Platner's replacement, labels Piker a "radical streamer" and "political hot potato"—citing Piker's 2019 remark that "America deserved 9/11," which Piker later said he regretted—and presents Jackson's comments that he does not "really consider myself anything" and "actually didn’t know a lot about" Piker as distancing. The Post also notes that the national DSA platform calls for abolishing the executive branch and the Senate, that Jackson's allies point out Maine DSA has not endorsed in this Senate race, and that Collins has "a history of massively overperforming polling expectations."
Our Take (balanced)
The left's strongest argument is that Jackson is a seasoned progressive legislator who unexpectedly became Democrats' most plausible vehicle to defeat Collins and help retake the Senate, a claim that rests on his years leading the Maine Senate and a narrow polling advantage. The right's strongest argument is that Jackson previously welcomed far-left support—advertising the Maine DSA gubernatorial endorsement and receiving Piker's public blessing—and is now minimizing those ties, a claim that rests on his May posts, Piker's "troy jackson is him!" appeal, and Jackson's later insistence that he did not know much about Piker. The central unresolved tension is whether Jackson's politics should be judged by those past associations or by his current refusal of the socialist label and of the national DSA platform.

2 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.