OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Treasury Yields Rise to 19 Year High in Volatile Week

15 sources · updated 2026-09-26
Left 100% Center 0% Right 0%
4 left · 0 center · 0 right

What happened

On Wednesday and Thursday, U.S. Treasury yields rose to multi-decade highs after stronger-than-expected September purchasing managers’ surveys, a weak $70 billion five-year note auction, elevated oil prices, and comments from Federal Reserve officials that further rate increases may be needed. The 10-year yield traded as high as about 5.15%–5.18%, its highest since 2007, and the 30-year yield reached as high as about 5.44%–5.47%, a level not seen since 2004. Japan’s 10-year government bond yield rose 8 basis points to 3.055%, its highest since August 1996; German Bunds and U.K. gilts also sold off. The average 30-year fixed mortgage rate moved above 7%. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s department conducted a buyback of longer-dated Treasurys on Thursday as the yen remained weak.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 13 articles

9 of 12 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 9 of 12
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Peter Boockvar, S&P Global, Mike Sanders, Michael Barr, John Williams and Bank of America
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 8 of 12
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: market data, report, news report, CME Group's FedWatch tool
Credits another outlet 0 of 12
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 1 of 12
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 24, 10:41 UTC by Axios, naming its source. First document in the first report, from Axios (market data).
Not counted 1
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK. Only left-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days; New York Post reported it on 2026-09-15.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage reports that the 10-year Treasury yield hit a 19-year high after a hot business survey and a rebound in oil. Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication. CNBC flags a weakly bid note auction as a driver, while only NBC News reports that an earlier Treasury buyback was followed by still-higher yields. A reader of the silent side is missing the global bond selloff and the fact that official buying has not reversed it. The lead is not shared. NBC News puts oil and Bessent's line that he is "the house now" up front, while CNBC leads with the PMI print. Who is demanding the extra yield — inflation-wary holders, or buyers walking away from Treasury supply?
Bottom line

The 10-year Treasury's 19-year high is so far a story only on the left, and NBC News is the outlet reporting that Bessent's first buyback was followed by higher yields.

The receipts — 2 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Weak demand at a $70 billion 5-year Treasury auction numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The Treasury is set to buy back up to $6 billion of 20- to 30-year bonds numberin NBC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
CNBC and NBC News, with additional factual context from Axios and CBS News, report a global government-bond selloff driven by hot U.S. PMI data (services 58.7, manufacturing 56.7), input-cost inflation, oil near $107 a barrel, and hawkish remarks from Fed officials Michael Barr, John Williams, and Anna Paulson. They tie the move to Iran-war energy prices, diesel and gasoline spikes, weak auction demand, and rising odds of October and December Fed hikes. Coverage highlights Bessent’s yen support and Treasury buybacks, which have not lowered long-term yields, and quotes critics saying “the house does not always win.” CNBC also airs a historical “something always breaks” frame around rapid yield spikes, citing regional banks, private credit, and AI-related debt as possible stress points. Mortgage rates above 7% and stock-market pressure are presented as Main Street effects.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it rests on checkable market prints, named auctions, published PMI figures, and on-the-record comments from named Fed and Treasury officials, not a single uncorroborated leak. Established facts include the multi-decade yield highs, the September PMI surprise, the five-year auction’s weak demand, oil’s move above $100, and Fed officials signaling possible further tightening. Less settled in the same reporting are the exact diesel price (one NBC version was corrected), the durability of any Iran-talks headline, and whether Bessent’s buybacks will change the path of long rates. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch next: Thursday’s jobless claims and new-home-sales data, the market reaction to the latest long-bond buyback, upcoming inflation prints, and whether the Fed’s October meeting confirms the hike odds now priced in futures.

15 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.