Tillis Calls Hegseth Confirmation Vote His Biggest Regret
Left 67%
Center 0%
Right 33%
2 left · 0 center · 1 right
What happened
Sen. Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican in his final months in the Senate, wrote in his memoir How to Lose Friends and Antagonize Presidents that his vote to confirm Pete Hegseth as defense secretary was the "biggest regret of my career." The book, released Tuesday, describes Tillis's early reservations about President Donald Trump's Cabinet and names Hegseth as well as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard as nominees he wished he had opposed. Tillis also wrote that he had been skeptical of allegations about Hegseth's treatment of women.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 3 articles
3 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 3 of 3
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Thom Tillis and Sen. Thom Tillis
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 3
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: book
- Credits another outlet 0 of 3
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 3
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 5, 23:13 UTC by Washington Examiner, naming its source. First document in the first report, from Washington Examiner (book).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Readers of left-leaning coverage never learn that Tillis's memoir treats the Hegseth vote as one of several Cabinet confirmations he now wishes he had blocked. Right-leaning coverage reports he also named Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard as nominees he wished he opposed, recasting a Hegseth-only regret as a wider recantation of Trump's Cabinet. The Hill never mentions those names, so the regret reads as Hegseth-specific rather than a pattern.
The two sides do not even use the same title for the man whose confirmation Tillis now calls his biggest regret. Left-leaning coverage calls him "Defense Secretary". Right-leaning coverage calls him "War Secretary".
Why did the Hegseth confirmation, among the Cabinet votes he now second-guesses, become the biggest regret of his career?
Bottom line
If you read only The Hill, Tillis's book looks like a Hegseth recantation. Kennedy and Gabbard show up only in the Washington Examiner.
The receipts — 2 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Tillis named Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard as nominees he wished he opposed
- Tillis described early reservations about President Donald Trump's Cabinet
The Left View
The Hill frames the memoir as a Republican senator declaring the Hegseth confirmation his career's greatest mistake, and it foregrounds that he had been "skeptical of allegations made about Hegseth's treatment of women." The coverage treats that vote, not the other Cabinet names, as the news.
The Right View
The Washington Examiner presents the line as an introspective note from a departing senator writing on "Trump 2.0," grouping the Hegseth vote with Tillis's wish that he had also opposed Kennedy and Gabbard rather than isolating it as a Hegseth-only verdict. It refers to Hegseth as "War Secretary."
Our Take (balanced)
Left-leaning coverage's strongest argument is Tillis's own superlative—"biggest regret of my career"—applied specifically to confirming Hegseth, which The Hill pairs with his earlier skepticism of allegations about Hegseth's treatment of women. Right-leaning coverage's strongest argument is the memoir's wider cast: Tillis lists Hegseth with Kennedy and Gabbard as picks he wished he had blocked, which the Examiner reads as late second thoughts about Trump's second-term Cabinet rather than a Hegseth-specific recantation. The central unresolved tension is whether the quote is a targeted judgment on Hegseth or one item in a broader recantation of those personnel choices.
2 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.