OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Thune Worries Republicans Could Lose Senate Majority

2 sources · updated 2026-09-04
Left 50% Center 0% Right 50%
1 left · 0 center · 1 right

What happened

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said in a Tuesday interview with South Dakota outlet Keloland News that he worries Republicans could lose their Senate majority in this fall’s midterms. “I worry about that, for sure,” Thune said. “I’m a realist, and I just think you — I don’t ever try and sugarcoat things. I think it’s a competitive environment right now.” Republicans can lose three seats in November and still keep the majority; nonpartisan forecasters rate five GOP-held seats as toss-ups, and a sixth GOP-held seat in North Carolina has shifted toward Democrats. On Fox News the same day, Thune said Texas is “such an expensive state” that Republicans will need President Donald Trump “to be engaged there and to be putting resources into that race,” where Ken Paxton — who, with Trump’s backing, ousted Sen. John Cornyn in the primary — is polling tied with or behind Democratic state Rep. James Talarico.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage withholds the map that makes Thune's warning measurable, naming only high prices and a slumping presidential approval rating and offering no count of vulnerable seats. Right-leaning coverage reports that Republicans can lose three seats and still keep the Senate. The same account rates five GOP-held seats as toss-ups, which turns the warning from a feeling into a count of losses the majority can absorb before control flips. Left-leaning coverage leads with high prices as the political problem facing the majority this fall, ahead of any discussion of specific races. Right-leaning coverage never mentions prices and instead opens on a competitive environment despite "high-quality candidates," then points to Trump's polling and voter angst over the war in Iran. Which cause did Thune actually name in the Keloland interview: high prices, the war in Iran, or only a competitive environment?
Bottom line

The Hill covered Thune's Senate warning without the three-seat cushion; only the Washington Examiner told readers how many losses the majority can take.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Senate Republicans can lose three seats in November and keep their majority numberin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • A sixth GOP-held Senate seat, in North Carolina, has shifted in Democrats' favor contextin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Thune said Republicans will need the president and his team putting resources into the Texas Senate race official statementin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Trump-backed Ken Paxton ousted Sen. John Cornyn, a four-term incumbent supported by Thune contextin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Thune estimated that 25 or 30 GOP senators want the 60-vote filibuster threshold left untouched numberin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
The Hill frames Thune’s comments as an admission that Republicans face “strong political headwinds” this fall, tying the majority leader’s worry to high prices and President Trump’s slumping approval rating. The coverage presents a top Republican conceding electoral danger rooted in the economy and the president’s standing, rather than treating the remarks as routine midterm caution.
The Right View
The Washington Examiner sets the same caution against a map that “marginally favors Senate Republicans” and a roster of “high-quality candidates,” while noting Democrats could still take the chamber “on a good election night.” It attributes the warning to traditional midterm headwinds for the party in power, Trump’s approval ratings “flirting with new lows,” and “voter angst over the war in Iran,” and it links Thune’s tone to repeated disagreements with Trump over campaign strategy — especially the need for presidential money in Texas after Paxton’s primary. The Examiner also reports Republicans as bullish on flipping Michigan after Democrats nominated progressive Abdul el Sayed, and as contesting Democratic seats in Georgia and New Hampshire.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that a sitting majority leader’s refusal to sugarcoat the race is itself evidence of real national vulnerability, with The Hill pointing to high prices and Trump’s slumping approval as the headwinds behind the warning. The right’s strongest argument, grounded in the Examiner’s seat math, is that Republicans can lose three seats and keep control, still field competitive candidates, and contest Democratic-held seats in Michigan, Georgia, and New Hampshire — so “competitive” need not mean likely loss. The central unresolved tension is whether those national headwinds, plus uneven Trump campaign engagement in costly races such as Texas, are large enough to overwhelm a map that still only marginally favors Republicans.

2 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.