Polls Show Tight Maine Senate Race Between Collins and Jackson
Left 50%
Center 0%
Right 50%
1 left · 0 center · 1 right
What happened
A poll released Wednesday by co/efficient found Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine leading Democrat Troy Jackson 48 percent to 46 percent, with 6 percent of voters undecided, in the state's U.S. Senate race. Collins, first elected in 1996, is seeking a sixth term. Jackson, a former Maine Senate president, became the Democratic nominee after Graham Platner, who had won the Democratic primary, withdrew. Collins was viewed favorably by 44 percent of voters and unfavorably by 47 percent; Jackson was viewed favorably by 36 percent and unfavorably by 47 percent, with about one in six voters yet to form a view of him. A recent New York Times/Siena poll of the same race found Collins ahead 49 percent to 46 percent.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 2 articles
1 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 1 of 2
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: co/efficient
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 2
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: poll results
- Credits another outlet 0 of 2
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 2
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 30, 21:51 UTC by Breitbart, naming its source. First document in the first report, from Breitbart (poll results).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage never reports that Susan Collins is ahead in Maine, so a reader would not know the Senate race is still Republican-led. Slate's own notes treat midterms as a moment of Democratic optimism and call once-safe Republican seats "up for grabs," without naming Collins, Troy Jackson, or any Maine poll. Right-leaning coverage is simply more complete on the contest and leads with a co/efficient survey that has Collins in front.
The two sides do not lead with the same story. Right-leaning coverage opens on Collins still holding the edge over Jackson. Left-leaning coverage opens on the opposition getting "a little optimism, as a treat," and never gets to a named Senate seat.
Does Collins's edge exceed the poll's margin of error?
Bottom line
Slate never names Collins or the Maine race at all. Breitbart has her leading at 48 percent.
The receipts — 3 facts one side's coverage lacks
- About 1 in 6 Maine voters have yet to form a view of Jackson
- Jackson was selected by party insiders after Graham Platner withdrew, having won the Democratic primary
- Collins is viewed favorably by 44 percent of voters and unfavorably by 47 percent
The Left View
Slate did not dwell on the Maine numbers themselves, instead casting close midterm contests as "a hit of Democratic hopium." It argued that although the party holding the White House typically braces for backlash, Donald Trump's approval rating hitting "historic lows" and voters "furious at his handling of the economy, inflation, and the war in Iran" have put races "once considered safe Republican wins" up for grabs. The podcast presented that opening as a chance for the opposition to "have a little optimism, as a treat," featuring political scientist David Faris.
The Right View
Breitbart framed the result as Collins continuing to lead, calling Jackson a "far-left Democrat" whom "party insiders selected" after Platner's withdrawal. It stressed that Collins "is more well defined than Jackson," whose favorability lagged hers, and quoted co/efficient's summary that "Collins is known to nearly everyone; about 1 in 6 voters have yet to form a view of Jackson." The outlet also noted that the New York Times/Siena survey likewise showed her ahead.
Our Take (balanced)
The left's strongest argument is that historically low presidential approval and voter anger over the economy, inflation, and Iran have made previously safe Republican seats contestable, so a narrow Collins lead is itself a sign the map has opened. The right's strongest argument is that two separate polls still show the incumbent ahead of a late-entering, less-defined opponent whose unfavorables match hers while his favorables do not, indicating Collins's personal standing still outweighs the national climate in Maine. The central unresolved tension is whether a two-point lead for a well-known incumbent is evidence of a Democratic opening or of Collins retaining a durable, race-specific advantage.
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.