OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

S&P 500 Hits Record High on AI Rally

8 sources · updated 2026-10-07
Left 100% Center 0% Right 0%
3 left · 0 center · 0 right

What happened

On Tuesday, the S&P 500 closed at a record high, finishing above 7,800 for the first time and surpassing its previous peak from August 13. The Nasdaq Composite also set a record high, and the Russell 2000 rose in early trading. Technology stocks led the advance, including Nvidia, which moved closer to a $6 trillion market capitalization, along with Marvell Technology, Broadcom, Microsoft, Amazon and Tesla. Oil prices fell, with Brent crude dropping more than 2 percent to below $99 a barrel and U.S. crude falling about 1.5 percent to under $88, after a report that a key Saudi pipeline was operating normally. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield eased slightly after reaching its highest level since 2002 the previous day.
Sourcing check · Rests on documents, no one quoted · 3 articles

No article quotes anyone; the reporting rests on market data. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 0 of 2
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: No article does.
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 2
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: market data
Credits another outlet 0 of 2
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 2
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 6, 20:28 UTC by The Guardian, naming its source. First document in the first report, from The Guardian (market data).
Not counted 1
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
BLINDSPOT. Only left-leaning outlets are covering this story — the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning coverage had not reported this record as of publication. Left-leaning coverage says the S&P 500 and Nasdaq set new highs on an AI-chip rally, with the S&P finishing above 7,800 for the first time. The covering outlets do not equally spell out how concentrated that high is. Daily moves are now dictated by a small handful of names, a point CNBC ties to mega-cap tech holding more than 34 percent of the index. A reader of the silent side misses the record and that concentration. Left-leaning coverage also parts on what belongs beside the high. Nvidia's path toward a $6 trillion market value opens the NBC News story. Consumer fuel still above last year leads the Guardian story, which also carries Trump saying "our nation is doing better now than it's ever done." Would the S&P 500 still be at a record if the AI names were stripped out?
Bottom line

CNBC says a handful of AI-era names now hold more than 34 percent of the S&P 500 that just set a record. Right-leaning outlets had not covered the high.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • The S&P 500 closed above 7,800 for the first time numberin The Guardian, CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The Magnificent 7 make up more than 34% of the S&P 500's market cap numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The S&P 500 touched an all-time intraday high of 7844.52 numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • AI infrastructure stocks are expected to drive more than half of S&P 500 EPS growth in Q3 numberin NBC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Nvidia and Micron would likely be responsible for a third of the S&P 500's earnings growth this quarter numberin NBC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
NBC News, The Guardian, CNBC and Bloomberg reported that the S&P 500 and Nasdaq reached record highs on a fourth straight up day for the S&P, driven overwhelmingly by technology and AI-related stocks. They cited optimism heading into third-quarter earnings, with Goldman Sachs analysts saying AI infrastructure names could account for more than half of S&P 500 EPS growth and Nvidia and Micron a third of that growth. Coverage contrasted the equity rally with still-elevated oil and consumer energy prices, Treasury yields near multi-decade highs, and mixed economic signals after a mid-September Fed rate increase. Outlets noted the rally’s narrow leadership, including that the Magnificent 7 make up more than 34 percent of S&P 500 market cap, and relayed comments from President Trump that oil prices could fall after the midterm elections if a deal with Iran is reached.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it is built on checkable market data—index levels, named stocks, oil prices, and Treasury yields—plus on-the-record comments from named analysts at FactSet, Goldman Sachs, Apollo and others. Established facts are the record closes, the tech-led session, and that energy prices and bond yields remained historically high. Pipeline-status claims after attacks and a possible post-midterm Iran deal affecting oil are reported secondhand and are not independently documented in these articles. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch next for bank earnings next week, Wednesday’s Federal Reserve meeting minutes, and official confirmation on energy supply and any diplomatic developments.

8 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.