Democrats Condemn Journalist for Calling Hakeem Jeffries AIPAC Monkey
Left 0%
Center 0%
Right 100%
0 left · 0 center · 4 right
What happened
On Wednesday, journalist Rula Jebreal appeared on Wajahat Ali’s podcast “The Left Hook” and called House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., a “bought and paid by AIPAC monkey” and an “errand boy,” while criticizing his support for Israel. Jebreal said she did not mean the remark “in a racist way” and later said she was referring to the “three monkeys” proverb. The Congressional Black Caucus and Democratic members including Reps. Ritchie Torres, Joe Neguse, and Ayanna Pressley publicly condemned the comments as racist. Jebreal later posted an apology on X, calling the term inappropriate and offensive while repeating her criticism of Jeffries over AIPAC funding.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 4 articles
4 of 4 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report. Congressional Black Caucus denied part of it on the record.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 4 of 4
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Rula Jebreal, Congressional Black Caucus, Rep. Joe Neguse, Vernon Jones and Breitbart News
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 4
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
- Credits another outlet 0 of 4
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 4
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- On-record denial 4
- A named person or institution says the claim, or part of it, is not true. It is on the record — someone signed their name to it — but it is not confirmation, so it never counts toward On the record. Criticizing or dissenting from a decision is not a denial. The count is how many people or institutions deny it; each is listed with the first article that carried the denial. Here: Congressional Black Caucus (Breitbart, Sep 5, 19:28 UTC); Ritchie Torres (Breitbart, Sep 5, 19:28 UTC); Congressional Black Caucus (Washington Examiner, Sep 5, 21:22 UTC); Ritchie Torres (Washington Examiner, Sep 5, 21:22 UTC)
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 5, 18:25 UTC by Fox News, naming its source.
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
BLINDSPOT.
Only right-leaning outlets are covering this story
— the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage has not reported the story. Right-leaning coverage says Democratic officials including the Congressional Black Caucus condemned journalist Rula Jebreal after she called Hakeem Jeffries an "AIPAC monkey" on Wajahat Ali's podcast and then described him as an errand boy. Jebreal denied racial intent and later invoked the hear-no-evil monkeys. The caucus said there is no non-racist way to use those terms about a Black man. She later apologized unconditionally while restating that Jeffries takes AIPAC money. A reader of left-leaning coverage would not know Democratic lawmakers had denounced the remark as racist.
Right-leaning coverage splits on the follow-up insult. The errand-boy line was "dangerously close to the definition of a slave" in Breitbart. Fox News reported the phrase without that comparison.
Did Jeffries take AIPAC money, the charge Jebreal led with in her rant and her apology?
Bottom line
Jebreal called Hakeem Jeffries an "AIPAC monkey," then apologized while repeating the AIPAC charge; Fox News carried the Democratic backlash, and left-leaning coverage has not.
The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
- The Congressional Black Caucus said there is not a non-racist way to call Leader Jeffries, a Black man, a monkey or errand boy.
- Jebreal posted that she was disgusted Jeffries is taking money from AIPAC amidst Israel's genocide in Palestine, then apologized unconditionally.
- Axia Public Relations CEO Jason Mudd said Jebreal reasserts the accusation first and tucks the apology at the end.
- Rep. Ayanna Pressley condemned Jebreal's comments.
- Jebreal left MSNBC in 2014 after calling the news media and U.S. government biased in its support of Israel.
The Right View
Fox News, Breitbart, and the Washington Examiner reported that Jebreal, described as an anti-Israel or Palestinian journalist and former MSNBC commentator, used the phrases “AIPAC monkey” and “errand boy” about Jeffries, a Black Democrat. They reported Ali noting on air that “monkey” has racial connotations, Jebreal’s three-monkeys clarification, the CBC’s statement that there is no non-racist way to use those terms about Jeffries, and condemnations from Torres, Neguse, and Pressley. Coverage highlighted Torres’s remark that the left would have condemned the same language from the far right, Jebreal’s X apology that led with criticism of Jeffries, and a PR executive’s view that the apology was insufficient.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: the remarks were made on a recorded podcast, named Democratic officials and the Congressional Black Caucus issued public statements, and Jebreal posted a public apology. Established facts are the words used, the CBC and lawmaker condemnations, and the apology text. Jebreal’s intent and whether her three-monkeys explanation is credible remain her claims, not independent findings. No left-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for any comment from Jeffries, further statements from party leadership, or additional professional consequences.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.