Record El Nino Could Intensify California Winter Storms
Left 100%
Center 0%
Right 0%
3 left · 0 center · 0 right
What happened
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration reported that sea-surface temperatures in the tropical Pacific region used to measure El Niño were 6.1 degrees Fahrenheit above normal this fall, the second-largest July–September anomaly on record. NOAA said there was a 90 percent chance of a very strong El Niño this fall and winter and a 75 percent chance it would exceed any event since 1950. El Niño is a recurring Pacific pattern in which equatorial winds weaken and cold-water upwelling slows, typically raising global temperatures and shifting the jet stream south. UNICEF said more than 347 million children live in areas expected to see wetter or drier conditions from the pattern. Scientists also cited expected U.S. West Coast storminess and beach erosion, a quieter Atlantic hurricane season, Pacific storms affecting Hawaii, and unusual marine species appearing farther north off California.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 3 articles
2 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It started with unnamed sources; a named source appeared 12 hours later.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 3
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency, UNICEF, Abby Frazier and University of Chicago’s Climate Impacts Lab
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 3
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: official statistics
- Credits another outlet 0 of 3
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 3
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 6, 09:00 UTC by Washington Post, with no named source. First named source 12 hours later, from NBC News. First document 12 hours later, from NBC News (official statistics).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
BLINDSPOT.
Only left-leaning outlets are covering this story
— the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
The only published version of this story is left-leaning, and it is not even one story. Global child-welfare and heat-death estimates appear in NBC News and never in the Washington Post. Left-leaning coverage agrees that tropical Pacific warmth has hit a record and that NOAA sees a very strong winter El Niño, with floods, droughts, California beach erosion, and crop shocks. Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication. A reader of that side misses the record anomaly, the agency outlook, and the harm estimates entirely.
The lead language diverges sharply, with NBC News opening on "Godzilla" and the Washington Post opening on California winter storms and coastal erosion.
How much of the flooding, drought, and heat deaths now being projected would still be expected if this were an ordinary El Niño rather than a record one?
Bottom line
A right-leaning reader would not know this El Niño is being covered at all, let alone that NBC News cites a 451,000 excess-heat-death estimate.
The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures are 6.1 degrees Fahrenheit higher than normal in the region used to measure El Niño
- NOAA said there was a 90% chance of a very strong El Niño this fall and winter
- The University of Chicago Climate Impacts Lab estimates 451,000 excess-heat deaths worldwide from El Niño raising global average temperatures
- UNICEF said over 347 million children live in areas expected to experience drier or wetter conditions because of El Niño
- NOAA's El Niño index for July through September is the second-biggest anomaly on record even when global warming is not factored into temperatures
The Left View
The Washington Post and NBC News, the outlets covering the story, describe a “super” or “Godzilla” El Niño with grave global consequences. They cite NOAA’s temperature records and probability statements; UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell on 347 million children facing drier or wetter conditions, water shortages, malnutrition, and disease; and a University of Chicago Climate Impacts Lab estimate of 451,000 excess-heat deaths worldwide. Coverage emphasizes California winter storms, flooding, and coastal erosion as sea levels rise in warmer water; drought versus deluge by region; jet-stream shifts; agricultural hits to rice, coffee, and chocolate and possible grocery-price effects (climatologist Abby Frazier of Clark University); a historically mellow Atlantic hurricane season versus powerful Pacific storms; NASA satellite evidence of taller equatorial seas; and northward sightings of whale sharks, sea snakes, and nesting turtles off California.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it rests on NOAA index data, named agency probability statements, and named researchers and organizations, not a single uncorroborated claim. Established are the reported Pacific temperature anomaly, NOAA’s stated odds of a very strong or historic event, and contemporaneous signs such as a quiet Atlantic hurricane season, Pacific storm activity, NASA sea-height readings, and species sightings. UNICEF’s 347 million children figure, the Climate Impacts Lab’s 451,000 excess-heat deaths estimate, grocery-price effects, and specific flood, drought, or erosion outcomes are projections, not observed results. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch NOAA’s next El Niño updates, winter precipitation and temperature outcomes versus those forecasts, and official disaster, public-health, and agricultural reports as the season unfolds.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.