OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Patrick Clancy Starts New Chapter With Wife After Tragedy

3 sources · updated 2026-09-23
Left 0% Center 67% Right 33%
0 left · 2 center · 1 right

What happened

On Jan. 24, 2023, Patrick Clancy returned to his home in Duxbury, Massachusetts, and found that his then-wife, Lindsay Clancy, had fatally strangled their three children — Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and 8-month-old Callan — and jumped from a window in a suicide attempt. Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial later ended in a hung jury. Patrick Clancy subsequently moved to New York City, met infertility specialist Rachel Danis while running in Central Park in January 2024, and married her in April. In a CBS “60 Minutes” interview after the trial, the couple said they are starting a family and intend to tell a future child about the slain siblings.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 3 articles

3 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 3 of 3
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Rachel Danis and Patrick Clancy
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 3
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 3
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 3
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 21, 00:16 UTC by NewsNation, naming its source.
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK. Only right-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days; The Guardian reported it on 2026-09-21.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

The story of Patrick Clancy's remarriage is absent from left-leaning coverage entirely. Right-leaning coverage reports that he married Rachel Danis and appeared with her on CBS after Lindsay Clancy's trial ended in a hung jury, including Danis's account that her loved ones paused when they learned she was seeing him. Readers who never see that side miss that the father has left Massachusetts for New York and that the couple say they are starting a family they want to tell about the three children who were killed. Right-leaning coverage leads with "people were worried" and holds the news that they are starting a family until later in the same account. What, if anything, did Clancy say on camera about a retrial after the hung jury?
Bottom line

The New York Post is publishing Clancy's remarriage and the CBS interview after the hung jury; a left-leaning reader would not know that new family chapter exists.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Patrick Clancy married Rachel Danis in April individual casein New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Rachel Danis is an infertility specialist contextin New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Patrick Clancy moved to New York City seeking anonymity contextin New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • The couple first met while running in Central Park in January 2024 contextin New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Clancy said his life has changed since he met Rachel in such a positive way individual casein NewsNation · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Right View
The New York Post and other right-leaning outlets have focused on the “60 Minutes” sit-down, highlighting Rachel Danis’s account that friends and family were initially “worried” when she began dating Patrick Clancy and that she answered those concerns by describing her happiness in the relationship. Coverage also reports the couple’s plans to have a child and to talk with that child about Cora, Dawson, and Callan. Center-leaning NewsNation coverage of the same interview emphasizes Clancy’s statements that his life has changed “in such a positive way” since meeting Danis and that he is ready for a new chapter as a father.
Our Take (balanced)
The core story is substantive: named people, a public criminal case with an established trial outcome, a documented “60 Minutes” interview, and a reported marriage and family plans. Independently established facts include the 2023 killings, the hung jury, Clancy’s move, and the couple’s on-camera statements. Danis’s description of loved ones’ “worried” reactions is her uncorroborated account from that interview, not independently verified by those relatives. No left-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for any further on-the-record comments from relatives, additional interviews, or court and vital records that corroborate the marriage and family plans.

3 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.