OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Patrick Clancy and Wife Speak on Lindsay Case

5 sources · updated 2026-09-20
Left 40% Center 60% Right 0%
2 left · 3 center · 0 right

What happened

Patrick Clancy and his wife, Dr. Rachel Danis, gave interviews to CBS's 60 Minutes about the January 2023 deaths of Clancy's three children — Cora, 5; Dawson, 3; and Callan, 8 months — in Massachusetts. Clancy's former wife, Lindsay Clancy, was tried for first-degree murder in those deaths; the trial ended in a mistrial after jurors deadlocked. Patrick Clancy, who found the children after discovering Lindsay injured, later married Danis, an infertility specialist he met while running in Central Park in New York. Massachusetts prosecutors have not announced whether they will retry Lindsay Clancy; a hearing is scheduled for September 29 at Plymouth Superior Court.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 5 articles

2 of 4 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report. Danis denied part of it on the record.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 2 of 4
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Patrick Clancy and Dr. Rachel Danis
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 4
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 4
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 4
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
On-record denial 1
A named person or institution says the claim, or part of it, is not true. It is on the record — someone signed their name to it — but it is not confirmation, so it never counts toward On the record. Criticizing or dissenting from a decision is not a denial. The count is how many people or institutions deny it; each is listed with the first article that carried the denial. Here: Danis (NewsNation, Sep 18, 15:24 UTC)
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 18, 11:45 UTC by CBS News, naming its source.
Not counted 1
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK. Only left-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days; Daily Wire reported it on 2026-09-16.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication. Left-leaning coverage reports that Patrick Clancy and Dr. Rachel Danis gave CBS their first public comments after Lindsay Clancy's murder trial ended in a mistrial. Danis describes him as a "selfless father." He says he still talks to their children. He has supported his former wife even after testifying for the prosecution, the Guardian reports. A reader of the silent side misses the interview and the unfinished question of a retrial. The lead itself is the tell among left-leaning outlets: BBC puts the new wife's defense of Patrick first, and the Guardian puts his claim he did "the best I could" first. Does Patrick Clancy want Massachusetts prosecutors to retry his former wife?
Bottom line

Patrick Clancy's new wife told CBS he is a "selfless father," and left-leaning coverage notes he still backs Lindsay after the mistrial. Right-leaning outlets have not run the interview.

The Left View
BBC, The Guardian, CBS News, and NewsNation report that Patrick Clancy and Danis will appear on 60 Minutes on Sunday, September 20, in their first public comments since the mistrial. Outlets quote Clancy saying he still talks to his deceased children "all the time," that he asked them for help, and that he "did the best I could with what I had at the time." Danis is quoted calling him a "selfless father and supportive partner" and saying she does not understand "how the story's been so twisted," referring to online rumors about their marriage. Coverage also notes that Clancy testified in the prosecution phase but has supported Lindsay; a civil lawsuit alleging negligence by healthcare providers; an attorney's threat of legal action over an alleged online defamation campaign; and holdout juror Michael Desronvil's statement that he believed Lindsay Clancy "knew exactly what she was doing." Framing centers on grief, postpartum psychosis as a trial issue, and social-media conspiracy theories about Patrick Clancy.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it involves named parties, a completed criminal trial that ended in a documented mistrial, a scheduled court date, and on-the-record interviews with CBS. Established facts include the January 2023 deaths of the three children, Lindsay Clancy's first-degree murder trial and mistrial, Patrick Clancy's remarriage to Danis, and prosecutors' pending decision on a retrial. Clancy's and Danis's remarks about grief, character, and online rumors are their own statements, not independently corroborated findings; Lindsay Clancy's criminal responsibility remains unresolved after the mistrial, and the civil negligence claims are alleged, not adjudicated. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for the full 60 Minutes broadcast, prosecutors' announcement on a retrial, and the September 29 Plymouth Superior Court hearing.

5 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.