OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Democrat Calls for Trump Supporters in Concentration Camps

3 sources · updated 2026-09-12
Left 0% Center 0% Right 100%
0 left · 0 center · 2 right

What happened

Shelly Headen, the Democratic nominee for North Carolina House District 62 against Republican incumbent Rep. John Blust, lost the support of state and county Democratic organizations after social media posts attributed to her were publicized. The North Carolina House Democratic Caucus said it would no longer back her campaign, and the Guilford County Democratic Party said it was withdrawing all financial, operational, and organizational support, noting that filing deadlines had passed so her name cannot be removed from the November ballot. The posts described in the reporting include a Facebook story from a visit to the Dachau concentration camp memorial stating that Trump supporters belong there, and another post suggesting an attack on U.S. soil. After a media inquiry, a spokesperson for Democrat Roy Cooper’s U.S. Senate campaign called the remarks reprehensible and said Cooper condemns political violence. Headen issued a September 3 statement about 2024 domestic-incident reports involving her husband; outlets said she had not responded to questions about the Facebook posts by press time.
Sourcing check · Partly on the record · 3 articles

1 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It started with unnamed sources; a named source appeared 18 hours later.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 1 of 3
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Roy Cooper, Guilford County Democratic Party and Shelly Headen
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 3
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 3
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 3
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 11, 02:07 UTC by Washington Examiner, with no named source. First named source 18 hours later, from Breitbart.
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
BLINDSPOT. Only right-leaning outlets are covering this story — the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

The only accounts of North Carolina Democrats dropping a House candidate over anti-Republican violence posts come from right-leaning coverage. Left-leaning coverage has not reported the story. Right-leaning coverage says the House Democratic Caucus will no longer support Shelly Headen after her social media posts came to light. The posts include a Dachau caption that the camp is "where Trump supporters belong." Readers of left-leaning outlets would not know Democrats withdrew support or what she wrote. Right-leaning outlets also diverge on what to put first. The House cutoff leads Washington Examiner, which describes the posts as violence against Republicans and does not quote them. The smiling crematorium photo leads Breitbart, which adds a second post wishing for "an attack on US soil." Did Headen apologize for the posts or deny writing them?
Bottom line

North Carolina House Democrats cut off Shelly Headen over a Dachau caption that Breitbart quotes as "where Trump supporters belong," a break left-leaning coverage has not reported even though her name stays on the ballot.

The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • The North Carolina House Democratic Caucus said it will no longer support Shelly Headen against Rep. John Blust. official statementin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Headen posted a Facebook story from Dachau stating, 'This is where Trump supporters belong.' individual casein Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • The Guilford County Democratic Party withdrew all financial, operational, and organizational support from Headen's campaign. official statementin Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Headen wrote that 'our only hope is an attack on US soil… preferably Alabama, Louisiana… where the stupid people are.' individual casein Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • A Cooper campaign spokesperson called Headen's remarks reprehensible and said Roy strongly condemns them and all forms of political violence. official statementin Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Filing deadlines have passed and ballots are legally finalized, so Headen's name cannot be removed. contextin Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Right View
Washington Examiner and Breitbart reported that North Carolina House Democrats cut ties with Headen after posts about violence against Republicans came to light. Breitbart described a Facebook story in which Headen, smiling in front of crematorium ovens at Dachau, wrote that the site is where Trump supporters belong, and a separate post saying, “I think our only hope is an attack on US soil… preferably Alabama, Louisiana… where the stupid people are.” Those outlets framed the material as Holocaust imagery and political-violence rhetoric aimed at Republicans and Trump supporters. Breitbart also cited two 2024 law-enforcement incident reports listing Headen as the suspect and her husband as the potential victim, and said her account of a single argument conflicted with those records. Coverage highlighted distancing by the House Democratic Caucus, the Guilford County Democratic Party—which called the language indefensible—and Cooper’s Senate campaign, while noting Cooper had previously called Donald Trump a threat and a dictator. Breitbart placed the episode in a wider pattern of Democratic and left-wing rhetoric.
Our Take (balanced)
The party-response portion of the story is substantive: named actors (Headen, Blust, the N.C. House Democratic Caucus, the Guilford County Democratic Party, and Cooper’s campaign) and specific, checkable actions (withdrawal of support; a written condemnation) are on the record, and Headen is a ballot-qualified candidate in a specified district. The social-media posts and 2024 incident reports, as described, are concrete claims that can be verified or falsified with archives, screenshots, and public records, but this packet does not include independently reproduced primary documents. Established: Democratic organizations publicly cut ties and Cooper’s campaign condemned the quoted language. Alleged pending primary evidence: the exact wording, context, and authenticity of each post, and the contents of the police reports. No left-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for archived copies of the Facebook posts, Headen’s response to those posts, full party statements on official channels, and any public incident reports.

3 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.