OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Michigan Credit Union CEO Fired Over AI-Generated Lake America Photo

6 sources · updated 2026-09-26
Left 20% Center 20% Right 60%
1 left · 1 center · 3 right

What happened

On September 11, Jane Smith, then CEO of Family First Credit Union in Saginaw, Michigan, posted a Facebook photo of her family at Detroit Metropolitan Airport en route to Halifax, Nova Scotia, captioned "Like our sweatshirts? Not sure Canada will. Lol lol." She had used ChatGPT to make the family's clothing appear to read "Lake America," the name President Donald Trump's August executive order directed U.S. federal agencies to use for the U.S. portion of Lake Ontario; Smith said the image was first posted privately with an AI marker and that her sister later shared it publicly without that label. After the post spread, Smith deleted it and apologized, telling a Michigan station the family had been "poking fun" at the name change rather than making a political statement; Family First said it "unequivocally disapproves and rejects" the content. The credit union later announced Smith was no longer employed "effective immediately," named chief operations officer Jason Acosta interim CEO, and apologized "for the concern, disappointment and pain this situation has caused our members and community." The board did not say whether she resigned or was fired, citing state law; Smith said her family cut the trip short after she received death threats.
Sourcing check · Partly on the record · 5 articles

2 of 5 articles cite a named source for the story. It started with unnamed sources; a named source appeared 3 hours later.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 2 of 5
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Family First Credit Union and Jane Smith
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 5
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 5
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 5
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 25, 15:58 UTC by New York Post, with no named source. First named source 3 hours later, from Daily Wire.
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage omits that Smith said she received death threats and that her family cut the Halifax trip short. Right-leaning coverage reports both. Those details run in the New York Post and the Daily Wire. Readers of only left-leaning coverage see online anger and a corporate apology, not a safety scare, though no outlet claims the credit union cited the threats as the reason she left. Right-leaning coverage scorned the company's apology in terms left-leaning coverage did not. The New York Post called it a "groveling Facebook post." CNBC described a statement posted to the company's website. Did Family First's Michigan members ask the board to remove her, or did the board act on viral pressure from outside the membership?
Bottom line

CNBC's account of Jane Smith leaving Family First never mentions the death threats the New York Post says cut her Halifax trip short.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Smith said her family had to leave the Halifax trip early because she was receiving death threats individual casein New York Post, Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • The board did not say whether Smith resigned or was fired, telling CBC News that state law bars it from discussing the circumstances of her departure official statementin Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Family First did not state whether the reaction was the reason Smith left official statementin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Smith said she will not be using AI again individual casein New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Smith said the image should never have been created or shared official statementin Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets framed the departure as fallout from a CEO post Canadians treated as disrespectful, especially because it appeared on the anniversary of the September 11 attacks as the family headed to Halifax, which had hosted thousands of diverted air passengers in 2001. They placed the joke inside Trump's contested renaming of Lake Ontario during a trade dispute with Canada, citing Prime Minister Mark Carney that the name comes from the Indigenous Wendat language and that "naming reality means calling it Lake Ontario — then, now and always," and noting the order cannot rename Canada's waters or compel international mapmakers. CNBC and the Guardian highlighted Family First's apology for "concern, disappointment and pain" and its earlier "unequivocal" rejection of the post, along with Democratic legislation to block Great Lakes renaming. The Guardian stressed that Smith said she understood why someone in Halifax would find the image "highly offensive" and regretted any post that would make someone "feel like we don't value them as human beings," yet the institution still ended her employment.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets treated the ouster as punishment for a gag about clothing that, in the Daily Wire's headline, "Never Existed." The New York Post called Family First's announcement a "groveling" apology and reported that the AI-altered image began on Smith's private Facebook account before her sister Lisa reposted it publicly without an AI disclosure. The Daily Wire called the episode "a remarkable illustration of how thoroughly national political disputes have seeped into institutions that once existed largely outside of politics," concluding she lost her job "all over a sweatshirt that never existed." Those sources emphasized that Smith said the family faced death threats, cut the Halifax trip short, and would not use AI again, and that Trump's order was itself "a political gesture" that some U.S. companies had already followed on maps.
Our Take (balanced)
The left's strongest argument is that a community credit-union CEO publicly tied her institution to a captioned image Canadians and local members read as a slight, on a date and destination with 9/11 resonance, so the board's stated duty to "uphold the trust of our members" and put the community first could include removing her. The right's strongest argument is that the sweatshirts were never worn, the first share was private and labeled as AI, Smith apologized, and she still lost her job after death threats—the Daily Wire's evidence that political fights now follow people "into workplaces." The central unresolved tension is whether that public association with a contested national joke is a genuine institutional-trust failure or whether online outrage has turned even a fictional gag about a federal lake name into a firing offense.

6 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.