OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Lindsay Clancy Trial Spotlights Postpartum Psychosis Care

4 sources · updated 2026-09-04
Left 50% Center 50% Right 0%
2 left · 2 center · 0 right

What happened

Lindsay Clancy is on trial for the killings of her three young children. Her defense says she suffered from postpartum psychosis after seeking help and being overmedicated. Prosecutors argue she planned the killings and knew they were wrong. Postpartum psychosis is estimated to affect about one in 1,000 people after childbirth, and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders about one in five to seven women. The case has prompted discussion of postpartum care, including the traditional six-week checkup and the absence of a standard appointment schedule after that visit.
BLINDSPOT. Only left-leaning outlets are covering this story — the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage recasts the Lindsay Clancy trial as a prompt for patients and doctors to rethink postpartum care, and as a test of whether criminal court can judge psychosis. Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication. Requests for advice from women with maternal mental health conditions have surged, the Times reports, and a second story calls the condition a "poor fit for the justice system." A reader of the silent side misses that reported surge in women seeking help. That reader also misses the claim that a jury should not be asked to try this condition in a criminal court. Emphasis splits in left-leaning coverage: one story leads with patients and doctors rethinking care, the other with a jury given an "impossible task." What did the jury actually decide?
Bottom line

You could follow right-leaning outlets and never learn that the New York Times is treating the Clancy killings as a postpartum-psychosis case a jury cannot fairly try.

The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Postpartum psychosis is misunderstood and a poor fit for the justice system contextin The New York Times · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Requests for advice from women with maternal mental health conditions, as well as health providers who care for them, have surged contextin The New York Times · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The prosecution argued Clancy planned the killings and knew what she was doing was wrong contextin CBS News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Postpartum psychosis is estimated to affect about one in 1,000 people after childbirth numberin CBS News, NewsNation · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Clancy's legal team says she tried to get help but was overmedicated and didn't get the care she needed individual casein CBS News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • One in three U.S. counties is considered a maternity care desert numberin CBS News · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Outlets covering the story, including The New York Times, CBS News, and NewsNation, treat the Clancy trial as a catalyst for examining postpartum mental-health care. The Times reported a surge in requests for advice from patients and providers and described postpartum psychosis as misunderstood and a poor fit for the justice system, calling the jury's task impossible. CBS News quoted advocates and doctors saying the duty is on the system: mothers are often expected to recognize symptoms they were never taught, then navigate fragmented care while sleep-deprived. Sources cited American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidance for contact within three weeks postpartum and a comprehensive visit by 12 weeks, maternity-care deserts in one in three U.S. counties, stigma around speaking ill of motherhood, and concerns about funding and specialist shortages. NewsNation reported a postpartum-psychosis survivor calling the trial heartbreaking and noted the condition is rare. Coverage juxtaposes the defense claim that Clancy tried to get help against the prosecution claim that she planned the killings.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive on the criminal proceeding: a named defendant is on trial, with competing claims about mental state that can be tested through testimony and records. Policy claims cite named advocates and clinicians, ACOG recommendations, and published prevalence and maternity-desert figures. Established facts include that the trial is under way, that the defense and prosecution dispute psychosis versus planning, and that professional guidelines already recommend earlier and ongoing postpartum contact rather than a single six-week visit. Alleged and unresolved are whether Clancy had postpartum psychosis, whether she was overmedicated or denied adequate care, and whether she planned the killings. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for the verdict, medical evidence introduced at trial, and any formal response from health agencies or professional organizations on postpartum-care standards.

4 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.