OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Federal Charges Filed Over Illegal Kratom Sales After Ole Miss Deaths

4 sources · updated 2026-10-03
Left 33% Center 67% Right 0%
1 left · 2 center · 0 right

What happened

On Sept. 21, University of Mississippi students Aidan Hamilton, 18, and Robert Strang, 20, were found dead at two separate scenes, one on campus and one off campus. Investigators recovered opened packages labeled “Smax, Pseudo-DHM” at both locations; bank records linked Hamilton to purchases at Puffs Vape Tobacco & Beer in Oxford, including one the day before he died, and Strang to Express Mart #7. On Sept. 24, according to a DEA affidavit, a confidential informant bought kratom-based pills from clerk Yahya Mohamed Mosleh, 51, who told the informant to “be quiet” about the pills and to be careful because “people were dying from them”; Mosleh and his son Islam Yahya Mosleh, 18, who also worked at the store, were each charged with possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance, and more than 500 suspected kratom-related products were seized. Toxicology results from the medical examiner remained pending, Lafayette County Metro Narcotics said “packaging associated with kratom-related products was discovered at both locations” without stating that kratom itself was found, and the Moslehs have not been accused in either death. In August the DEA banned three kratom-related compounds, one of which an agent said was listed as an ingredient in products seized from the store and Hamilton’s room; kratom remains legal at the federal level, though Oxford banned its sale and possession in 2019 and Lafayette County in 2021.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 3 articles

3 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 3 of 3
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: DOJ, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice Department, Lafayette County Metro Narcotics and US Drug Enforcement Administration
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 3
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: court filing, charging document
Credits another outlet 0 of 3
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 3
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 2, 17:13 UTC by NewsNation, naming its source. First document 5 hours later, from CBS News (court filing).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage reports only a police "link" between packages at the death scenes and a local Oxford business, and never says that cause of death had not been established. Right-leaning coverage is simply more complete. It notes that toxicology results were still pending. It also states that the charged clerks are not accused in either death. County narcotics officials, in that fuller account, stopped short of saying kratom itself was found near the students. Without those caveats, the story reads as a solved fatality instead of an open investigation. Left-leaning coverage places "kratom-related packages" alongside the students. Right-leaning coverage describes similar packages of "synthetic kratom" found in their possession. One version is proximity at a scene. The other is ownership of a drug. What, if anything, actually killed Aidan Hamilton and Robert Strang?
Bottom line

The Hill never mentions unfinished toxicology, so its police-link write-up can be read as if kratom already killed the Ole Miss students. Fox News is the version that still treats cause of death as unknown.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • The Sept. 25 affidavit said toxicology results from the medical examiner were still pending. official statementin Fox News · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Court documents did not establish that kratom found near Aidan Hamilton came from the charged store. contextin Fox News · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Yahya Mohamed Mosleh and Islam Yahya Mosleh were each charged with possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance. individual casein Fox News · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • A clerk told an informant to be careful taking the pills because people were dying from them. individual casein Fox News · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Bank records linked Aidan Hamilton to purchases at Puffs Vape Tobacco & Beer. contextin Fox News · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
The Hill framed the episode as police announcing a link between kratom-related packages found alongside the two students and a local Oxford business that was the subject of a nearby bust, presenting the story as an official investigative connection rather than as a completed criminal case against the clerks.
The Right View
Fox News framed the story as two Oxford vape-store clerks jailed on federal drug charges after investigators traced the students’ purchases, leading with court documents, the undercover buy, Mosleh’s warning that “people were dying from them,” and the seizure of more than 500 suspected kratom-related products along with THC items. It highlighted American Kratom Association Senior Fellow Mac Haddow’s statement that the specific drug found near both students is illegal, while noting the Moslehs “aren’t accused in either deaths” and that toxicology results were still pending.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that authorities have announced only a link between packaging at the scenes and a nearby business, a framing supported by The Hill’s account of an official connection to a bust rather than a finding of cause of death. The right’s strongest argument is that a DEA affidavit, an undercover purchase, the clerk’s warning, a large product seizure, and a listed banned compound already document illegal distribution tied to the investigation, as Fox News reported from court filings. The central unresolved tension is whether pending toxicology and the lack of charges in the deaths keep this an unconfirmed product-link investigation, or whether the affidavit and the August compound ban already establish that illegal synthetic kratom was sold in connection with the students’ deaths.

4 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.