Kansas Man Charged With Threatening to Shoot Trump
Left 33%
Center 33%
Right 33%
1 left · 1 center · 1 right
What happened
Jaden J. Read, 24, of Clearwater, Kansas, was arrested Saturday and charged federally with making threats against President Donald Trump, two days before Trump’s scheduled Monday visit to Wichita. The investigation began October 15 after a Crime Stoppers tip flagged comments he allegedly posted under a KAKE News Facebook article about the trip, including “Let’s shoot Trump honestly, where’s our shooter? I’m tired of living this money life,” and a follow-up claiming he had ammunition. Under a KWCH 12 News Facebook article, prosecutors said he wrote “Can we shoot him in Kansas please I will myself” and, a minute later, “IK where your speech will be. Already mapped out roofs around.” He was held in federal custody pending a detention hearing. U.S. Attorney Ryan A. Kriegshauser said political violence and threats of political violence “will not be tolerated” and that the First Amendment “allows for robust disagreement but there are constraints.”
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 3 articles
2 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 3
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Kansas, Ryan A. Kriegshauser and U.S. Attorney's Office
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 3
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: court filing
- Credits another outlet 0 of 3
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 3
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 19, 22:46 UTC by NewsNation, naming its source. First document in the first report, from NewsNation (court filing).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Right-leaning coverage of the alleged posts is simply more complete. Those extra remarks, reported by Fox News, include a claim of ammunition and a later vow to shoot Trump himself. Left-leaning coverage notes the Saturday charge and rooftop research but, in The Hill, gives only the first Facebook post and never mentions ammunition. A reader of that shorter account would not see prosecutors alleging repeated threats with claimed means.
Right-leaning coverage leads with mapping as the story; left-leaning coverage leads with the post and mentions the roofs later. Headlines split the same way: Fox News opens on mapped rooftops and a DOJ tag, while The Hill opens on an arrest after a "let's shoot Trump" social media post.
Did investigators find ammunition or any sign he had actually been on those roofs?
Bottom line
The Hill never reports an ammunition claim in this case; that allegation shows up in Fox News’s account of the same federal charge.
The receipts — 4 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Prosecutors said Read immediately followed his first Facebook comment with another claiming he had ammunition and threatening to kill the president
- Investigators found additional alleged threats beneath a separate KWCH 12 News Facebook article
- U.S. Attorney Ryan A. Kriegshauser said political violence and threats of political violence will not be tolerated and cautioned people to stay within constitutionally protected speech
- The investigation began Oct. 15 after a Crime Stoppers tip about comments beneath a KAKE News Facebook article
The Left View
The Hill frames the story as an arrest that followed a social media post, leading with the “let’s shoot Trump” Facebook line and treating the alleged rooftop research as a secondary detail ahead of the Wichita-area rally. The account is brief, confined to the comments and the charge, and does not embed the case in a wider run of threat prosecutions.
The Right View
Fox News, citing the DOJ, leads with the alleged rooftop mapping and ammunition claim and presents the posts as a threat that triggered a federal investigation before the visit. It foregrounds Kriegshauser’s warning that political violence “will not be tolerated” and that the First Amendment has “constraints,” and it situates this arrest among other recent federal cases involving alleged threats against Trump.
Our Take (balanced)
Left-leaning coverage’s strongest argument is that the public record starts with Facebook comments under news articles, so the case can be read as enforcement against online speech; The Hill’s headline and lede treat the “let’s shoot Trump” post as the core event. Right-leaning coverage’s strongest argument is the alleged operational detail—mapping rooftops and claiming ammunition—which Fox News and the charging narrative treat as more than idle talk, acted on before the rally. The central unresolved tension is whether the posts were primarily crude political speech that drew a charge, or a location-specific threat that justified preemptive federal custody.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.