OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Huckabee Condemns Settler Attack on US Photojournalist

11 sources · updated 2026-10-19
Left 55% Center 27% Right 18%
6 left · 3 center · 2 right

What happened

On Friday, masked Israeli settlers attacked Palestinians harvesting olives in the occupied West Bank, including near Abu Falah, and beat Washington Post photojournalist Heidi Levine, a 63-year-old U.S. citizen living in Israel who was covering the harvest. Levine said she was pushed to the ground and kicked for more than 10 minutes despite a helmet and flak jacket; attackers stole her camera, passport and phone, and she required hand surgery for injuries that included broken ribs (one account also reported four broken vertebrae and lacerations). U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee called the assault a “despicable act of terror” and a “vicious and cowardly attack” by “masked cowards,” demanding a full investigation, arrests and prosecution; Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned “violence against anyone” but referred to the attack as “alleged” and said its circumstances remained unclear. Israel’s President Isaac Herzog called Levine to call the attack “outrageous and shocking,” and Israeli police said they would investigate.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 11 articles

8 of 9 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 8 of 9
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Matt Murray, Mike Huckabee, Heidi Levine, Isaac Herzog, Jasper Nathaniel and Reuters
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 9
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: video, footage circulating online
Credits another outlet 0 of 9
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 2 of 9
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 16, 14:09 UTC by Daily Caller, naming its source. First document 1 hour later, from CBS News (video).
Not counted 2
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage is simply more complete on the Israeli response, and that gap recasts Huckabee's statement as a split with Netanyahu. Netanyahu condemned violence against anyone but referred to the attack as "alleged" and said its circumstances remain unclear, per the Guardian. Levine told that paper she was shocked by his wording because he already had the evidence. Israel's president called her in hospital and said the attack weighed on his conscience, also in the Guardian. Right-leaning coverage mentions no Israeli official response and reports only Huckabee's rebuke and Levine's injuries in the Washington Examiner. Huckabee called the assault a "despicable act of terror" in the Guardian. Right-leaning coverage in the Washington Examiner describes a vicious and cowardly attack and does not carry that label from the same statement. Have Israeli police identified or detained anyone in the attack Huckabee said should be prosecuted?
Bottom line

A Washington Examiner reader never learns that Netanyahu called Heidi Levine's beating alleged after Huckabee demanded prosecutions.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Netanyahu referred to the attack as alleged and said its circumstances remain unclear official statementin The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • About 94% of investigations into settler violence since 2005 ended without an indictment numberin The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Levine suffered four broken vertebrae numberin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Attackers stole Levine's camera, passport, and phone individual casein The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The olive harvest was near Abu Falah contextin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets treated Huckabee’s wording as notably blunt given his hardline pro-Israel record and alliance with President Trump, and they contrasted it with Netanyahu’s “alleged” formulation, which Levine told the Associated Press left her “shocked and insulted” because he “had all the evidence on the table.” They placed the beating in a surge of settler disruption of the olive harvest ahead of Israel’s 27 October elections, quoting former military chief Gadi Eisenkot that the violence was “Jewish terrorism, under the auspices of the Israeli government” and was “burning away the little legitimacy the state of Israel still possesses.” Coverage cited Yesh Din’s finding that about 94% of settler-violence investigations since 2005 ended without indictment and 3% produced full or partial convictions, the Washington Post’s call for a transparent inquiry, and French and EU demands for arrests and “full accountability.” They also used a Saturday settler assault on French mayor Bernard Baudoux and threats to European diplomats and the archbishop of Cambrai near Taybeh to argue official “tolerance,” and highlighted European Commission vice-president Teresa Ribera’s caption on Levine’s hospital interview: “They want no witnesses.”
The Right View
The Washington Examiner framed the story mainly through Huckabee’s condemnation of a “vicious” and “cowardly” settler attack on Palestinian villagers that left Levine seriously injured even though her press credentials were in clear view. Its account stressed the ambassador’s denunciation and the photographer’s injuries rather than government complicity, electoral motives, or long-run prosecution rates.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that even a Trump-aligned ambassador with a hardline record called the beating a “despicable act of terror” and demanded prosecution, while Netanyahu labeled it “alleged”—a contrast backed by Yesh Din’s indictment figures and Eisenkot’s charge of “Jewish terrorism, under the auspices of the Israeli government.” The right-leaning account’s strongest argument is narrower: a U.S. envoy publicly denounced violence against an identifiable American journalist and Palestinian villagers as vicious and cowardly, presenting it as a criminal outrage requiring investigation rather than as proof of official policy. The central unresolved tension is whether the attack is an isolable crime Israeli authorities will prosecute, or evidence of settler violence the government tolerates and almost never convicts.

11 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.