OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Huckabee condemns Israeli settler violence as act of terror

6 sources · updated 2026-09-07
Left 50% Center 50% Right 0%
1 left · 1 center · 0 right

What happened

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited the West Bank village of Turmus Ayya and told Palestinian American residents that Israeli settler attacks—seizing property, burning cars, torching mosques, and vandalizing homes—go beyond crime to an "act of terror." He said he was speaking for U.S. citizens in the area, put the number of violent settlers at "a few hundred," and stated that the embassy cannot investigate crimes but that Israel must investigate and adjudicate them. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had recently condemned a "handful of rioters," and Israel’s Foreign Ministry called the settlers’ conduct "a disgrace." Settler attacks have surged since Hamas’s October 7, 2023, assault on Israel; the United Nations recorded more than 1,800 settler incidents in 2025, Palestinian health authorities report more than 1,000 Palestinians killed in the West Bank since October 2023, and dozens of Israelis have also been killed. Israel captured the West Bank in the 1967 war and has built nearly 150 settlements housing more than 500,000 people; the United Nations and much of the international community consider the territory occupied.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 6 articles

5 of 5 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 5 of 5
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Ambassador Mike Huckabee, Mike Huckabee, Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel’s Foreign Ministry
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 5
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 5
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 5
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 5, 17:54 UTC by CBS News, naming its source.
Not counted 1
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage of the ambassador's West Bank visit reports the terror label and skips the limit he put on who was to blame. Right-leaning coverage includes that limit, which changes whether this reads as a break with Israel or a rebuke of a fringe. He had come, left-leaning coverage in The Hill said, for U.S. citizens in the village and nearby towns. Huckabee's own count of those responsible, carried by the Daily Caller, was a few hundred. Netanyahu's wording, in the Washington Examiner, was a "handful of rioters," set beside the ambassador's terror label. Left-leaning write-ups of the visit never print that official phrase, so readers never see Israel's own softer wording next to terror. Have any settlers been arrested for the Turmus Ayya attacks Huckabee called terror?
Bottom line

Huckabee's terror label led on both sides. The Hill never added his own cap of a few hundred settlers, so the remark reads like a break with Israel rather than a blast at a fringe.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Huckabee put the number of violent settlers at a few hundred numberin Daily Caller · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Israel's Foreign Ministry described the settlers' conduct as a disgrace official statementin Washington Examiner, Daily Caller · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • UN figure of more than 1,800 settler attacks against Palestinians in 2025 numberin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • More than 1,000 Palestinians killed in the West Bank since October 2023 numberin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • About 80% of Turmus Ayya residents hold U.S. citizenship numberin Daily Caller · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning coverage treats Huckabee’s "act of terror" language as a significant U.S. acknowledgment of attacks on Palestinians, including American citizens. The New York Times goes further, arguing that settler violence "is reaching new heights" and that the problem is "not just" the settlers but "Israel" itself—casting the attacks as a state-level issue rather than isolated crime.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets report the same remarks but emphasize Huckabee’s focus on U.S. citizens, his "few hundred" estimate, and Israeli officials’ prior rebukes of a "handful of rioters" as a "disgrace." They frame the violence as limited criminal activity in the aftermath of the October 7 war, note Israeli fatalities alongside Palestinian ones, and underline that the embassy lacks investigative authority and can only press the host government to act.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that the recorded surge in attacks and fatalities, together with Huckabee’s "terror" language, supports the Times’s claim that the problem is Israel itself, not a handful of settlers. The right’s strongest argument is that both Huckabee and Israeli officials described a small number of perpetrators—"a few hundred," a "handful of rioters"—and that official Israeli condemnation undercuts the claim of state authorship. The central unresolved tension is whether the violence is a fringe criminal problem Israel is failing to stop, or a systemic product of occupation and government policy.

6 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.