OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Karoline Leavitt Joins Fox News as Contributor

9 sources · updated 2026-10-06
Left 50% Center 0% Right 50%
1 left · 0 center · 1 right

What happened

Karoline Leavitt, who served as White House press secretary from the start of President Donald Trump's second term until the end of August, will join Fox News as an on-air contributor on November 1. Fox News Media CEO Suzanne Scott announced the hiring on Monday, saying Leavitt's White House and campaign experience gives her "a distinct understanding of today's political landscape." Leavitt, 29, was the youngest person ever to hold the post; she left after the birth of her second child, writing that she could not be "the best mom my two young children deserve" while meeting the job's demands. Trump said she would remain one of his "top outside advisors," and the White House has not named a successor. She had been national press secretary for Trump's 2024 campaign before entering the West Wing.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 2 articles

1 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It started with unnamed sources; a named source appeared 9 hours later.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 1 of 2
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Suzanne Scott, Karoline Leavitt and President Donald Trump
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 2
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: press release, Truth Social post
Credits another outlet 0 of 2
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 2
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 5, 16:54 UTC by Business Insider, with no named source. First named source 9 hours later, from Breitbart. First document 9 hours later, from Breitbart (press release).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage frames Leavitt joining Fox as a Trump official landing at the president's preferred channel, and the Guardian calls Fox her former boss's "favorite network." Right-leaning coverage instead treats the move as the ordinary briefing-room-to-cable path both parties use. The Daily Caller makes that case by pointing to a Biden press secretary who took the same kind of TV job. Right-leaning coverage leads with enthusiasm from the White House she just left, and the Daily Wire carries a communications director calling her one of the "best and most effective communicators." Left-leaning coverage instead dwells on her fights with the press corps. Trump's weekend attack on Fox appears in the Guardian and in none of the right-leaning write-ups. Will her contributor contract let her remain one of Trump's outside advisors while she is on the air?
Bottom line

Only the Daily Caller puts Leavitt's Fox deal in the same pipeline as a Biden press secretary; the Guardian sends her to Trump's favorite network instead.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Former Biden press secretary Jen Psaki took a cable role at MS NOW after leaving the White House contextin Daily Wire, Daily Caller · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Leavitt interned at Fox News during the 2016 presidential election contextin Fox News · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • On-air contributor agreements are typically not full-time staff jobs and usually bar appearances on other networks contextin Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • As press secretary, Leavitt moved to exert greater control over the White House press pool contextin Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The White House has not yet named a new press secretary contextin Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning coverage treated the move as another turn of a Trump-to-Fox revolving door, noting that Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Kayleigh McEnany, Leavitt's predecessors from Trump's first administration, had also joined the network after leaving office. The Guardian called her a "logical fit" and focused on how, in the briefing room, she "moved to exert greater control over the press pool," created a "new media" seat "often filled by conservative commentators and pro-Trump personalities," and "frequently clashed with reporters." NBC News likewise described her as known for "fierce defenses of the president's record" and "occasional confrontations with political reporters." The Guardian also stressed that Trump, even as former aides keep landing at Fox, "still regularly criticizes Fox News for being insufficiently loyal," citing a Truth Social post the day before the announcement that accused Fox & Friends of not airing his rallies and of spending "more time talking to Communists, Socialists, and Dumocrats."
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets cast the contributor role as a conventional, bipartisan next step and as a platform to explain the administration's record. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung told the Daily Wire that Leavitt is "one of the best and most effective communicators around" and that "everybody at the White House is thrilled she has this opportunity to speak to the FOX News audience about President Trump's successful agenda." The Daily Wire and Daily Caller emphasized that press secretaries of both parties have long moved into television, naming Dana Perino after the George W. Bush White House, Jen Psaki after the Biden White House, Dee Dee Myers after the Clinton White House, and George Stephanopoulos at ABC. Fox News noted that Leavitt interned at the network during the 2016 election, appeared on it often while in office, and had developed "a reputation as an unwavering messenger of the president's agenda."
Our Take (balanced)
The left's strongest argument is that this is less a generic media hire than a continuation of a specific Trump–Fox circuit: two prior Trump press secretaries already made the same jump, and Leavitt's own briefing-room changes—tighter pool control and a seat reserved for conservative and "new media" voices—line up with the network's existing Trump-aligned roster. The right's strongest argument is that White House spokespeople have crossed into cable news for decades on both sides of the aisle, with Perino, Psaki, Myers, and Stephanopoulos as clear precedents, so treating this hire as uniquely compromising ignores a well-worn path. The unresolved tension is whether Fox's concentration of former Trump officials makes it functionally an extension of the administration's communications operation, or whether that charge simply redescribes a revolving door that also runs from Democratic White Houses to other networks.

9 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.