OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

FBI Co-Deputy Director Andrew Bailey Resigns

11 sources · updated 2026-09-29
Left 50% Center 17% Right 33%
3 left · 1 center · 2 right

What happened

Andrew Bailey, formerly Missouri’s attorney general, announced on Monday that he is stepping down as FBI co-deputy director after about one year, saying he is returning to his family in Missouri; the resignation is set to take effect October 2. He joined the bureau in September 2025 in a newly created co-deputy director post under Director Kash Patel, first serving alongside then-Deputy Director Dan Bongino, who left in January and was succeeded as co-deputy by career FBI special agent Christopher Raia. In a social-media post, Bailey thanked President Donald Trump, Attorney General Todd Blanche, and Patel, writing that “we have delivered historic results in our mission to Make America Safe Again”; Patel replied that Bailey’s “fantastic contribution instituting critical reforms which resulted in our historic success will live on.” An internal FBI email, according to people familiar with the matter, also cited family reasons. During his tenure, Bailey was present in January when FBI agents executed a search warrant at a Fulton County, Georgia, election office and seized ballots and other materials related to the 2020 presidential election.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 6 articles

6 of 6 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 6 of 6
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: FBI Deputy Director Andrew Bailey, Andrew Bailey, Kash Patel and New York Times
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 1 of 6
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: social media post
Credits another outlet 0 of 6
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 2 of 6
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 28, 16:31 UTC by The Hill, naming its source. First document within the hour, from The Guardian (social media post).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning coverage in the Daily Wire leaves out the assignment that makes Andrew Bailey's resignation more than a family note. Left-leaning coverage in the Guardian reports he had been overseeing election-related investigations, including a January search of a Fulton County election office that seized 2020 ballots. Readers of that right-leaning account would not know a senior official tied to those probes is leaving with the midterms weeks away, so the exit looks like a private choice rather than a vacancy on election probes. The same resignation gets opposite labels. Left-leaning coverage in Mother Jones calls Bailey an "anti-abortion zealot," a phrase right-leaning coverage in the Daily Wire never uses, calling him a conservative favorite instead. Who, if anyone, now oversees the election investigations Bailey was said to run?
Bottom line

The Daily Wire wrote Bailey's exit as a family goodbye Patel praised; it never mentions the Fulton County ballot raid that the Guardian treats as his FBI job. That is the difference between a dad going home and a hole in election investigations before the midterms.

The receipts — 2 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Bailey had been overseeing Trump election-related investigations and was present at a January Fulton County search that seized 2020 ballots contextin Guardian, Mother Jones · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Bailey's resignation takes effect on October 2 numberin Daily Caller, Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets framed the exit as further turmoil and politicization under Patel rather than a routine family decision. NBC News and The Guardian stressed the unusual co-deputy setup that originally paired Bailey with podcaster Bongino and noted Bailey’s role overseeing some of Trump’s election-related investigations, including the Fulton County search that two Democratic senators called “unprecedented.” The Guardian reported mass departures of career agents, “some of whom have been forced out for perceived political bias” or who left “for fear of retribution,” and cited New York Times reporting that Bailey and Raia had a “contentious relationship with Patel and went long stretches without speaking to each other.” Mother Jones labeled him “A Leading Anti-Abortion Zealot,” arguing the post gave him “enormous power over the agency’s operations—including, potentially, investigations against abortion advocates, providers, and patients,” and cited MS Now that he was upset about demotions of two Washington field-office counterterrorism agents over a threat assessment involving calls to Katie Miller and frustrated at not being named to replace Patel.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets treated the move chiefly as a personal decision after a year of service, leading with Bailey’s and Patel’s statements about “historic results,” “critical reforms,” and returning the FBI to its “core mission.” The Daily Wire and Daily Caller highlighted Bailey’s Missouri AG record, including a $24 billion default judgment against China over COVID-19, and Patel’s thanks that he helped “return the FBI to its core mission and fulfill President Trump’s promise to make America safe again.” Several conservative outlets noted New York Times reporting that Patel and Bailey “did not get along well and sometimes went long periods without talking,” and Breitbart relayed that he was “annoyed” about the demotion of two counterterrorism agents over handling of harassing calls to Stephen Miller’s wife, but they did not present abortion litigation, election oversight, or bureau-wide politicization as the story of the resignation.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is a documented pattern of short tenures and internal friction: Bailey lasted about a year in an unprecedented co-deputy structure, The New York Times reported long stretches without communication with Patel, and MS Now reported anger over agent demotions—set against The Guardian’s account of career-agent exodus. The right’s strongest argument is the only on-the-record explanation from the principals—Bailey’s family-reasons announcement and Patel’s praise for reforms—together with no official finding that he was forced out. The central unresolved tension is whether this is ordinary personal choice (a senior administration official told Axios Bailey “wasn’t doing anything” and “quit because he had nothing to do”) or a symptom of factional strain and politicized management that left-leaning outlets infer from turnover, the Fulton County raid, and Bailey’s prior activism—claims the public record neither establishes as the cause of this resignation nor fully rules out.

11 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.