OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Trump Border Czar Responds to Lawsuit Over Woman Killed by ICE

17 sources · updated 2026-10-02
Left 0% Center 100% Right 0%
0 left · 2 center · 0 right

What happened

On January 7, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer Jonathan Ross fatally shot 37-year-old Renee Good in the driver’s seat of her SUV during a street encounter in Minneapolis, an incident recorded on cellphone video. The shooting took place during Operation Metro Surge, a Trump administration deployment of thousands of immigration agents to the Twin Cities that began about a month earlier and ended in February. Video showed officers ordering Good out of the car as she turned the steering wheel away from Ross and began to drive; multiple shots were fired and the SUV crashed into a parked car. Administration officials including President Donald Trump and then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Good was an agitator who tried to run Ross over and that he was treated for injuries, while witnesses told NBC News that Ross did not appear to be in the vehicle’s direct path. Nine months later, Good’s family filed two federal civil lawsuits: one against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act alleging wrongful death, battery, assault, false imprisonment, emotional distress, and negligence, and a second naming Ross, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, Noem, White House border czar Tom Homan, former Border Patrol commander Greg Bovino, and others, alleging a conspiracy to interfere with civil rights.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 10 articles

3 of 5 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report. Lauren Bis denied part of it on the record.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 3 of 5
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Renee Good’s family, Becca Good and Antonio Romanucci
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 5
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: court filing, civil lawsuits
Credits another outlet 0 of 5
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 5
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
On-record denial 1
A named person or institution says the claim, or part of it, is not true. It is on the record — someone signed their name to it — but it is not confirmation, so it never counts toward On the record. Criticizing or dissenting from a decision is not a denial. The count is how many people or institutions deny it; each is listed with the first article that carried the denial. Here: Lauren Bis (BBC, Oct 1, 20:30 UTC)
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 1, 16:11 UTC by Mother Jones, naming its source. First document in the first report, from Mother Jones (court filing).
Not counted 5
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage never reports that Good's own lawsuit says she stopped her car after spotting ICE agents and honked to alert neighbors, the choice that put her in the street that morning. Mother Jones instead describes ICE agents stopping their car, which reads as a stop initiated by officers. Right-leaning coverage, in the Daily Wire, leads by calling her an "anti-ICE activist" and recounts the halt, the honk, and the filming that followed. Left-leaning coverage and right-leaning coverage do not agree on what the Minneapolis deployment was. Mother Jones called it a "violent occupation." The Daily Wire called the same operation "historic immigration enforcement." Did any official reconstruction find Good's SUV on course to hit the officer when he fired?
Bottom line

Mother Jones has ICE stopping Renee Good's car. The Daily Wire, citing her family's complaint, has her stopping it herself after she spotted agents.

The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Good's lawsuit says she stopped her car after spotting ICE agents and honked her horn to alert her neighbors contextin Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • The second lawsuit alleges a conspiracy to interfere with civil rights by senior federal officials and immigration agents contextin Mother Jones · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The lawsuit alleges Ross moved out of the car's path before leaning toward the vehicle and firing individual casein Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • The Hennepin County attorney is investigating the agents who killed Good and has not filed charges in her shooting contextin Mother Jones · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The second suit alleges a discriminatory conspiracy targeting Somali and Hispanic communities contextin CBS News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The lawsuit stated the campaign produced more than $200 million in economic damage to a single city numberin Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets present the filings as a bid for accountability after what they call an unlawful killing during a militarized immigration crackdown. NBC News quotes Good’s brother, Brent Ganger, saying what happened “is not what America is about” and that “the Constitution must be the roadmap back to decency and the rule of law,” and attorney Antonio M. Romanucci hoping the suits uncover “this unlawful use of deadly force and the nefarious conspiracies behind the invasion of American cities by American law enforcement officers.” Mother Jones frames the episode as part of a “violent occupation and mass deportations campaign,” stresses that officials “called her a domestic terrorist,” and reports the second complaint as alleging a conspiracy by Miller, Noem, Homan, Bovino, and others to interfere with civil rights, including a discriminatory campaign targeting Somali and Hispanic communities and “silencing their allies.” Those sources treat the established video of Good turning away from Ross, witness accounts that he was not in the SUV’s path, and later Minneapolis shootings involving Alex Pretti and Julio Sosa-Celis as showing excessive force and a pattern, not a justified shooting.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets identify Good as an “anti-ICE activist” and locate the shooting inside a large enforcement push to arrest illegal immigrants that ICE Watch groups were trying to disrupt. The Daily Wire reports Noem’s account that Good’s actions were “an act of domestic terrorism” intended to “kill or cause bodily harm to agents,” that she had been “stalking and impeding their work” and “blocking officers in with her vehicle,” refused orders to get out, and “proceeded to weaponize her vehicle” and “attempted to run” over an officer who fired while “fearing for his life.” Those sources also note Ross’s hospitalization and describe Good as having stopped after spotting agents, honked to alert neighbors, and been accompanied by a partner who filmed and confronted officers—conduct they frame as obstruction of federal operations rather than passive observation. Subsequent coverage of Tom Homan emphasizes that he called the death “tragic” and said he wished Good “was alive today,” while defending ICE arrests.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is the video and witness record already established above—Good turning the wheel away as she began to drive, and witnesses saying Ross was not in the SUV’s direct path—which, if credited, undercuts the claim that she was trying to run him over. The right’s strongest argument is the same encounter’s other established elements: officers had ordered her out, the vehicle was moving near agents, and officials said Ross feared for his life and was treated for injuries, which they treat as a reasonable-fear shooting during an obstructed enforcement operation. The central unresolved tension is whether the moving SUV was a lethal threat that justified deadly force, and whether senior officials’ statements and their direction of the Minneapolis operation can support a conspiracy claim against them or only a tort action against the United States and the officer.

17 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.