Eric Schmidt's early Anthropic stake could reach $20B in IPO
Left 0%
Center 33%
Right 67%
0 left · 1 center · 2 right
What happened
Bloomberg first reported on October 20, 2026, citing people familiar with the matter, that former Google CEO Eric Schmidt owns roughly 1% of Anthropic after investing tens of millions of dollars in the AI startup's 2021 Series A round, when the company was valued at $461 million according to PitchBook. Investors have recently indicated a potential IPO valuation of $1.8 trillion to $2 trillion, which would make a 1% stake worth as much as $20 billion; at Anthropic's most recent $965 billion valuation the stake would be worth nearly $10 billion. Bloomberg's Billionaires Index puts Schmidt's existing fortune at $57.5 billion. Anthropic could begin marketing an IPO as soon as the week of November 9, 2026. Schmidt and Anthropic declined to comment, and Bloomberg said it could not determine whether Schmidt had sold any shares; TechCrunch credited Bloomberg as the origin of the report, and the New York Post cited Bloomberg as its first on-record source.
Sourcing check · Partly on the record · 3 articles
1 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 1 of 3
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Bloomberg
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 3
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
- Credits another outlet 1 of 3
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Bloomberg
- Unnamed sources 3 of 3
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this. Here: e.g. “people familiar with the matter”
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 20, 16:40 UTC by New York Post, naming its source.
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK.
Only right-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days;
Business Insider reported it on 2026-10-08.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage has not reported this story at all. Right-leaning coverage says Eric Schmidt owns about 1% of Anthropic from an early Series A check. The paper value of that stake could reach $20 billion, NY Post reports, if the company lists near the top of investor estimates. Both NY Post and Breitbart note that Schmidt and Anthropic declined to comment, and that it remains unknown whether any of the shares were sold. A reader of left-leaning outlets would miss the ownership claim and the coming IPO window entirely.
Right-leaning outlets split on emphasis. NY Post follows the money with a long close on Schmidt's marriage and later relationships. Breitbart instead calls him a "Democrat Mega-Donor" and treats the listing as a payday for Effective Altruism-aligned founders.
Through which of Schmidt's funds is the Anthropic stake actually held?
Bottom line
No left-leaning outlet has reported the Anthropic stake that NY Post values at up to $20 billion.
The receipts — 2 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Schmidt's stake could be worth as much as $20 billion
- Schmidt and Anthropic declined to comment
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets the New York Post and Breitbart amplified Bloomberg's account. The Post stressed the scale of the possible return—a more than 4,300-fold increase from the Series A—compared it with Schmidt's earlier Uber investment, listed his other AI bets (Mistral AI, Reflection AI, World Labs), and devoted substantial space to his personal relationships. Breitbart identified Schmidt as a Democrat mega-donor, tied Anthropic to AI-doomer messaging and Effective Altruism, said the IPO would mint new leftist billionaires, and framed CEO Dario Amodei's calls for an AI slowdown as industry self-interest. Center-leaning TechCrunch reported the same 1% claim and noted it is about half the 2% stake attributed to Amodei, without the political or personal framing.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is moderately substantive: it involves named actors, a specific 2021 funding round, PitchBook valuation data, and checkable dollar figures, but the core claim that Schmidt still owns about 1% of Anthropic rests on unnamed Bloomberg sources rather than public filings or on-the-record confirmation. Schmidt and Anthropic have declined to comment, and it is not established whether any of the stake has been sold, so the $10–20 billion paper gain is an estimate contingent on both ownership and a still-unpriced IPO. No left-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for Anthropic's IPO registration statement, any beneficial-ownership disclosures, and on-the-record comments from Schmidt or the company that would confirm or revise the 1% figure.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.