El-Sayed Compares Himself to JFK Over Dual Loyalties Claims
Left 0%
Center 0%
Right 100%
0 left · 0 center · 3 right
What happened
On a Saturday broadcast of MS NOW Reports, Michigan Democratic U.S. Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed, interviewed by Ali Velshi, compared questions about alleged family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood to the scrutiny John F. Kennedy faced in 1960 over his Catholic faith and possible loyalty to the Vatican. El-Sayed said the questions were meant to insinuate dual loyalties, called that assumption “crazy,” and said he is running to be Michigan’s next senator, not “the first anything.” The exchange followed Washington Free Beacon reporting on 2012 social-media posts by El-Sayed’s half-sister, Eman Abdelhadi, describing their mother Fatten Elkomy’s 1970s college activism in Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood and saying the family had “long been MB.” El-Sayed has denied personal ties to the group and said he was not raised by his mother; Michigan GOP communications director Ted Goodman called the JFK comparison a false equivalence.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 3 articles
3 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 3 of 3
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Abdul El-Sayed, Ted Goodman, Whoopi Goldberg, Sunny Hostin and Alyssa Farah Griffin
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 3
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
- Credits another outlet 0 of 3
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 3
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 18, 14:23 UTC by Breitbart, naming its source.
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK.
Only right-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days;
The Hill reported it on 2026-10-18.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage has not reported this story. Right-leaning coverage reports that Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed likened questions about Muslim Brotherhood ties to the Catholic loyalty tests John F. Kennedy faced, calling dual-loyalty assumptions "crazy." That coverage also includes a Michigan GOP claim that the Catholic Church and the Muslim Brotherhood are not analogous, plus posts in which El-Sayed's half-sister described their mother's activism in the group. A reader of the silent side would miss the comparison, those family posts, and the rebuttal.
The shortest right-leaning account, published by Breitbart, gives only the analogy and El-Sayed's pledge to protect the right to choose, LGBTQ rights, and people who choose not to pray. A longer account on Fox News instead leads with the GOP rebuttal and the half-sister's description of family history. Right-leaning outlets thus split on whether the news is the analogy or the family allegations.
Does any reporting show El-Sayed himself joined or funded the Muslim Brotherhood, apart from relatives?
Bottom line
Left-leaning outlets have not covered El-Sayed's JFK comparison at all. Their readers never see Fox News citing his half-sister's post that her family has long been MB.
The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
- El-Sayed compared dual-loyalty questions to John F. Kennedy's Vatican scrutiny and said it is crazy to assume he has dual loyalties
- Michigan GOP communications director Ted Goodman called the JFK comparison a false equivalence, saying the Catholic Church and the Muslim Brotherhood are not analogous
- In a 2012 post, El-Sayed's half-sister Eman Abdelhadi wrote that she had an amazing talk with her mom about her activism in the Muslim Brotherhood during the early 70s while she was in college
- Abdelhadi also posted that her family has long been MB but that it has navigated the political sphere poorly/destructively
- El-Sayed said he has never had these conversations with his mother and was not raised by her
- The Treasury Department designated the Egyptian and Jordanian branches of the Muslim Brotherhood as Specially Designated Global Terrorists in January
The Right View
Breitbart and Fox News reported El-Sayed’s on-air JFK comparison and his claim that questions about the Muslim Brotherhood, terrorism, and radical Islamism are loyalty smears. They detailed Abdelhadi’s posts about the family’s Brotherhood history, El-Sayed’s prior Meet the Press denial and later exchange with Tom Llamas, and reporting on father-in-law Tayeb Jukaku’s ties to ISNA and CAIR’s Michigan chapter plus a $200,000 super PAC contribution. Fox quoted Goodman saying the Catholic Church and the Muslim Brotherhood are not analogous and that the allegations rest on reported facts, not faith. A related Fox piece covered The View: Whoopi Goldberg and Sunny Hostin praised the JFK analogy and cited Islamophobia, including Trump calling El-Sayed a jihadist; Sara Haines said the comparison was inequitable because reported terrorist-organization ties differ from religious prejudice; Ana Navarro called the Brotherhood “practically defunct” in Egypt. Human rights attorney Brooke Goldstein told Fox the Kennedy analogy was a deflection from unanswered national-security questions after U.S. designations of Brotherhood branches as terrorist entities.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive on checkable elements: a named candidate’s on-the-record interview, named relatives, contemporaneous social-media posts as reported by the Washington Free Beacon, campaign and GOP statements, and official U.S. designations of certain Muslim Brotherhood branches. Established: El-Sayed made the JFK comparison and denied personal Brotherhood membership; Abdelhadi’s posts exist as reported; no public evidence in this coverage shows El-Sayed himself belonged to the organization. Still alleged or unresolved: the weight of family and in-law associations, whether those associations imply dual loyalties, and how far sister posts and in-law organizational ties should be treated as relevant to the candidate. No left-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for primary documents (full posts, campaign filings), on-the-record replies from El-Sayed and opponent Mike Rogers, and any independent corroboration or retraction of the family-history claims.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.