OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Trump Warns Data Center Opponents Risk Becoming Backwards and Poor

6 sources · updated 2026-09-03
Left 33% Center 0% Right 67%
2 left · 0 center · 4 right

What happened

President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that “The only reason that communities throughout the U.S.A. should not want Data Centers is if they want to end up being backwards and poor,” adding that those who want to be “successful and rich, with far lower taxes and jobs all over the place” should “let Data Reign” and that “there are plenty of other places that want them.” On Monday, Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) told MeidasTouch’s Pablo Manríquez, “I guess I’m backwards and poor,” and suggested the facilities be built on military installations instead. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) quipped that a company should “put a data center up in Mar-a-Lago,” Trump’s Florida resort. On CNN, Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) said Trump was “actually right, overall” on data centers and that Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro—who had issued an executive order placing new environmental regulations on data-center development—was “scared by the polls.” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said on a Breitbart roundtable that he has “a sense that China is funding the opposition to AI centers.”
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage skips the governor-level pauses already in force, so Trump's warning reads as an insult with no policy backdrop. Right-leaning coverage is more complete on those actions. Texas paused new data-center connections to its grid, according to Washington Examiner. A one-year New York moratorium on converting defunct power plants to data centers appears there too. The Hill ran lawmaker one-liners and did not mention those state moves. Right-leaning coverage also puts Chinese funding of opposition in the foreground; left-leaning coverage never mentions China. Sen. Ron Johnson told Breitbart he has a sense that China is funding opposition to the centers. The Hill stays on jokes and does not discuss foreign funding. What do these centers actually draw from a local grid, and where is the evidence that China is paying to stop them?
Bottom line

The Hill treated Trump's data-center warning as joke fodder and never mentioned Texas had already paused new grid hookups for those facilities.

The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Gov. Greg Abbott paused new data-center connections to the Texas grid official statementin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Sen. John Fetterman said Trump is right on data centers official statementin Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Rep. Tim Burchett replied to Trump, 'I guess I'm backwards and poor' official statementin The Hill · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Axios reported China has been secretly funding grassroots opposition to data centers contextin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Texas AG Ken Paxton proposed holding data centers criminally liable for customers' AI outputs official statementin Washington Examiner · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Rep. Tim Burchett suggested data centers could be built on military installations instead official statementin The Hill · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning coverage treated Trump’s remark as a blanket insult that even a Republican rejected. The Hill highlighted Burchett’s reply and his proposal to put data centers on military installations rather than in civilian communities. It also featured Ocasio-Cortez’s Mar-a-Lago jab, which implied the president would not welcome the same facilities next to his own property.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets framed Trump’s post as “economic sense” and a core piece of competing with China on artificial intelligence. The Washington Examiner called opposing digital infrastructure “as bipartisan as it is nonsensical,” pointing to Republican and Democratic governors who have paused, audited, or newly regulated data centers, and argued the facilities “dramatically lower property taxes” by expanding local tax bases and adding jobs; it also cited Axios reporting that China has been secretly funding “grassroots” opposition. Johnson said water-resource concerns are “way overstated” because of that propaganda and asked whether Americans “really want to lose the race to AI.” Fetterman, quoted approvingly, said “a lot of the opposition has been driven by the CCP,” that data-center use of land and water is tiny compared with other economic activity, and that Pennsylvania is “energy rich,” “water rich,” and “land rich.”
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that local resistance is not a wish to be “backwards and poor”: a Republican member of Congress rejected that binary, and Ocasio-Cortez’s Mar-a-Lago line pressed the point that siting costs fall on particular communities. The right’s strongest argument is that data centers are infrastructure for an AI contest with China the United States cannot afford to lose, with Fetterman and Johnson citing alleged Chinese funding of opposition and pointing to tax-base, jobs, and relatively small land-and-water claims as evidence the local costs are overstated. The central unresolved tension is whether those local burdens on power, water, and community character are genuine reasons to refuse projects, or overstated—and possibly foreign-amplified—obstacles to a national buildout.

6 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.