OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Data Centers Spark Growing Political Backlash

2 sources · updated 2026-08-31
Left 100% Center 0% Right 0%
2 left · 0 center · 0 right

What happened

Local opposition has delayed or blocked a large volume of proposed U.S. AI data-center projects, with Data Center Watch reporting about $130 billion in projects disrupted in the first quarter of this year. Hundreds of counties and municipalities have adopted bans or moratoria, and specific fights include a proposed 550-acre Google facility in Monrovia, Indiana. Candidates in several midterm races, including Senate contests in Ohio and Michigan, have campaigned against data-center construction, and the National Republican Senatorial Committee called the issue a sleeper risk. Community complaints center on water use, electricity rates, emissions, noise, and land use; some unions and operators say the sites still create construction and skilled-trades work.
BLINDSPOT. Only left-leaning outlets are covering this story — the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication, so a reader on that side would not know a data-center revolt is already a midterm issue on both sides of the aisle. Left-leaning coverage reports local bans, stalled projects, and Republican warnings, including an NRSC memo treating data centers as a sleeper issue for the cycle. The same coverage disagrees with itself on whether anyone wants the facilities: one account notes unions backing them for construction and trades work, while the other never mentions a constituency in favor. Left-leaning coverage also splits on what belongs in the story. CNBC spends its opening on AI anxiety and a social-media settlement, with data centers arriving later as a backyard sore point. The Guardian never mentions that settlement or the license-plate cameras, and stays on the warehouses and the midterm map. What share of a typical household power bill in these counties is actually coming from data centers?
Bottom line

Right-leaning outlets have not reported the data-center fight at all, even though CNBC put first-quarter projects blocked or delayed at around $130 billion.

The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • The National Republican Senatorial Committee warned that data centers have become a sleeper issue for the entire midterm election cycle official statementin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Around $130 billion worth of data center projects were blocked or delayed in the first quarter numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • More than 500 counties and municipalities have passed datacenter bans or moratoria numberin The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Three-quarters of Americans oppose local datacenter development numberin The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The president's plans include waiving Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act requirements for datacenter approvals contextin The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Texas Governor Greg Abbott said datacenters had dug their own grave official statementin The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
CNBC and The Guardian, the outlets covering this, present data-center fights as the physical core of a broader bipartisan tech backlash that also includes distrust of AI executives, social-media harms, and tools such as Flock Safety cameras. They cite Pew Research showing more than half of Americans more concerned than excited about AI, Data Center Watch’s dollar figures on delayed projects, organizers pushing a national moratorium, and both Democratic and Republican candidates attacking opponents over data-center support. The Guardian frames the issue as uniting MAGA voters and progressives against “tech oligarchs” and a chance to redraw politics around billionaire power; CNBC notes the same cross-party anger but also quotes defenders, including the Cato Institute on union support, hyperscalers citing demand, and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei calling the moment a “crisis of trust.”
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive on several checkable points and thin on others. Established as reported events, not rumor: named local fights (including Monrovia, Indiana), public statements by named candidates and officials, the NRSC “sleeper issue” warning as cited, Pew’s concern-vs-excitement finding, and Meta’s bipartisan state-AG settlement. Scale claims — $130 billion delayed in one quarter, 500-plus local bans, three-quarters of Americans opposed — rest on a tracker, organizers, and outlet-cited polls and are not independently restated here. Interpretive claims that data centers will realign national politics or are mainly a “manifestation of greed” remain argument, not fact. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for Data Center Watch’s methodology and project list, the full NRSC memo, utility and company filings on cancelled capacity, and whether midterm ads and results treat data centers as a decisive issue.

2 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.