OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Chinese Billionaire Fathers Over 100 Children via US Surrogates

3 sources · updated 2026-09-16
Left 0% Center 0% Right 100%
0 left · 0 center · 3 right

What happened

CBS News reported that an American surrogate identified as Judy learned from leaked documents that the intended father of the child she is carrying is Xu Bo, a Chinese national and founder of gaming firm Duoyi Network. Judy said she had signed with the U.S. agency Patriot Conceptions believing she was carrying for a single father and that she felt misled after the connection was shown to her. Coverage of the investigation, and of a related Wall Street Journal inquiry, has linked Xu to many children born through American surrogates; Xu has said he has custody of 12 such children, while a former partner in a custody dispute has claimed a much higher number and some reporting has cited more than 100. Children born on U.S. soil in these arrangements receive U.S. citizenship at birth. Xu posted a photograph on Chinese social media appearing to show more than 100 infants and said that more children bring more blessings and that he wants his actions to benefit the long-term development of the Chinese nation.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 3 articles

3 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report, credited to CBS News.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 3 of 3
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Judy, CBS News, Ron DeSantis, Wall Street Journal, Tom Cotton and Department of Justice
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 3
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: leaked documents, investigation, social media post
Credits another outlet 1 of 3
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: CBS News
Unnamed sources 1 of 3
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 14, 16:19 UTC by Daily Caller, crediting CBS News, naming its source. First document in the first report, from Daily Caller (leaked documents).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
BLINDSPOT. Only right-leaning outlets are covering this story — the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage has not reported this story at all. Right-leaning coverage says a Chinese video-game executive used American surrogates to father more than 100 children who become U.S. citizens at birth, and that a surrogate learned his identity only from CBS News. Scale is unsettled even on the right, from Xu's claim of 12 children in custody to an ex-partner's much larger figure carried by Daily Caller. A reader of the silent side would miss both the citizenship pathway and the surrogate's account that she was misled. Emphasis splits on the right: Daily Wire leads with whether birthright citizenship can be obtained this way, while Daily Caller leads with the surrogate learning the father's identity only after she was already pregnant. Who is raising these children, and do they remain in the United States after birth?
Bottom line

Left-leaning outlets have not run the Xu Bo story, so their readers miss Daily Wire's charge that he is effectively purchasing U.S. citizenship through American surrogates.

The receipts — 6 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Xu Bo has been linked to more than 100 children born through U.S. surrogates, who receive citizenship at birth numberin Daily Caller, Daily Wire, Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • China accounted for 19,718 of the U.S. assisted-reproduction cycles performed for non-residents from 2014 to 2022 numberin Daily Caller · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • The Department of Justice said actors exploiting loopholes to obtain automatic citizenship for their children pose a national security threat official statementin Daily Caller · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Judy became a surrogate after an Instagram ad promising $120,000 individual casein Daily Wire, Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • At least 107 Chinese-run surrogacy companies operate in California numberin Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Florida lawmakers have moved to restrict surrogacy involving residents of countries of concern, including China contextin Daily Wire · absent from left-leaning coverage
The Right View
Daily Caller, Daily Wire, and Breitbart have treated a CBS News investigation as the core of the story, centering Judy’s account that she was blindsided, leaked documents naming Xu Bo, and his social-media photo and comments about children and the Chinese nation. They frame the practice as cross-border surrogacy that confers automatic U.S. citizenship on children of a foreign national, describe it as exploiting birthright-citizenship rules, and quote Department of Justice language about actors seeking loopholes to obtain citizenship as a national-security concern. The outlets cite an ex-partner’s claim of as many as 300 children, Xu’s disputed figures (including custody of 12 and later references to a little over 100), a $120,000 surrogate payment, Florida moves to restrict surrogacy involving “countries of concern,” a Senate letter seeking a probe of Chinese-run agencies, and data on assisted-reproduction cycles by non-U.S. residents, with China a large share. Critics in the coverage, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, call the citizenship outcome inconsistent with a sound reading of the 14th Amendment.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it is built on a named CBS News investigation, leaked documents identifying Xu Bo, an on-the-record surrogate, a named U.S. agency (Patriot Conceptions), Xu’s own posts and statements, and a public custody dispute—not on a single unverified rumor. Established in the reporting are Judy’s contract and reaction, Xu’s identity as a Chinese gaming executive, his photograph and comments, and that children born in the United States through these arrangements are citizens under current law. The precise number of children is alleged and disputed, ranging from Xu’s figure of 12 in his custody, to reports of a little over 100, to an ex-partner’s claim of 300, and is not independently verified in the material provided. No left-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch next for a fuller on-the-record response from Xu or Duoyi Network, documentary corroboration of how many children were born in the United States, any Justice Department or congressional inquiry, and state or federal action on surrogacy and birthright citizenship.

3 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.