OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Charlie Kirk Family Blames University for His Killing

11 sources · updated 2026-09-18
Left 50% Center 0% Right 50%
1 left · 0 center · 1 right

What happened

On September 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old co-founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot in the neck while speaking at an outdoor event on the Utah Valley University campus in Orem, Utah, before roughly 3,000 people; authorities say the shot was fired from the roof of the Losee Center, about 415 feet away. Tyler Robinson, 23, of Utah, has been charged with aggravated murder, has pleaded not guilty, and prosecutors are seeking the death penalty. On September 9, 2026, Kirk's estate, his widow Erika Kirk, and their two children filed a notice of claim with the Utah Attorney General's office — a required step under state law before a lawsuit — naming UVU, the State of Utah, the UVU Police Department, Police Chief Jeffrey Long, then-president Astrid Tuminez, and possibly others. The notice alleges the university failed to conduct a meaningful risk assessment, assigned only six campus officers, did not monitor surveillance cameras in real time, and did not secure rooftops after Turning Point USA texted Long about nearby student roof access and he replied, "I got you covered." UVU said it was aware of the notice and would address it through established processes, and after the shooting it announced a third-party independent review of the event.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 2 articles

2 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 2 of 2
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Turning Point USA, D Loren Washburn and Sharon Turner
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 2
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: Notice of Claim, wrongful death notice
Credits another outlet 0 of 2
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 2
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 16, 17:21 UTC by Breitbart, naming its source. First document in the first report, from Breitbart (Notice of Claim).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning coverage reports that the campus police chief asked for extra officers and the university president refused. Left-leaning coverage describes an understaffed outdoor event without that refused request, which changes who set the headcount. Without that detail, understaffing reads as a miss rather than a rejected ask. That denial appears in the family's notice, per The Federalist. The six-officer figure and the chief's account of coordinating with Kirk's team appear in ABC News. Right-leaning coverage leads with Turning Point's rooftop warning and the chief's reply, "I got you covered." Left-leaning coverage in the Guardian opens on the family's blame. A post-shooting review cited there found no bag checks. What did Kirk's private security do about the rooftops after campus police said they were covered?
Bottom line

ABC News covers the Kirk family's security-failure notice without the claim that UVU's president refused extra officers, a detail The Federalist treats as the reason the rally was understaffed.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Police Chief Jeffrey Long sought more officers and President Astrid Tuminez denied the request official statementin The Federalist · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • UVU had spent at least $240,000 on an independent review still unreleased a year after the shooting numberin The Federalist · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • UVU police had no written security plan and no pre-event security briefing contextin Daily Caller, Breitbart · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • UVU said it was aware of the notice and that its focus remains on supporting the campus community official statementin BBC, The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Campus police coordinated with Kirk's eight-person private security team numberin The Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets treated the filing primarily as a legal development: a notice of claim that preserves the family's right to sue, quoting its allegation of a "series of stunning failures and reckless decisions" while giving comparable space to UVU's statement that it "addresses legal matters consistent with our established processes" and that its "focus remains on supporting our campus community." They described Kirk as a conservative activist, listed the notice's cited examples of political violence (including the 2024 rooftop attempt on Donald Trump, the 2025 killing of a Minnesota legislator, and the 2022 attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband), and reported Robinson's not-guilty plea and the state's death-penalty request. The Guardian added that UVU "has faced harsh criticism for a lack of key safety measures" and that an Associated Press review found the campus did not use several practices that have become standard elsewhere, including recommended staffing levels, rooftop drones, coordination with local police, bag checks, and metal detectors. Coverage also noted UVU's post-shooting pledge of a comprehensive independent review.
The Right View
Right-leaning outlets framed the death as an "entirely preventable" assassination produced by UVU's "stunning failures," centering Chief Long's "I got you covered" reply after Turning Point USA flagged student rooftop access and arguing that only the university had authority to lock down rooftops, create a perimeter, or move the event indoors. They highlighted six officers for thousands of attendees despite denied requests for more help, the absence of real-time CCTV monitoring even though later footage showed a person running to what an officer called a "sniper's pad," no on-site ambulance, and no written security plan. They situated the event in what they described as a climate of left-wing political violence, noted Kirk's publicly discussed death threats and proximity to Donald Trump, and reported that UVU's promised independent review remained unreleased a year later after at least $240,000 in spending. The Federalist described the accused as a leftist who, prosecutors say, shot Kirk because he hated his views.
Our Take (balanced)
The right's strongest argument is foreseeability backed by a specific warning: Turning Point USA flagged nearby rooftop access, Long answered "I got you covered," the 2024 Trump rooftop shooting was recent, and unmonitored footage later showed movement across a roof to a firing position — evidence that standard precautions for a controversial outdoor speaker were not taken. Left-leaning coverage's strongest point is that the notice is an unproven claim, not a finding of liability; UVU says it will follow established legal processes, an independent review was commissioned, and the person who fired the shot is being prosecuted for aggravated murder. The central unresolved tension is whether UVU's planning and staffing choices constitute legal negligence that made the killing preventable, or whether residual risk at an open campus event is a matter for the criminal case and the pending review rather than civil fault.

11 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.