OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

California Couple Pleads Not Guilty to Child Abuse

5 sources · updated 2026-10-09
Left 33% Center 67% Right 0%
1 left · 2 center · 0 right

What happened

Guojun Xuan, 66, and Silvia Zhang, 39, were arrested at their Arcadia, California mansion and charged with multiple counts of abusing at least 14 children born via surrogacy—some as young as two months—and with dissuading a witness. They pleaded not guilty in a Pasadena courthouse and are each held on $20 million bond. Prosecutors say 21 children were removed after a July 2025 raid on the home; the investigation began in May 2025 after Zhang took a two-month-old boy with a head injury to a hospital. The couple ran a surrogacy company and are accused of conspiring with nannies, monitored by 32 cameras, to subject 15 of 16 children in the house to repeated physical abuse. Nanny Chunmei Li, 58, was previously charged in the infant’s injury and is at large on a $105,000 warrant.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 3 articles

3 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report. Mitchell Krems denied part of it on the record.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 3 of 3
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Los Angeles DA, Los Angeles District Attorney and Vanity McGoveran
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 3
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: charges, court complaint, district attorney statement
Credits another outlet 0 of 3
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 3
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
On-record denial 1
A named person or institution says the claim, or part of it, is not true. It is on the record — someone signed their name to it — but it is not confirmation, so it never counts toward On the record. Criticizing or dissenting from a decision is not a denial. The count is how many people or institutions deny it; each is listed with the first article that carried the denial. Here: Mitchell Krems (CBS News, Oct 8, 22:13 UTC)
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 7, 20:56 UTC by NewsNation, naming its source. First document 1 hour later, from BBC (charges).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
ONE-SIDED THIS WEEK. Only left-leaning outlets have covered this story in the last two days; OAN reported it on 2026-10-07.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage reports that a California couple has been charged with abusing children born through surrogacy and has pleaded not guilty. The BBC reports at least 14 alleged victims. Left-leaning coverage also carries the Los Angeles district attorney's description of their Arcadia mansion as a "house of horrors." The same coverage says the pair ran a surrogacy company. They are accused of making false statements to women who became surrogates. It traces the investigation to Zhang bringing an injured infant to a hospital. Footage from cameras in the home allegedly shows nannies hitting the children. One nanny is described as still on the run. Authorities had already taken 21 children into state custody before these charges. The BBC accounts do not disagree on those core allegations. The shorter piece omits the defense claim that Xuan is being targeted for exercising a right to a large family. It also omits the possible prison terms if they are convicted. Right-leaning outlets had not covered this as of publication. A reader on that silent side would not know the couple had been arrested. How were overlapping surrogate pregnancies commissioned without the mothers knowing they were carrying for the same couple?
Bottom line

Right-leaning news has not reported that a California couple now faces child-abuse charges the BBC says involve at least 14 surrogate-born children.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Xuan and Zhang were charged with abusing at least 14 surrogate-born children and pleaded not guilty numberin BBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The Arcadia mansion allegedly had 32 motion-activated cameras used to monitor discipline by nannies numberin BBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Xuan and Zhang are each being held on a $20 million bond numberin CBS News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Zhang and Xuan's parental rights have not been terminated as the investigation plays out legal rulingin CBS News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Xuan allegedly asked a nanny who was striking a child to hit the child harder individual casein CBS News · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
BBC and CBS report Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman calling the mansion a “house of horrors” and the scale of alleged abuse “unprecedented,” citing a criminal complaint that describes nannies spanking, slapping, and hitting young children while the couple watched via cameras—and in one alleged instance Xuan telling a nanny to hit harder. Outlets note accusations that the pair misled at least two surrogates about Zhang’s fertility and kept a spreadsheet of 21 children. Coverage includes the not-guilty pleas, defense claims that Xuan is being targeted for having a large family, Li’s outstanding warrant, possible prison terms if convicted, and CBS reporting on the children’s placement, un-terminated parental rights, and surrogates seeking to foster or adopt. NewsNation similarly attributes the abuse allegations to the DA.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: named defendants and a named nanny, specific felony charges, a court appearance and not-guilty pleas, a DA statement, bond amounts, a prior raid that removed 21 children, and complaint details (hospital visit, cameras, “learning centres”) that can be checked against filings. Abuse, conspiracy, false statements to surrogates, and camera-directed discipline remain allegations until proven in court; the couple denies the charges. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch next for the unsealed or fuller complaint, Li’s arrest or further charging, whether parental rights are terminated, custody and foster/adoption proceedings for the children (including babies born after the raid in other states), and upcoming court dates.

5 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.