Andrew Tate Accused of Possessing Bestiality Porn and Sex With Minors
Left 0%
Center 0%
Right 100%
0 left · 0 center · 3 right
What happened
British prosecutors filed papers in Florida federal court as part of a bid to extradite Andrew Tate from the United States to the United Kingdom. The filing alleges that after Tate’s July 2015 arrest in Hitchin, Hertfordshire, on suspicion of rape and sexual assault, police seized devices containing 168 indecent images and videos of a 17-year-old girl who had worked in his webcam business, plus extreme pornography. Tate, 39, and his brother Tristan, 38, dual U.S./U.K. citizens, are in federal detention in Miami fighting extradition; they face 59 U.K. charges including rape and sex trafficking. U.K. prosecutors declined to charge Tate in the 2015 matter in 2019. Both brothers deny all wrongdoing and say encounters with women were consensual.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 3 articles
2 of 3 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report, credited to The Telegraph. Joseph McBride denied part of it on the record.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 3
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: British prosecutors and British authorities
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 3
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: court filing
- Credits another outlet 2 of 3
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: The Telegraph, TMZ
- Unnamed sources 0 of 3
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- On-record denial 1
- A named person or institution says the claim, or part of it, is not true. It is on the record — someone signed their name to it — but it is not confirmation, so it never counts toward On the record. Criticizing or dissenting from a decision is not a denial. The count is how many people or institutions deny it; each is listed with the first article that carried the denial. Here: Joseph McBride (Daily Caller, Oct 7, 00:32 UTC)
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 6, 11:46 UTC by Daily Wire, crediting The Telegraph, naming its source. First document 4 hours later, from New York Post (court filing).
- Not counted 0
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
BLINDSPOT.
Only right-leaning outlets are covering this story
— the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Left-leaning coverage has not reported a British extradition filing that right-leaning coverage says accuses Andrew Tate of keeping indecent images of a 17-year-old webcam worker and extreme animal pornography. Readers of that side therefore miss the claim that 66 of the teen's files fell in Britain's most serious class. Right-leaning coverage also reports a seized text from 2015 said to show he knew her age. Among the outlets that did cover it, only the Daily Wire records that U.K. prosecutors declined to charge him in 2019.
Right-leaning coverage does not agree on the lead. An account in the Daily Wire opens on a minor inside Tate's webcam business, while the New York Post opens on bestiality images of a horse and an eel.
Why did prosecutors who once declined the 2015 file revive it now as grounds for extradition?
Bottom line
Even the Daily Wire notes U.K. prosecutors declined to charge Tate over these files in 2019, a wrinkle no left-leaning reader is seeing because that side has not carried the filing.
The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
- Prosecutors say 66 of the files of the teen fell into Category A, Britain's most serious classification
- Police found 168 indecent images and videos of the teen on Tate's phone and laptop after the July 2015 arrest
- The girl's passport, found inside Tate's home, showed she was still a minor when he was arrested
- Tate attorney Joseph McBride said authorities are no longer in possession of the actual device
- U.S. Magistrate Lauren Louis ruled the brothers should remain behind bars during the extradition fight
The Right View
Daily Wire, New York Post, and Daily Caller, citing the U.K. extradition filing and Telegraph/TMZ, report prosecutors claim 66 of the files were Category A indecent images and 26 Category B; that Tate knew the girl was 17, based on her passport and January 2015 texts; and that he later shared videos of her in a WhatsApp group. They also report alleged extreme pornography on his devices, including images of intercourse with a live eel and a horse, plus accusations from women of non-consensual choking. Coverage notes related Romanian human-trafficking and underage-grooming indictments, flight-risk claims including fake passports, and Tate’s lawyer Joseph McBride calling the material “prosecution slop,” disputing that Tate viewed it, and saying the case is weak. Outlets stress the brothers remain jailed and deny the allegations.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive as news of a court filing: it rests on named prosecutors, a Florida federal extradition docket, specific counts, dates, and a named defense attorney—not a single anonymous source. What is established is that the U.K. has asked the U.S. to extradite the Tates, that they are detained in Miami, and that the filing makes these claims; what remains alleged, and unproven in court, is possession, knowledge of age, sexual offenses, trafficking, and the content itself. No left-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch the extradition docket, whether the government produces the seized devices and the 2015 texts, any U.K. or defense filings that confirm or contest the inventory, and official responses from prosecutors and counsel.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.