OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Americans Debt Problems Near Great Recession Levels

2 sources · updated 2026-10-10
Left 50% Center 0% Right 50%
1 left · 0 center · 1 right

What happened

The Federal Reserve on Friday released its triennial Survey of Consumer Finances, covering U.S. household finances through the end of 2025. The share of families behind on loan payments rose from about 12 percent in the 2022 survey to nearly 20 percent, and those at least two months behind rose from 5 percent to more than 8 percent, the highest rates since the 2010 survey that followed the Great Recession of December 2007 to June 2009. Families with debt payments exceeding 40 percent of income rose to 8.6 percent from 6.5 percent, the highest since 2013; the median debt-payment-to-income ratio rose two percentage points to 15.4 percent, and the total debt-to-income ratio rose to 94.9 percent from 89.4 percent. Inflation-adjusted average net worth increased 7 percent to $1.24 million and median net worth rose 2 percent to $215,900, slower than in 2019–2022, with median net worth up 31 percent for the top income group and down 6 percent for the bottom income quartile. Real median family income rose 7 percent while average income fell 6 percent; the Fed said income inequality decreased slightly, as families 75 and older saw wealth rise 37 percent and strong income gains while income for ages 35–44 fell 25 percent and wealth for those under 35 fell 23 percent.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 2 articles

2 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 2 of 2
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Federal Reserve
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 2
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: Survey of Consumer Finances
Credits another outlet 0 of 2
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 0 of 2
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Oct 9, 14:30 UTC by CNBC, naming its source. First document in the first report, from CNBC (Survey of Consumer Finances).
Not counted 0
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Right-leaning coverage never reports that average family income fell during the same stretch when missed payments jumped, so the debt spike arrives beside a story of pay and wealth still climbing. Left-leaning coverage states that average income dropped 6 percent even as the median rose. That mixed result is absent from the right-leaning account, which instead says that "incomes rose for most Americans." Left-leaning coverage opens on the missed-payment spike as a warning and holds net-worth gains for later in the piece. Right-leaning coverage puts rising wealth in the lede with the delinquency jump, then notes later that wealth still fell for lower earners. Neither side says which debts those households missed, or whether the jump in late payments is concentrated among the families whose wealth declined.
Bottom line

NY Post readers never see the Fed's 6 percent drop in average income. That is the number that sits least easily next to a story of debt soaring while wealth and pay rise for most families.

The receipts — 4 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Average family income dropped 6% numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Median debt payment as a share of income rose to 15.4% numberin New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Total debt-to-income ratio hit 94.9%, up from 89.4% in 2022 numberin New York Post · absent from left-leaning coverage
  • Income fell 25% for families aged 35 to 44 numberin CNBC · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
CNBC frames the findings as a “warning not seen since the Great Recession,” stressing that families’ ability to meet debt payments “deteriorated significantly” even as wealth disparities narrowed somewhat. It cites a New York Fed survey in which households said their finances had worsened from a year earlier and were likely to be weaker ahead, and situates the period as one of continued growth with inflation not seen since the early 1980s. The coverage highlights that lower-income families “saw some declines” in wealth while higher earners’ net worth soared, that Black non-Hispanic and Asian families were exceptions whose median and mean income fell, and that college-educated households had nearly three times the median net worth of those with only some college.
The Right View
The New York Post frames the same report as debt soaring near Great Recession levels “even as wealth levels rise” and consumer spending remaining strong, treating the delinquency jump as a cause for concern alongside a slight decrease in wealth disparity and income gains for most Americans emerging from the Covid pandemic. It notes that net-worth gains were “much slower” than the 37 percent surge in 2019–2022, continued to favor the affluent (median wealth down for the bottom 40 percent of earners), and were driven especially by stock-market gains for those 75 and older—helping explain why younger Americans have taken longer to buy a first home. The paper contrasts consumer sentiment at its second-lowest level on record amid stubborn inflation with resilient household spending, up 6.1 percent through August in both prices and purchase volume, and flags Gen Z credit-card interest as a worrying trend.
Our Take (balanced)
The left’s strongest argument is that post-2010-high delinquencies and the highest share of families with payment-to-income ratios above 40 percent since 2013 show genuine financial strain, reinforced by wealth declines at the bottom and by the age, race, and education gaps the same survey records. The right’s strongest argument is that average and median net worth still rose, the Fed itself reported a slight narrowing of income inequality, and spending remained strong in volume, so the data describe uneven post-pandemic adjustment rather than a 2008-style collapse. The central unresolved tension is whether those delinquency and payment-burden spikes, set against still-positive but slower and highly uneven wealth, signal a broad household-finance warning comparable to the Great Recession’s aftermath or a concentrated squeeze on younger and lower-income families while aggregate balance sheets and consumption hold up.

2 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.