US Data Centers Face Backlash Over Pollution and Power Use
Left 100%
Center 0%
Right 0%
2 left · 0 center · 0 right
What happened
Companies have been buying rural U.S. land at elevated prices to build AI data centers, which need large sites plus substantial electricity and water. Commercial real estate firm Avison Young reported about $6 billion in U.S. land purchases for future data centers in the first half of 2026, a 79% increase from the prior year. Residents and officials in places including Lubbock, Texas; Buchanan County, Iowa; Lancaster, Pennsylvania; Loudoun County, Virginia; Boise-area Idaho; and Saline Township, Michigan, have objected to farmland conversion, water use, and power costs; some local boards and states have paused or restricted new projects. An NBC News Decision Desk poll conducted Aug. 20–Sept. 1 found 69% of respondents opposed AI data centers in their local area. President Donald Trump has urged communities to accept them, while several Republican and Democratic officials who previously promoted the facilities have shifted toward moratoriums, audits, or rules requiring operators to cover infrastructure costs ahead of November midterm elections.
Sourcing check · Fully on the record · 3 articles
2 of 2 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.
What these terms mean and how they're counted
- On the record · names a source 2 of 2
- On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: Sid Miller, Avison Young, Dawn Vogel, NBC News Decision Desk Poll and Donald Trump
- Primary evidence · cites a document or data 2 of 2
- Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: market data, protest event, poll
- Credits another outlet 0 of 2
- The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
- Unnamed sources 0 of 2
- The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
- How it developed
- When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Sep 6, 12:00 UTC by CNBC, naming its source. First document in the first report, from CNBC (market data).
- Not counted 1
- Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
BLINDSPOT.
Only left-leaning outlets are covering this story
— the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out
Unpacked
Right-leaning outlets have not covered the rural fight over AI data centers at all, so their readers miss a backlash left-leaning coverage treats as both a land-market story and a midterm issue that cuts across party lines. Left-leaning coverage reports developers offering multiples of farmland value, communities worrying about water and electricity, and politicians from Abbott to Shapiro slowing projects after having promoted them. CNBC and NBC News do not contradict each other on the facts, but they split on emphasis. One dwells on acre prices and investment-bank warnings about political risk. The other leads with a finding that most people oppose local construction and with Trump's line that holdout communities will be "backwards and poor." A reader of the silent side therefore never sees that Republican county officials have passed moratoriums or that GOP-leaning respondents mostly oppose the projects.
Have any of the counties now fighting data centers published a measured rise in household power or water bills after a facility opened?
Bottom line
NBC News found 69 percent opposition to putting an AI data center nearby, a rural fight that already includes Republican-county bans and that right-leaning outlets have not reported.
The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
- 69% of respondents oppose construction of AI data centers in their local area
- U.S. land purchases for future data centers reached about $6 billion in the first half of 2026
- Data center load growth produced a $23.1 billion increase in PJM capacity-market revenues through 2028
- The National Republican Senatorial Committee warned that data centers are the anchor hanging around Sen. Jon Husted's neck
- As many as nine states have pending moratoriums on new data center development
The Left View
CNBC, NBC News, and Vox describe a national land rush in which tech firms and investors outbid farmers and home builders, with site prices in some power-rich areas (e.g., Northern Virginia) reported far above local medians. They highlight community worries about water and electricity, citing a May Monitoring Analytics report that data-center load growth was “the primary reason” for high prices in PJM capacity markets and a combined $23.1 billion increase in capacity-market revenues through 2028. Coverage documents specific fights: a July Lubbock protest featuring Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller; Pennsylvania farmers placing conservation easements; death threats reported by Saline Township, Michigan, clerk Kelly Marion over a Related Digital project for Oracle and OpenAI; and Iowa Republican supervisor Dawn Vogel backing a county moratorium. NBC reports 57% of Republicans, 81% of Democrats, and 71% of independents opposed local data centers, and notes unions and some workers citing high-paying construction jobs. Vox and NBC frame a cross-party political reversal—Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s grid-connection pause, Ohio Sen. Jon Husted’s cost-recovery bill, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s new regulations, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul’s hyperscale moratorium, and similar shifts by figures such as Rep. Ro Khanna—against Trump’s continued “let Data Reign” stance, with bank notes (Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, Mizuho) treating state and local backlash as a midterm and investment risk.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it rests on named officials, dated poll fieldwork, cited real-estate and market-monitor figures, identifiable local actions, and published bank notes—not a single anonymous leak. Established in the reporting as presented are the Avison Young and CBRE land-price figures, the NBC poll totals, Buchanan County’s moratorium vote, Hochul’s July pause, Abbott’s construction/grid pause pending audit, Husted’s Senate bill, Shapiro’s August regulations, and public statements by Trump, Miller, Vogel, Marion, and others. Still alleged or only locally attested here are the Michigan death threats, the precise water impact on named farms, and claims that data-center politics will decide specific midterm races. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch next for the texts of state moratoriums and Texas’s grid audit, utility dockets on cost allocation, official responses to the Saline Township threats, and results in named contests such as Ohio’s Senate race and Iowa’s 3rd District.
3 sources
More stories
The week's bottom lines, in your inbox
One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.