OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Debate Over 9/11 Legacy and Muslim Americans 25 Years Later

3 sources · updated 2026-09-13
Left 50% Center 0% Right 50%
1 left · 0 center · 1 right

What happened

In September 2026, around the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks, multiple Republican officials and activists made public statements about Islam, Muslim immigration, and Muslim Americans in elected office. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) wrote that every Muslim holding public office is a trojan horse and a threat to national security. Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) called Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed a radical Islamist; similar remarks came from Reps. Randy Fine (R-FL), Andy Ogles (R-TN), and others, as well as activist Laura Loomer. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott designated the Council on American-Islamic Relations a foreign terrorist organization. At a GOP midterm convention in Dallas, Sen. Ted Cruz linked Islamism with threats to America amid campaigns involving Muslim Democrats including New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani.
BLINDSPOT. Only left-leaning outlets are covering this story — the other side's media is silent.
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage reports that Republican officials have ramped up anti-Muslim rhetoric around the 25th anniversary of 9/11, and that this hostility clusters around elections rather than terror attacks. Right-leaning outlets had not covered the story as of publication. A reader of that silent side would miss the quoted remarks from members of Congress and a senator, and the claim that Texas has labeled the largest Muslim civil-rights group a terrorist organization. The same quotations get different frames. Left-leaning coverage splits that frame after repeating many of the same lines: Mother Jones treats the targeting of Muslims as now "the purpose" of the party, while the Guardian stresses election-calendar timing and closes on Muslim electoral gains. Do the governors' terrorist designations of CAIR carry any legal force?
Bottom line

Mother Jones quotes Republican officials who say the country needs "more Islamophobia." Right-leaning outlets have not reported those remarks or Texas branding CAIR a terrorist organization.

The receipts — 5 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • Texas Gov. Greg Abbott designated CAIR a foreign terrorist organization official statementin Guardian, Mother Jones · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Nearly a third of the House Republican conference belongs to the Sharia-Free America Caucus numberin Mother Jones · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • A record 255 Muslims serve in elected office in the United States numberin Guardian · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • Florida has designated CAIR a terrorist organization official statementin Mother Jones · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • GOP midterm convention attendees in Dallas screamed that named Democrats should be shot as Sen. Ted Cruz name-checked Zohran Mamdani contextin Vox · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
The Guardian, Mother Jones, and Vox reported that Republican anti-Muslim rhetoric has intensified 25 years after 9/11 and is now more open and institutionalized than in the immediate post-attack period. They compiled named quotes from GOP figures including Loomer, Mace, Fine, Tuberville, JD Vance, Abbott, and Cruz, plus a House Sharia-Free America Caucus and state actions against CAIR, framing the comments as election-cycle Islamophobia used against Muslim candidates such as Mamdani and El-Sayed rather than a reaction to new terrorist attacks. The outlets contrasted this with earlier Republican efforts to limit backlash, argued it has moved from fringe to party mainstream, and noted rising Muslim representation in office as a counter-development.
Our Take (balanced)
The story is substantive: it rests on specific, named public statements by identifiable officials and a documented gubernatorial designation, all of which are checkable against original posts, speeches, and records rather than anonymous or uncorroborated claims. Established are the attributed remarks and Abbott’s CAIR action as reported; claims that this constitutes a coordinated party-wide campaign, a new level of animus, or the core purpose of the GOP remain the covering outlets’ interpretive framing. No right-leaning outlet has reported this. Watch for primary-source verification of the quotes and designation order, any official responses or retractions from the named Republicans, and related bills or campaign materials in the 2026 midterms.

3 sources

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.