OMITTED

What the news leaves out.

← Omitted front page

Voting Machine Failures Hit Key New York House Race

7 sources · updated 2026-11-04
Left 71% Center 14% Right 14%
5 left · 1 center · 1 right

What happened

On Tuesday, ballot scanners in Westchester County, New York, failed to accept voters' hand-marked paper ballots at polling locations in 44 of the county's 45 municipalities. New York State election officials said the problem was a programming error; the Westchester County Board of Elections initially blamed the thickness of the paper ballots but later removed that explanation from its public statement. Officials directed voters to place completed ballots in secure orange bags under bipartisan control to be counted after polls closed at 9 p.m., and began rolling out alternate tabulators. The disruption affected a county that covers roughly 30 percent of New York's 17th Congressional District, where Republican Rep. Mike Lawler faces Democrat Cait Conley in a closely contested U.S. House race. Attorney General Letitia James said her office was monitoring the scanners, Gov. Kathy Hochul said every vote would be counted, both candidates urged voters not to leave, and Lawler said his campaign was already in court seeking to have the ballots counted in one central location observed by campaign staff, election monitors, and attorneys.
Sourcing check · Mostly on the record · 7 articles

4 of 6 articles cite a named source for the story. It was on the record from the first report.

What these terms mean and how they're counted
On the record · names a source 4 of 6
On the record means the article cites a source by name for the story's main claim: a person, or an institution speaking officially, such as a company statement or a named agency's spokesperson. The opposite is an unnamed source. The count is how many of the counted articles cite at least one such source; the names are everyone named across them, each once however the articles spell it. Here: New York Attorney General Letitia James, New York State Board of Elections, Ken Jenkins, Kathy Hochul, Westchester County Board of Elections and Mike Lawler
Primary evidence · cites a document or data 0 of 6
Primary evidence means the article cites a record you could check yourself: a court filing or ruling, a dataset or report, a recording or transcript, an official statement or press release, market data. A quote is not a document. The count is how many articles cite one. Here: None cited.
Credits another outlet 0 of 6
The article says the story comes from another outlet's reporting (“first reported by Reuters”). Those articles relay the story; they are not independent confirmation. Here: Each article presents its own reporting.
Unnamed sources 1 of 6
The main claim is attributed to people who are not identified: “people familiar with the matter”, “officials said”. The count is how many articles do this.
How it developed
When the first report landed and whether it named anyone; when the first named source and the first document appeared. Here: First report Nov 3, 11:07 UTC by Daily Wire, naming its source.
Not counted 1
Opinion, analysis and video pieces, and articles too short to assess. Every count above is out of the counted articles. An article republished under a new headline is one article.
This is about who is cited, not whether the story is true. Each source below says what it names. How we count
Omitted — what each side leaves out

Unpacked

Left-leaning coverage treated Republican alarm as online conspiracy talk and omitted that the incumbent said he had already gone to court over how the bagged ballots would be counted. Accusations of a steal filled the NBC News account, from influencers to an elected official. Right-leaning coverage carried his demand that the votes be counted in "one central location" with campaign monitors present. Without that demand, readers get theories versus a routine glitch, not a live fight over where and how emergency ballots get counted. The same bags drew opposite language. Left-leaning coverage called them "secure orange ballot bags" under a standard plan. Right-leaning coverage described votes as "Forced Into Orange Bags." Where has the county said the orange-bag ballots will actually be counted, and who will be allowed in the room?
Bottom line

You could read NBC News on the Westchester scanner outage and never learn Lawler said he was already in court to watch those bagged ballots counted in one room.

The receipts — 2 facts one side's coverage lacks
  • State election officials said the scanner failures were due to a programming error official statementin NBC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
  • The New York State Board of Elections said completed ballots are secured under bipartisan control and will be counted official statementin NBC News · absent from right-leaning coverage
The Left View
Left-leaning outlets treated the scanner failures as a routine technical glitch that Republican influencers and officials recast as Democratic cheating. NBC News reported that isolated ballot-scanner problems are common—especially in New York, where scanners jammed across New York City in 2018 and Queens reported tabulator issues in 2024—and that similar machine problems occurred this year in Florida and Oklahoma, while heavy rain and flooding, not fraud, caused polling-site disruptions in Arizona's Maricopa County. NBC quoted GOP-aligned voices including the Loomer Unleashed podcast ('The Democrats are already cheating'), Rep. Claudia Tenner ('The Democrats in NY will do anything and everything to cheat'), and Katie Miller ('This is how the Left steals elections'), and said the accusations echo false 2020 claims that machines stole the presidential election from Republicans. Researchers who study false online information told NBC such narratives around ordinary glitches could 'pave the way toward challenging the results.' On the ground in Sleepy Hollow, NBC found voting proceeding smoothly, with only two of 225 voters walking away because scanners were down; Bloomberg noted the possibility of delayed results in the House race.
The Right View
Right-leaning coverage emphasized chain-of-custody doubts and unanswered questions about how a countywide failure reached Election Day. The Daily Wire highlighted Lawler's court effort to have the bagged ballots counted in one central location so his campaign, monitors, and attorneys could oversee the process, and quoted a voter who called placing completed ballots in orange bags 'extraordinarily troubling' and asked what safeguards existed, who handled the ballots, who accounted for every one, and who independently verified the count. The outlet said no reporting or official statements had explained how the county was unaware of the issue before polls opened or how its vendor 'passed off ballots that could not be properly scanned.' While noting online speculation of a Democratic attempt to 'steal' the election, the Daily Wire observed that Westchester is likely to break for Conley—Kamala Harris beat Donald Trump there by about 25 points in 2024—treating the integrity concern as a process and transparency problem rather than proven partisan theft.
Our Take (balanced)
The left's strongest argument is that countywide scanner failures of this type are historically ordinary in New York and other states, that bipartisan contingency procedures were in place, and that high-profile cheating claims recycle 2020 machine-fraud narratives without evidence tied to this incident—supported by NBC's citations of prior New York malfunctions, weather-driven Maricopa closures mischaracterized as cheating, and a Sleepy Hollow precinct where almost no voters left. The right's strongest argument is that, even setting aside a 'steal' narrative the Daily Wire itself undercuts by noting Westchester's Democratic lean, a countywide failure whose public explanation was revised and whose origin (pre-election testing, vendor ballots) remains unexplained, plus Lawler's bid for a single observed count and voters' questions about bagged-ballot custody, constitutes a real transparency gap. The central unresolved tension is whether this episode is mainly a contained, routine glitch whose political meaning comes from recycled conspiracy claims, or an unexplained quality-control breakdown whose bag-and-count-later remedy has not yet been shown to be fully observable.

7 sources

More stories

The week's bottom lines, in your inbox

One email a week: the five stories that mattered and what they actually mean. Free.